Literature DB >> 27475796

Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use.

Sébastien Schmerber1, O Deguine2, M Marx2, P Van de Heyning3, O Sterkers4, I Mosnier4, P Garin5, B Godey6, C Vincent7, F Venail8, M Mondain8, A Deveze9, J P Lavieille9, A Karkas10.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new transcutaneous bone-conduction implant (BCI BB) in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss or with single-sided deafness (SSD), 1 year after surgical implantation. The study design is multicentric prospective, intra-subject measurements. Each subject is his/her own control. The setting is nine university hospitals: 7 French and 2 Belgian. Sixteen subjects with conductive or mixed hearing loss with bone-conduction hearing thresholds under the upper limit of 45 dB HL for each frequency from 500 to 4000 Hz, and 12 subjects with SSD (contralateral hearing within normal range) were enrolled in the study. All subjects were older than 18 years. The intervention is rehabilitative. The main outcome measure is the evaluation of skin safety, audiological measurements, benefit, and satisfaction questionnaires with a 1-year follow up. Skin safety was rated as good or very good. For the mixed or conductive hearing loss groups, the average functional gain (at 500 Hz, 1, 2, 4 kHz) was 26.1 dB HL (SD 13.7), and mean percentage of speech recognition in quiet at 65 dB was 95 % (vs 74 % unaided). In 5/6 SSD subjects, values of SRT in noise were lower with BB. Questionnaires revealed patient benefit and satisfaction. The transcutaneous BCI is very well tolerated at 1-year follow up, improves audiometric thresholds and intelligibility for speech in quiet and noise, and gives satisfaction to both patients with mixed and conductive hearing loss and patients with SSD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bonebridge; Conductive and mixed hearing loss; Direct-drive; Percutaneous; Questionnaires; Single-sided deafness; Transcutaneous bone-conduction implant

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27475796     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4228-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  52 in total

1.  Transcranial attenuation of bone-conducted sound when stimulation is at the mastoid and at the bone conduction hearing aid position.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Re: Noise levels generated within the external auditory canal during microsuction aural toilet and the effect on hearing: a prospective controlled series.

Authors:  D M Baguley; R D Knight
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.597

3.  A computed tomographic data-based vibrant bonebridge visualization tool.

Authors:  I Todt; H Lamecker; H Ramm; A Ernst
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2014-05

4.  Long-term subjective benefit with a bone conduction implant sound processor in 44 patients with single-sided deafness.

Authors:  Jolien Desmet; Kristien Wouters; Marc De Bodt; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant.

Authors:  Dominik Riss; Christoph Arnoldner; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Michaela Blineder; Stefan Flak; Anna Bachner; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Jafar-Sasan Hamzavi
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Image-guided placement of the Bonebridge™ without surgical navigation equipment.

Authors:  Byunghyun Cho; Nozomu Matsumoto; Megumu Mori; Shizuo Komune; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a 14-year experience.

Authors:  Khaled Badran; Dan Bunstone; Arvind K Arya; Ranganathan Suryanarayanan; Neil Mackinnon
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Retrosigmoid implantation of an active bone conduction stimulator in a patient with chronic otitis media.

Authors:  Luis Lassaletta; Isabel Sanchez-Cuadrado; Elena Muñoz; Javier Gavilan
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.863

9.  The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device.

Authors:  A M Huber; J H Sim; Y Z Xie; M Chatzimichalis; O Ullrich; C Röösli
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The Bonebridge semi-implantable bone conduction hearing device: experience in an Asian patient.

Authors:  W S S Tsang; J K Y Yu; K S S Bhatia; T K C Wong; M C F Tong
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 1.469

View more
  25 in total

1.  Bone Conduction Implants for Hearing Rehabilitation in Skull Base Tumor Patients.

Authors:  Lauren Placke; Eric N Appelbaum; Akash J Patel; Alex D Sweeney
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-02-06

2.  Audiological effectiveness of Bonebridge implantation for bilateral congenital malformation of the external and middle ear.

Authors:  Ran Ren; Shouqin Zhao; Danni Wang; Yi Li; Xiaobo Ma; Yuling Li; Xinxing Fu; Peiwei Chen; Jingmin Dou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  [Active hearing implants in chronic otitis media].

Authors:  S Lailach; C Müller; N Lasurashvili; H Seidler; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Long-term audiological benefit with an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Julia Hundertpfund; Jens Eduard Meyer; Attila Ovari
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Three-Year Follow-Up with the Bone Conduction Implant.

Authors:  Ann-Charlotte Persson; Sabine Reinfeldt; Bo Håkansson; Cristina Rigato; Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson; Måns Eeg-Olofsson
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 6.  Efficacy of Auditory Implants for Patients With Conductive and Mixed Hearing Loss Depends on Implant Center.

Authors:  Ad Snik; Hannes Maier; Bill Hodgetts; Martin Kompis; Griet Mertens; Paul van de Heyning; Thomas Lenarz; Arjan Bosman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 7.  Implantable hearing devices.

Authors:  Matthias Tisch
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

8.  A Bone Conduction Implantable Device as a Functional Treatment Option in Unilateral Microtia with Bilateral Stapes Ankylosis: A Report of Two Cases.

Authors:  Diego Zanetti; Federica Di Berardino
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2018-01-23

9.  Long-term Outcomes of Bone Conduction Hearing Implants in Patients With Bilateral Microtia-atresia.

Authors:  Xinmiao Fan; Tengyu Yang; Xiaomin Niu; Yibei Wang; Yue Fan; Xiaowei Chen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implants: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Astrid Magele; Philipp Schoerg; Barbara Stanek; Bernhard Gradl; Georg Mathias Sprinzl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.