Literature DB >> 23358191

Relative impact of incorporating pharmacokinetics on predicting in vivo hazard and mode of action from high-throughput in vitro toxicity assays.

Barbara A Wetmore1, John F Wambaugh, Stephen S Ferguson, Lili Li, Harvey J Clewell, Richard S Judson, Kimberly Freeman, Wenjun Bao, Mark A Sochaski, Tzu-Ming Chu, Michael B Black, Eric Healy, Brittany Allen, Melvin E Andersen, Russell D Wolfinger, Russell S Thomas.   

Abstract

The use of high-throughput in vitro assays has been proposed to play a significant role in the future of toxicity testing. In this study, rat hepatic metabolic clearance and plasma protein binding were measured for 59 ToxCast phase I chemicals. Computational in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation was used to estimate the daily dose in a rat, called the oral equivalent dose, which would result in steady-state in vivo blood concentrations equivalent to the AC 50 or lowest effective concentration (LEC) across more than 600 ToxCast phase I in vitro assays. Statistical classification analysis was performed using either oral equivalent doses or unadjusted AC 50 /LEC values for the in vitro assays to predict the in vivo effects of the 59 chemicals. Adjusting the in vitro assays for pharmacokinetics did not improve the ability to predict in vivo effects as either a discrete (yes or no) response or a low effect level (LEL) on a continuous dose scale. Interestingly, a comparison of the in vitro assay with the lowest oral equivalent dose with the in vivo endpoint with the lowest LEL suggested that the lowest oral equivalent dose may provide a conservative estimate of the point of departure for a chemical in a dose-response assessment. Furthermore, comparing the oral equivalent doses for the in vitro assays with the in vivo dose range that resulted in adverse effects identified more coincident in vitro assays across chemicals than expected by chance, suggesting that the approach may also be used to identify potential molecular initiating events leading to adversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23358191     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kft012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  43 in total

1.  Integrated Model of Chemical Perturbations of a Biological Pathway Using 18 In Vitro High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Estrogen Receptor.

Authors:  Richard S Judson; Felicia Maria Magpantay; Vijay Chickarmane; Cymra Haskell; Nessy Tania; Jean Taylor; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Daniel M Rotroff; Dayne L Filer; Keith A Houck; Matthew T Martin; Nisha Sipes; Ann M Richard; Kamel Mansouri; R Woodrow Setzer; Thomas B Knudsen; Kevin M Crofton; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Toxicokinetic Triage for Environmental Chemicals.

Authors:  John F Wambaugh; Barbara A Wetmore; Robert Pearce; Cory Strope; Rocky Goldsmith; James P Sluka; Alexander Sedykh; Alex Tropsha; Sieto Bosgra; Imran Shah; Richard Judson; Russell S Thomas; R Woodrow Setzer
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  FutureTox II: in vitro data and in silico models for predictive toxicology.

Authors:  Thomas B Knudsen; Douglas A Keller; Miriam Sander; Edward W Carney; Nancy G Doerrer; David L Eaton; Suzanne Compton Fitzpatrick; Kenneth L Hastings; Donna L Mendrick; Raymond R Tice; Paul B Watkins; Maurice Whelan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  From the exposome to mechanistic understanding of chemical-induced adverse effects.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Jörg Hackermüller; Tobias Polte; Stefan Scholz; Achim Aigner; Rolf Altenburger; Alexander Böhme; Stephanie K Bopp; Werner Brack; Wibke Busch; Marc Chadeau-Hyam; Adrian Covaci; Adolf Eisenträger; James J Galligan; Natalia Garcia-Reyero; Thomas Hartung; Michaela Hein; Gunda Herberth; Annika Jahnke; Jos Kleinjans; Nils Klüver; Martin Krauss; Marja Lamoree; Irina Lehmann; Till Luckenbach; Gary W Miller; Andrea Müller; David H Phillips; Thorsten Reemtsma; Ulrike Rolle-Kampczyk; Gerrit Schüürmann; Benno Schwikowski; Yu-Mei Tan; Saskia Trump; Susanne Walter-Rohde; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  FutureTox III: Bridges for Translation.

Authors:  Daland R Juberg; Thomas B Knudsen; Miriam Sander; Nancy B Beck; Elaine M Faustman; Donna L Mendrick; John R Fowle; Thomas Hartung; Raymond R Tice; Emmanuel Lemazurier; Richard A Becker; Suzanne Compton Fitzpatrick; George P Daston; Alison Harrill; Ronald N Hines; Douglas A Keller; John C Lipscomb; David Watson; Tina Bahadori; Kevin M Crofton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Challenges in working towards an internal threshold of toxicological concern (iTTC) for use in the safety assessment of cosmetics: Discussions from the Cosmetics Europe iTTC Working Group workshop.

Authors:  Corie A Ellison; Karen L Blackburn; Paul L Carmichael; Harvey J Clewell; Mark T D Cronin; Bertrand Desprez; Sylvia E Escher; Steve S Ferguson; Sébastien Grégoire; Nicola J Hewitt; Heli M Hollnagel; Martina Klaric; Atish Patel; Sabrina Salhi; Andreas Schepky; Barbara G Schmitt; John F Wambaugh; Andrew Worth
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Completing the Link between Exposure Science and Toxicology for Improved Environmental Health Decision Making: The Aggregate Exposure Pathway Framework.

Authors:  Justin G Teeguarden; Yu-Mei Tan; Stephen W Edwards; Jeremy A Leonard; Kim A Anderson; Richard A Corley; Molly L Kile; Staci M Simonich; David Stone; Robert L Tanguay; Katrina M Waters; Stacey L Harper; David E Williams
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  An Intuitive Approach for Predicting Potential Human Health Risk with the Tox21 10k Library.

Authors:  Nisha S Sipes; John F Wambaugh; Robert Pearce; Scott S Auerbach; Barbara A Wetmore; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Andrew J Shapiro; Daniel Svoboda; Michael J DeVito; Stephen S Ferguson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  The Next Generation Blueprint of Computational Toxicology at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Authors:  Russell S Thomas; Tina Bahadori; Timothy J Buckley; John Cowden; Chad Deisenroth; Kathie L Dionisio; Jeffrey B Frithsen; Christopher M Grulke; Maureen R Gwinn; Joshua A Harrill; Mark Higuchi; Keith A Houck; Michael F Hughes; E Sidney Hunter; Kristin K Isaacs; Richard S Judson; Thomas B Knudsen; Jason C Lambert; Monica Linnenbrink; Todd M Martin; Seth R Newton; Stephanie Padilla; Grace Patlewicz; Katie Paul-Friedman; Katherine A Phillips; Ann M Richard; Reeder Sams; Timothy J Shafer; R Woodrow Setzer; Imran Shah; Jane E Simmons; Steven O Simmons; Amar Singh; Jon R Sobus; Mark Strynar; Adam Swank; Rogelio Tornero-Valez; Elin M Ulrich; Daniel L Villeneuve; John F Wambaugh; Barbara A Wetmore; Antony J Williams
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Evaluating In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation of Toxicokinetics.

Authors:  John F Wambaugh; Michael F Hughes; Caroline L Ring; Denise K MacMillan; Jermaine Ford; Timothy R Fennell; Sherry R Black; Rodney W Snyder; Nisha S Sipes; Barbara A Wetmore; Joost Westerhout; R Woodrow Setzer; Robert G Pearce; Jane Ellen Simmons; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.