Literature DB >> 23355145

How to successfully implement a robotic pediatric surgery program: lessons learned after 96 procedures.

Guénolée de Lambert1, Laurent Fourcade, Joachim Centi, Fabien Fredon, Karim Braik, Caroline Szwarc, Bernard Longis, Hubert Lardy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both our teams were the first to implement pediatric robotic surgery in France. The aim of this study was to define the key points we brought to light so other pediatric teams that want to set up a robotic surgery program will benefit.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all children who underwent robotic surgery between Nov 2007 and June 2011 in both departments, including patient data, installation and changes, operative time, hospital stay, intraoperative complications, and postoperative outcome. The department's internal organization, the organization within the hospital complex, and cost were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 96 procedures were evaluated. There were 38 girls and 56 boys with average age at surgery of 7.6 years (range, 0.7-18 years) and average weight of 26 kg (range, 6-77 kg). Thirty-six patients had general surgery, 57 patients urologic surgery, and 1 thoracic surgery. Overall average operative time was 189 min (range, 70-550 min), and average hospital stay was 6.4 days (range, 2-24 days). The procedures of 3 patients were converted. Median follow-up was 18 months (range, 0.5-43 months). Robotic surgical procedure had an extra cost of <euro>1934 compared to conventional open surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience was similar to the findings described in the literature for feasibility, security, and patient outcomes; we had an overall operative success rate of 97 %. Three main actors are concerned in the implementation of a robotic pediatric surgery program: surgeons and anesthetists, nurses, and the administration. The surgeon is at the starting point with motivation for minimally invasive surgery without laparoscopic constraints. We found that it was possible to implement a long-lasting robotic surgery program with comparable quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23355145     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2729-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  45 in total

1.  Robotic surgery and resident training.

Authors:  D A De Ugarte; D A Etzioni; C Gracia; J B Atkinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robotics in pediatric surgery: perspectives for imaging.

Authors:  Adrien J Kant; Michael D Klein; Scott E Langenburg
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-02-18

Review 3.  Current status of robotic surgery in pediatric urology.

Authors:  Asif Muneer; Manit Arya; Iqbal S Shergill; Davendra Sharma; Mohammed Y Hammadeh; Imran Mushtaq
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy: complete intracorporeal--initial case report.

Authors:  Mohan S Gundeti; Michael K Eng; W Stuart Reynolds; Gregory P Zagaja
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  A prospective study comparing operative time in conventional laparoscopic and robotically assisted Thal semifundoplication in children.

Authors:  Mark Lehnert; Bernd Richter; Peter A Beyer; Klaus Heller
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Early experiences of robotic surgery in children.

Authors:  C N Gutt; B Markus; Z G Kim; D Meininger; L Brinkmann; K Heller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Pediatric robotic surgery: lessons from a clinical experience.

Authors:  Michael D Klein; Scott E Langenburg; Mustafa Kabeer; Attila Lorincz; Colin G Knight
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.878

8.  Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience.

Authors:  Patrick W Mufarrij; Michael Woods; Ojas D Shah; Michael A Palese; Aaron D Berger; Raju Thomas; Michael D Stifelman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy: description of technique.

Authors:  Carlo C Passerotti; David A Diamond; Joseph G Borer; Brian H Eisner; Glen Barrisford; Hiep T Nguyen
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Robot-assisted urologic surgery: safety and feasibility in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Ilya A Volfson; Ravi Munver; Michael Esposito; George Dakwar; Moneer Hanna; Jeffrey A Stock
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  8 in total

1.  Education and training in pediatric robotic surgery: lessons learned from an inaugural multinational workshop.

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; Erik K Mayer; Juan I Camps; Lars H Olsen; Gloria Pelizzo; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi; Azad S Najmaldin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-10-17

2.  A comparative cost analysis of robotic-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery and open surgery: the necessity of investing knowledgeably.

Authors:  Giorgia Tedesco; Francesco C Faggiano; Erica Leo; Pietro Derrico; Matteo Ritrovato
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Pediatric robotic surgery: issues in management-expert consensus from the Italian Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SARNePI) and the Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery (SICP).

Authors:  Simonetta Tesoro; Piergiorgio Gamba; Mirko Bertozzi; Rachele Borgogni; Fabio Caramelli; Giovanni Cobellis; Giuseppe Cortese; Ciro Esposito; Tommaso Gargano; Rossella Garra; Giulia Mantovani; Laura Marchesini; Simonetta Mencherini; Mario Messina; Gerald Rogan Neba; Gloria Pelizzo; Simone Pizzi; Giovanna Riccipetitoni; Alessandro Simonini; Costanza Tognon; Mario Lima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 4.  Robotically Assisted Surgery in Children-A Perspective.

Authors:  Thomas Franz Krebs; Isabel Schnorr; Pascal Heye; Franz-Martin Häcker
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-06

5.  A comparison of robotic surgery in children weighing above and below 15.0 kg: size does not affect surgery success.

Authors:  Quentin Ballouhey; Thierry Villemagne; Jérôme Cros; Caroline Szwarc; Karim Braik; Bernard Longis; Hubert Lardy; Laurent Fourcade
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Robotic Surgery may Not "Make the Cut" in Pediatrics.

Authors:  Nicholas E Bruns; Oliver S Soldes; Todd A Ponsky
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery: Prospective Series of 186 Pediatric Surgeries.

Authors:  Mario Navarrete Arellano; Francisco Garibay González
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.418

8.  Ten years of paediatric robotic surgery: Lessons learned.

Authors:  Martin Salö; Linda Bonnor; Christina Graneli; Pernilla Stenström; Magnus Anderberg
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.483

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.