Literature DB >> 25965682

Removal of residual cavitation nuclei to enhance histotripsy erosion of model urinary stones.

Alexander P Duryea, William W Roberts, Charles A Cain, Timothy L Hall.   

Abstract

Histotripsy has been shown to be an effective treatment for model kidney stones, eroding their surface to tiny particulate debris via a cavitational bubble cloud. However, similar to shock wave lithotripsy, histotripsy stone treatments display a rate-dependent efficacy, with pulses applied at a low rate generating more efficient stone erosion in comparison with those applied at a high rate. This is hypothesized to be the result of residual cavitation bubble nuclei generated by bubble cloud collapse. Although the histotripsy bubble cloud only lasts on the order of 100 μs, these microscopic remnant bubbles can persist on the order of 1 s, inducing direct attenuation of subsequent histotripsy pulses and influencing bubble cloud dynamics. In an effort to mitigate these effects, we have developed a novel strategy to actively remove residual cavitation nuclei from the field using low-amplitude ultrasound pulses. Previous work has demonstrated that with selection of the appropriate acoustic parameters these bubble removal pulses can stimulate the aggregation and subsequent coalescence of microscopic bubble nuclei, effectively deleting them from the target volume. Here, we incorporate bubble removal pulses in histotripsy treatment of model kidney stones. It was found that when histotripsy is applied at low rate (1 Hz), bubble removal does not produce a statistically significant change in erosion. At higher pulse rates of 10, 100, and 500 Hz, incorporating bubble removal results in 3.7-, 7.5-, and 2.7-fold increases in stone erosion, respectively. High-speed imaging indicates that the introduction of bubble removal pulses allows bubble cloud dynamics resulting from high pulse rates to more closely approximate those generated at the low rate of 1 Hz. These results corroborate previous work in the field of shock wave lithotripsy regarding the ill effects of residual bubble nuclei, and suggest that high treatment efficiency can be recovered at high pulse rates through appropriate manipulation of the cavitation environment surrounding the stone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25965682      PMCID: PMC4430129          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2015.7001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  38 in total

1.  A dual passive cavitation detector for localized detection of lithotripsy-induced cavitation in vitro.

Authors:  R O Cleveland; O A Sapozhnikov; M R Bailey; L A Crum
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of cavitational activity in fragmentation processes by lithotripters.

Authors:  W Sass; H P Dreyer; S Kettermann; J Seifert
Journal:  J Stone Dis       Date:  1992-07

3.  Improvement of stone comminution by slow delivery rate of shock waves in extracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Yuji Kato; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Junichi Hori; Mitsuhiko Okuyama; Hidehiro Kakizaki
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.369

4.  Optical and acoustic monitoring of bubble cloud dynamics at a tissue-fluid interface in ultrasound tissue erosion.

Authors:  Zhen Xu; Timothy L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes; Charles A Cain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Influence of shock wave pressure amplitude and pulse repetition frequency on the lifespan, size and number of transient cavities in the field of an electromagnetic lithotripter.

Authors:  P Huber; K Jöchle; J Debus
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Removal of residual nuclei following a cavitation event using low-amplitude ultrasound.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; Charles A Cain; Hedieh A Tamaddoni; William W Roberts; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Khaled Madbouly; Abdel Moneim El-Tiraifi; Mohamed Seida; Salah R El-Faqih; Ramiz Atassi; Riyadh F Talic
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The role of stress waves and cavitation in stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Songlin Zhu; Franklin H Cocks; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Transient acoustic cavitation in gallstone fragmentation: a study of gallstones fragmented in vivo.

Authors:  N Vakil; E C Everbach
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Does a slower treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary kidney or ureteral stones?

Authors:  Job Chacko; Michael Moore; Noel Sankey; Paramjit S Chandhoke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  9 in total

1.  Efficacy of histotripsy combined with rt-PA in vitro.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Kevin J Haworth; Himanshu Shekhar; Adam D Maxwell; Tao Peng; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  The influence of gas diffusion on bubble persistence in shock-scattering histotripsy.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Viktor Bollen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  For Whom the Bubble Grows: Physical Principles of Bubble Nucleation and Dynamics in Histotripsy Ultrasound Therapy.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Eli Vlaisavljevich; Adam D Maxwell
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Post Hoc Analysis of Passive Cavitation Imaging for Classification of Histotripsy-Induced Liquefaction in Vitro.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Kevin J Haworth; Adam D Maxwell; Christy K Holland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Enhanced shockwave lithotripsy with active cavitation mitigation.

Authors:  Hedieh Alavi Tamaddoni; William W Roberts; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Acoustic Methods for Increasing the Cavitation Initiation Pressure Threshold.

Authors:  Hedieh Alavi Tamaddoni; Alexander P Duryea; Eli Vlaisavljevich; Zhen Xu; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  The influence of medium elasticity on the prediction of histotripsy-induced bubble expansion and erythrocyte viability.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Observation and modulation of the dissolution of histotripsy-induced bubble clouds with high-frame rate plane wave imaging.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Samuel A Hendley; Gregory J Anthony; Viktor Bollen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Histotripsy: the first noninvasive, non-ionizing, non-thermal ablation technique based on ultrasound.

Authors:  Zhen Xu; Timothy L Hall; Eli Vlaisavljevich; Fred T Lee
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 3.753

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.