Literature DB >> 23348945

Bat flight with bad wings: is flight metabolism affected by damaged wings?

Christian C Voigt1.   

Abstract

Infection of North American bats with the keratin-digesting fungus Geomyces destructans often results in holes and ruptures of wing membranes, yet it is unknown whether flight performance and metabolism of bats are altered by such injuries. I conducted flight experiments in a circular flight arena with Myotis albescens and M. nigricans individuals with an intact or ruptured trailing edge of one of the plagiopatagial membranes. In both species, individuals with damaged wings were lighter, had a higher aspect ratio (squared wing span divided by wing area) and an increased wing loading (weight divided by wing area) than conspecifics with intact wings. Bats with an asymmetric reduction of the wing area flew at similar speeds to conspecifics with intact wings but performed fewer flight manoeuvres. Individuals with damaged wings showed lower metabolic rates during flight than conspecifics with intact wings, even when controlling for body mass differences; the difference in mass-specific metabolic rate may be attributable to the lower number of flight manoeuvres (U-turns) by bats with damaged wings compared with conspecifics with intact wings. Possibly, bats compensated for an asymmetric reduction in wing area by lowering their body mass and avoiding flight manoeuvres. In conclusion, it may be that bats suffer from moderate wing damage not directly, by experiencing increased metabolic rate, but indirectly, by a reduced manoeuvrability and foraging success. This could impede a bat's ability to gain sufficient body mass before hibernation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23348945     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.079509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Flies compensate for unilateral wing damage through modular adjustments of wing and body kinematics.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; Nicole A Iwasaki; Michael J Elzinga; Johan M Melis; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates.

Authors:  Diana D Chin; Laura Y Matloff; Amanda Kay Stowers; Emily R Tucci; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches.

Authors:  Daniela A Schmieder; Hugo A Benítez; Ivailo M Borissov; Carmelo Fruciano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Seasonal and reproductive effects on wound healing in the flight membranes of captive big brown bats.

Authors:  Alejandra Ceballos-Vasquez; John R Caldwell; Paul A Faure
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.422

5.  Alterations in the health of hibernating bats under pathogen pressure.

Authors:  Hana Bandouchova; Tomáš Bartonička; Hana Berkova; Jiri Brichta; Tomasz Kokurewicz; Veronika Kovacova; Petr Linhart; Vladimir Piacek; Jiri Pikula; Alexandra Zahradníková; Jan Zukal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  White-nose syndrome pathology grading in Nearctic and Palearctic bats.

Authors:  Jiri Pikula; Sybill K Amelon; Hana Bandouchova; Tomáš Bartonička; Hana Berkova; Jiri Brichta; Sarah Hooper; Tomasz Kokurewicz; Miroslav Kolarik; Bernd Köllner; Veronika Kovacova; Petr Linhart; Vladimir Piacek; Gregory G Turner; Jan Zukal; Natália Martínková
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.