Literature DB >> 36121503

Pediatric robotic surgery: issues in management-expert consensus from the Italian Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SARNePI) and the Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery (SICP).

Simonetta Tesoro1, Piergiorgio Gamba2, Mirko Bertozzi3, Rachele Borgogni4, Fabio Caramelli5, Giovanni Cobellis6, Giuseppe Cortese7, Ciro Esposito4, Tommaso Gargano8, Rossella Garra9, Giulia Mantovani10, Laura Marchesini1, Simonetta Mencherini11, Mario Messina12, Gerald Rogan Neba13, Gloria Pelizzo14,15, Simone Pizzi13, Giovanna Riccipetitoni3, Alessandro Simonini13, Costanza Tognon10, Mario Lima8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pediatric robotic-assisted surgeries have increased in recent years; however, guidance documents are still lacking. This study aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations, or best practice statements when evidence is lacking or inadequate, to assist surgical teams internationally.
METHODS: A joint consensus taskforce of anesthesiologists and surgeons from the Italian Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SARNePI) and the Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery (SICP) have identified critical areas and reviewed the available evidence. The taskforce comprised 21 experts representing the fields of anesthesia (n = 11) and surgery (n = 10) from clinical centers performing pediatric robotic surgery in the Italian cities of Ancona, Bologna, Milan, Naples, Padua, Pavia, Perugia, Rome, Siena, and Verona. Between December 2020 and September 2021, three meetings, two Delphi rounds, and a final consensus conference took place.
RESULTS: During the first planning meeting, the panel agreed on the specific objectives, the definitions to apply, and precise methodology. The project was structured into three subtopics: (i) preoperative patient assessment and preparation; (ii) intraoperative management (surgical and anesthesiologic); and (iii) postoperative procedures. Within these phases, the panel agreed to address a total of 18 relevant areas, which spanned preoperative patient assessment and patient selection, anesthesiology, critical care medicine, respiratory care, prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pain management.
CONCLUSION: Collaboration among surgeons and anesthesiologists will be increasingly important for achieving safe and effective RAS procedures. These recommendations will provide a review for those who already have relevant experience and should be particularly useful for those starting a new program.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesiology; Consensus; Pediatric minimally invasive surgery; Pediatric robotically assisted surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 36121503     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09577-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  159 in total

1.  The APpendicitis PEdiatric (APPE) score: a new diagnostic tool in suspected pediatric acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Mario Lima; Dora Persichetti-Proietti; Neil Di Salvo; Claudio Antonellini; Michele Libri; Beatrice Randi; Michela Maffi; Tommaso Gargano; Giovanni Ruggeri; Vincenzo Davide Catania
Journal:  Pediatr Med Chir       Date:  2019-04-02

Review 2.  Letter to the Editor: Robot-Assisted and Minimally Invasive Pediatric Surgery and Urology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Short Literature Review.

Authors:  Ciro Esposito; Lorenzo Masieri; Marco Castagnetti; Felice Crocetto; Maria Escolino
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 3.  Current controversies in pediatric urologic robotic surgery.

Authors:  Lorenzo F M Trevisani; Hiep T Nguyen
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.309

4.  Anesthesia experience of pediatric robotic surgery in a University Hospital.

Authors:  Wadha Mubarak Alotaibi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-06-13

Review 5.  Pediatric Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Naomi-Liza Denning; Michelle P Kallis; Jose M Prince
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 6.  Joint consensus on abdominal robotic surgery and anesthesia from a task force of the SIAARTI and SIC.

Authors:  Antonio Corcione; Pierluigi Angelini; Lapo Bencini; Elisabetta Bertellini; Felice Borghi; Claudio Buccelli; Giuseppe Coletta; Clelia Esposito; Vincenzo Graziano; Fabio Guarracino; Domenico Marchi; Pasquale Misitano; Anna M Mori; Mariano Paternoster; Vincenzo Pennestrì; Vittorio Perrone; Luigi Pugliese; Stefano Romagnoli; Luigia Scudeller; Francesco Corcione
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  How to successfully implement a robotic pediatric surgery program: lessons learned after 96 procedures.

Authors:  Guénolée de Lambert; Laurent Fourcade; Joachim Centi; Fabien Fredon; Karim Braik; Caroline Szwarc; Bernard Longis; Hubert Lardy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Anesthetic considerations and goals in robotic pediatric surgery: a narrative review.

Authors:  Priyanka Mishra; Bhavna Gupta; Amborish Nath
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 9.  Robotic Urologic Surgery in Infants: Results and Complications.

Authors:  Christina Kim
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 10.  The Future of Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology: Upcoming Technology and Evolution Within the Field.

Authors:  Kunj R Sheth; Chester J Koh
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.