Literature DB >> 23358416

The piggyBac transposon displays local and distant reintegration preferences and can cause mutations at noncanonical integration sites.

Meng Amy Li1, Stephen J Pettitt, Sabine Eckert, Zemin Ning, Stephen Rice, Juan Cadiñanos, Kosuke Yusa, Nathalie Conte, Allan Bradley.   

Abstract

The DNA transposon piggyBac is widely used as a tool in mammalian experimental systems for transgenesis, mutagenesis, and genome engineering. We have characterized genome-wide insertion site preferences of piggyBac by sequencing a large set of integration sites arising from transposition from two separate genomic loci and a plasmid donor in mouse embryonic stem cells. We found that piggyBac preferentially integrates locally to the excision site when mobilized from a chromosomal location and identified other nonlocal regions of the genome with elevated insertion frequencies. piggyBac insertions were associated with expressed genes and markers of open chromatin structure and were excluded from heterochromatin. At the nucleotide level, piggyBac prefers to insert into TA-rich regions within a broader GC-rich context. We also found that piggyBac can insert into sites other than its known TTAA insertion site at a low frequency (2%). Such insertions introduce mismatches that are repaired with signatures of host cell repair pathways. Transposons could be mobilized from plasmids with the observed noncanonical flanking regions, indicating that piggyBac could generate point mutations in the genome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23358416      PMCID: PMC3624274          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00670-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  46 in total

1.  Chromosomal mobilization and reintegration of Sleeping Beauty and PiggyBac transposons.

Authors:  Qi Liang; Jun Kong; James Stalker; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.487

2.  Mismatch and base excision repair proficiency in murine embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Elisia D Tichy; Li Liang; Li Deng; Jay Tischfield; Sandy Schwemberger; George Babcock; Peter J Stambrook
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-02-18

3.  A hyperactive piggyBac transposase for mammalian applications.

Authors:  Kosuke Yusa; Liqin Zhou; Meng Amy Li; Allan Bradley; Nancy L Craig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation.

Authors:  Daan Peric-Hupkes; Wouter Meuleman; Ludo Pagie; Sophia W M Bruggeman; Irina Solovei; Wim Brugman; Stefan Gräf; Paul Flicek; Ron M Kerkhoven; Maarten van Lohuizen; Marcel Reinders; Lodewyk Wessels; Bas van Steensel
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Genome-wide forward genetic screens in mouse ES cells.

Authors:  Meng Amy Li; Stephen J Pettitt; Kosuke Yusa; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  PiggyBac transposon mutagenesis: a tool for cancer gene discovery in mice.

Authors:  Roland Rad; Lena Rad; Wei Wang; Juan Cadinanos; George Vassiliou; Stephen Rice; Lia S Campos; Kosuke Yusa; Ruby Banerjee; Meng Amy Li; Jorge de la Rosa; Alexander Strong; Dong Lu; Peter Ellis; Nathalie Conte; Fang Tang Yang; Pentao Liu; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Tracing the derivation of embryonic stem cells from the inner cell mass by single-cell RNA-Seq analysis.

Authors:  Fuchou Tang; Catalin Barbacioru; Siqin Bao; Caroline Lee; Ellen Nordman; Xiaohui Wang; Kaiqin Lao; M Azim Surani
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 24.633

8.  53BP1 loss rescues BRCA1 deficiency and is associated with triple-negative and BRCA-mutated breast cancers.

Authors:  Peter Bouwman; Amal Aly; Jose M Escandell; Mark Pieterse; Jirina Bartkova; Hanneke van der Gulden; Sanne Hiddingh; Maria Thanasoula; Atul Kulkarni; Qifeng Yang; Bruce G Haffty; Johanna Tommiska; Carl Blomqvist; Ronny Drapkin; David J Adams; Heli Nevanlinna; Jiri Bartek; Madalena Tarsounas; Shridar Ganesan; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 15.369

9.  Slingshot: a PiggyBac based transposon system for tamoxifen-inducible 'self-inactivating' insertional mutagenesis.

Authors:  Jun Kong; Feng Wang; James D Brenton; David J Adams
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Generation of transgene-free induced pluripotent mouse stem cells by the piggyBac transposon.

Authors:  Kosuke Yusa; Roland Rad; Junji Takeda; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  37 in total

1.  Excision efficiency is not strongly coupled to transgenic rate: cell type-dependent transposition efficiency of sleeping beauty and piggyBac DNA transposons.

Authors:  Orsolya Kolacsek; Zsuzsa Erdei; Agota Apáti; Sára Sándor; Zsuzsanna Izsvák; Zoltán Ivics; Balázs Sarkadi; Tamás I Orbán
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther Methods       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.396

2.  Seamless genome editing in human pluripotent stem cells using custom endonuclease-based gene targeting and the piggyBac transposon.

Authors:  Kosuke Yusa
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 3.  LITTLE FISH, BIG DATA: ZEBRAFISH AS A MODEL FOR CARDIOVASCULAR AND METABOLIC DISEASE.

Authors:  Philipp Gut; Sven Reischauer; Didier Y R Stainier; Rima Arnaout
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 4.  piggyBac-ing models and new therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Lauren E Woodard; Matthew H Wilson
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 19.536

5.  Vaccination with a piggyBac plasmid with transgene integration potential leads to sustained antigen expression and CD8(+) T cell responses.

Authors:  Pietro Bertino; Johann Urschitz; Fukun W Hoffmann; Bo Ra You; Aaron H Rose; Woo Hyun Park; Stefan Moisyadi; Peter R Hoffmann
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  Transposons As Tools for Functional Genomics in Vertebrate Models.

Authors:  Koichi Kawakami; David A Largaespada; Zoltán Ivics
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Genome-wide transposon screening and quantitative insertion site sequencing for cancer gene discovery in mice.

Authors:  Mathias J Friedrich; Lena Rad; Iraad F Bronner; Alexander Strong; Wei Wang; Julia Weber; Matthew Mayho; Hannes Ponstingl; Thomas Engleitner; Carolyn Grove; Anja Pfaus; Dieter Saur; Juan Cadiñanos; Michael A Quail; George S Vassiliou; Pentao Liu; Allan Bradley; Roland Rad
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  The piggyBac-derived protein 5 (PGBD5) transposes both the closely and the distantly related piggyBac-like elements Tcr-pble and Ifp2.

Authors:  Laura Helou; Linda Beauclair; Hugues Dardente; Benoît Piégu; Louis Tsakou-Ngouafo; Thierry Lecomte; Alex Kentsis; Pierre Pontarotti; Yves Bigot
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  The C-terminal Domain of piggyBac Transposase Is Not Required for DNA Transposition.

Authors:  Laura Helou; Linda Beauclair; Hugues Dardente; Peter Arensburger; Nicolas Buisine; Yan Jaszczyszyn; Florian Guillou; Thierry Lecomte; Alex Kentsis; Yves Bigot
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 10.  Cancer gene discovery: exploiting insertional mutagenesis.

Authors:  Marco Ranzani; Stefano Annunziato; David J Adams; Eugenio Montini
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 5.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.