Literature DB >> 23357904

Controlled cavitation to augment SWL stone comminution: mechanistic insights in vitro.

Alexander P Duryea1, William W Roberts, Charles A Cain, Timothy L Hall.   

Abstract

Stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has been documented to result from mechanical stresses conferred directly to the stone, as well as the activity of cavitational microbubbles. Studies have demonstrated that the presence of this cavitation activity is crucial for stone subdivision; however, its exact role in the comminution process remains somewhat weakly defined, in part because it is difficult to isolate the cavitational component from the shock waves themselves. In this study, we further explored the importance of cavitation in SWL stone comminution through the use of histotripsy ultrasound therapy. Histotripsy was used to target model stones designed to mimic the mid-range tensile fracture strength of naturally occurring cystine calculi with controlled cavitation at strategic time points in the SWL comminution process. All SWL was applied at a peak positive pressure (p+) of 34 MPa and a peak negative pressure (p-) of 8 MPa; a shock rate of 1 Hz was used. Histotripsy pulses had a p- of 33 MPa and were applied at a pulse repetition frequency (PRF) of 100 Hz. Ten model stones were sonicated in vitro with each of five different treatment schemes: A) 10 min of SWL (600 shocks) with 0.7 s of histotripsy interleaved between successive shocks (totaling to 42 000 pulses); B) 10 min of SWL (600 shocks) followed by 10 min of histotripsy applied in 0.7-s bursts (1 burst per second, totaling to 42 000 pulses); C) 10 min of histotripsy applied in 0.7-s bursts (42 000 pulses) followed by 10 min of SWL (600 shocks); D) 10 min of SWL only (600 shocks); E) 10 min of histotripsy only, applied in 0.7-s bursts (42 000 pulses). Following sonication, debris was collected and sieved through 8-, 6-, 4-, and 2-mm filters. It was found that scheme D, SWL only, generated a broad range of fragment sizes, with an average of 14.9 ± 24.1% of the original stone mass remaining > 8 mm. Scheme E, histotripsy only, eroded the surface of stones to tiny particulate debris that was small enough to pass through the finest filter used in this study (<2 mm), leaving behind a single primary stone piece (>8 mm) with mass 85.1 ± 1.6% of the original following truncated sonication. The combination of SWL and histotripsy (schemes A, B, and C) resulted in a shift in the size distribution toward smaller fragments and complete elimination of debris > 8 mm. When histotripsy-controlled cavitation was applied following SWL (B), the increase in exposed stone surface area afforded by shock wave stone subdivision led to enhanced cavitation erosion. When histotripsy-controlled cavitation was applied before SWL (C), it is likely that stone surface defects induced by cavitation erosion provided sites for crack nucleation and accelerated shock wave stone subdivision. Both of these effects are likely at play in the interleaved therapy (A), although shielding of shock waves by remnant histotripsy microbubble nuclei may have limited the efficacy of this scheme. Nevertheless, these results demonstrate the important role played by cavitation in the stone comminution process, and suggest that the application of controlled cavitation at strategic time points can provide an adjunct to traditional SWL therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23357904      PMCID: PMC3777638          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  37 in total

1.  Stone fragmentation during shock wave lithotripsy is improved by slowing the shock wave rate: studies with a new animal model.

Authors:  Ryan F Paterson; David A Lifshitz; James E Lingeman; Andrew P Evan; Bret A Connors; Naomi S Fineberg; James C Williams; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion.

Authors:  Zhen Xu; Achiau Ludomirsky; Lucy Y Eun; Timothy L Hall; Binh C Tran; J Brian Fowlkes; Charles A Cain
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Optimization of treatment strategy used during shockwave lithotripsy to maximize stone fragmentation efficiency.

Authors:  Daniel Z Yong; Michael E Lipkin; W Neal Simmons; Georgy Sankin; David M Albala; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  An experimental shock wave generator for lithotripsy studies.

Authors:  A J Coleman; J E Saunders; M J Choi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Cavitation microjets as a contributory mechanism for renal calculi disintegration in ESWL.

Authors:  L A Crum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  A mechanism of gallstone destruction by extracorporeal shock waves.

Authors:  M Delius; W Brendel; G Heine
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1988-04

7.  Acoustic cavitation generated by an extracorporeal shockwave lithotripter.

Authors:  A J Coleman; J E Saunders; L A Crum; M Dyson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  The mechanisms of stone disintegration by shock waves.

Authors:  W Sass; M Bräunlich; H P Dreyer; E Matura; W Folberth; H G Preismeyer; J Seifert
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Morphology of urinary stone particles resulting from ESWL treatment.

Authors:  S R Khan; R L Hackett; B Finlayson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  An experimental model for the systematic investigation of stone fracture by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J P Whelan; B Finlayson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Engineering Better Lithotripters.

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Enhanced High-Rate Shockwave Lithotripsy Stone Comminution in an In Vivo Porcine Model Using Acoustic Bubble Coalescence.

Authors:  Hedieh Alavi Tamaddoni; William W Roberts; Alexander P Duryea; Charles A Cain; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Enhanced shockwave lithotripsy with active cavitation mitigation.

Authors:  Hedieh Alavi Tamaddoni; William W Roberts; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Removal of residual cavitation nuclei to enhance histotripsy erosion of model urinary stones.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; William W Roberts; Charles A Cain; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 5.  Development and translation of histotripsy: current status and future directions.

Authors:  William W Roberts
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.309

6.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: An opinion on its future.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Marie-Claire Rassweiler; Thomas Frede; Peter Alken
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.