Hana Bandouchova1, Tomáš Bartonička2, Hana Berkova3, Jiri Brichta1, Tomasz Kokurewicz4, Veronika Kovacova1, Petr Linhart1, Vladimir Piacek1, Jiri Pikula5,6, Alexandra Zahradníková7, Jan Zukal3. 1. Department of Ecology and Diseases of Game, Fish and Bees, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. 2. Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. 3. Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic. 4. Institute of Biology, Department of Vertebrate Ecology and Palaeontology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland. 5. Department of Ecology and Diseases of Game, Fish and Bees, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. pikulaj@vfu.cz. 6. CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. pikulaj@vfu.cz. 7. Department of Muscle Cell Research, Institute of Molecular Physiology and Genetics, Centre of Biosciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Abstract
In underground hibernacula temperate northern hemisphere bats are exposed to Pseudogymnoascus destructans, the fungal agent of white-nose syndrome. While pathological and epidemiological data suggest that Palearctic bats tolerate this infection, we lack knowledge about bat health under pathogen pressure. Here we report blood profiles, along with body mass index (BMI), infection intensity and hibernation temperature, in greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis). We sampled three European hibernacula that differ in geomorphology and microclimatic conditions. Skin lesion counts differed between contralateral wings of a bat, suggesting variable exposure to the fungus. Analysis of blood parameters suggests a threshold of ca. 300 skin lesions on both wings, combined with poor hibernation conditions, may distinguish healthy bats from those with homeostatic disruption. Physiological effects manifested as mild metabolic acidosis, decreased glucose and peripheral blood eosinophilia which were strongly locality-dependent. Hibernating bats displaying blood homeostasis disruption had 2 °C lower body surface temperatures. A shallow BMI loss slope with increasing pathogen load suggested a high degree of infection tolerance. European greater mouse-eared bats generally survive P. destructans invasion, despite some health deterioration at higher infection intensities (dependant on hibernation conditions). Conservation measures should minimise additional stressors to conserve constrained body reserves of bats during hibernation.
In underground hibernacula temperate northern hemisphere bats are exposed to Pseudogymnoascus destructans, the fungal agent of white-nose syndrome. While pathological and epidemiological data suggest that Palearctic bats tolerate this infection, we lack knowledge about bat health under pathogen pressure. Here we report blood profiles, along with body mass index (BMI), infection intensity and hibernation temperature, in greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis). We sampled three European hibernacula that differ in geomorphology and microclimatic conditions. Skin lesion counts differed between contralateral wings of a bat, suggesting variable exposure to the fungus. Analysis of blood parameters suggests a threshold of ca. 300 skin lesions on both wings, combined with poor hibernation conditions, may distinguish healthy bats from those with homeostatic disruption. Physiological effects manifested as mild metabolic acidosis, decreased glucose and peripheral blood eosinophilia which were strongly locality-dependent. Hibernating bats displaying blood homeostasis disruption had 2 °C lower body surface temperatures. A shallow BMI loss slope with increasing pathogen load suggested a high degree of infection tolerance. European greater mouse-eared bats generally survive P. destructans invasion, despite some health deterioration at higher infection intensities (dependant on hibernation conditions). Conservation measures should minimise additional stressors to conserve constrained body reserves of bats during hibernation.
Life history theory suggests that organisms optimise their defences against pathogens by differential allocation of resources to support different physiological functions[1-4]. There is a trade-off mechanism applied to modulate investment into individual life history components[5,6]. Homeostasis and survival of hosts challenged with exposure to a pathogenic agent could be considered a physiological measure of health[2]. Host physiological status under pathogen pressure will be impacted by standard components of the ‘disease triangle’, i.e., host susceptibility, virulence of the infectious agent and environmental determinants. In general, hibernation, a slow life history strategy, is linked to higher survival rates[7]. Successful hibernation of mammals is constrained by their energy reserves, suitable microhabitat availability[8] and thermoregulatory behaviour[9]. Additional stressors may deplete the animal’s resources, resulting in adverse consequences.Skin, the largest organ of the body, acts as a barrier between the animal and its environment while providing multiple anatomic and physiological functions. A bat’s membranes are essential for flight, increasing the ratio of body mass to body surface. Moreover, naked flight membranes have a surface area eight times greater than that of fur-coated skin. This increases the area of potential exposure to dermatopathogens. In bats, healthy skin is essential for maintaining physiological homeostasis[10].In the northern temperate zone, hibernating bats are exposed to a non-systemic fungal infection that mainly affects the areas of skin without fur. Over the last decade, the fungus Pseudogymnoascus destructans has caused a devastating decline in North American bat populations[11-16]. During this time, there have been only sporadic cases of mortality in Eurasia[17-21]. In contrast to standard cutaneous dermatomycoses, the so-called white-nose syndrome (WNS) fungus invades living layers of skin[10,22,23].Despite considerable advances in our understanding of molecular pathogenesis and factors affecting the virulence of P. destructans infection[24-27], the fundamental pathophysiological mechanisms of mortality associated with WNS remain unconfirmed[10,28,29]. Adverse effects increase with the extent of wing membrane pathology. While early stages of skin infection induce a two-fold increase in fat energy utilisation[29], late-stage infected bats have altered torpor-arousal cycles, abnormal hibernation behaviour as well as emaciation and increased mortality[30]. Several studies of clinical blood parameters (e.g. electrolytes, acid-base balance, hydration status, haematology) in little brown bats, Myotis lucifugus, reveal that WNS disrupts blood homeostasis[29,31,32]. Interestingly, European P. destructans isolates are virulent and produce WNS in this North American bat species[33]. Infected bats have histopathology identical to skin lesions in Palearctic bat species[18-22]. P. destructans occurred in Europe before the outbreak of the Nearctic epidemic[34,35]. This, together with phylogenetic studies[36,37], indicates that North American species of bats might be naïve hosts to a fungal pathogen originating in the Palearctic region. Intercontinental and interspecies comparisons may provide greater insights into variation of host responses to fungal infection.Two defence mechanisms can evolve from host-pathogen interactions: resistance and tolerance[38-40]. Resistance protects the host by reducing the pathogen burden. As a consequence, prevalence of the agent in the host population decreases. In comparison, tolerant hosts limit the damage caused by the pathogen and remain healthy without mounting sterilising immunity[41], though prevalence remains high or even increases within the susceptible population. Host cost/benefit trade-offs from its response to infection should favour tolerance when disease severity allows survival and host adaptation[42]. As European bats infected with P. destructans display no population-level effects, they are thought to tolerate infection, despite high fungal loads and almost 100% prevalence[17,20,21]. Host tolerance and/or disease resistance can be measured as a regression slope between health and pathogen load[38,42].Here, we report on host-pathogen interactions in the greater mouse-eared bat (Myotis myotis), the European species showing highest skin infection intensity, based on blood parameters. We hypothesise that hibernating European bats are unable to maintain blood parameters within the normal physiological ranges found in healthy bats when exposed to the WNS fungal agent, and that blood homeostasis disruption could be related to infection intensity and hibernation temperature. We predict 1) a skin lesion threshold distinguishing healthy and diseased bats, 2) blood acidosis and a decrease of blood glucose in bats with high P. destructans infection intensity, and 3) a lower body mass index (BMI) in bats with blood homeostasis disruption. We also predict a reduced rate of BMI loss with increasing infection intensity, indicative of disease tolerance. An improved understanding of how hibernating bats optimise their health to survive pathogenic pressure will have positive ramifications for wildlife and conservation medicine.
Methods
Ethics statement
Each bat was handled in such a way as to minimise sampling distress and was released at the hibernaculum one hour after capture. Fieldwork and bat sampling was performed in accordance with Czech Law No. 114/1992 on Nature and Landscape Protection, based on permits 1662/MK/2012S/00775/MK/2012, 866/JS/2012 and 00356/KK/2008/AOPK issued by the Agency for Nature Conservation and Landscape Protection of the Czech Republic. Experimental procedures were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Czech Academy of Sciences (No. 169/2011). Sampling at the Nietoperek Natura 2000 site (Poland) was approved by the II Local Ethical Commission in Wrocław (No. 45/2015) and the Regional Nature Conservancy Management in Gorzów Wielkopolski (WPN-I-6205.10.2015.AI and WPN-I-6205.20.2016.AI). The authors were authorised to handle free-living bats under Czech Certificate of Competency No. CZ01341 (§17, Act No. 246/1992) and Polish Certificate of Competency in Experimental Procedures on Animals (Polish Laboratory Animal Science Association, Certificate No. 2413/2015).
Hibernacula studied
Seventy-nine bats were sampled at three important European hibernacula, the Nietoperek bunker (NIE; Poland), the Šimon and Juda mines (SJM; Czech Republic) and the Sloupsko-Šošůvské caves (SSC; Czech Republic), during the late hibernation period in 2015. Control sampling was undertaken at the Nietoperek bunker during March 2016 to evaluate infection dynamics. All three localities differ in geomorphology and microclimate conditions. No mass mortalities have been reported from any of the sites[43-46] and numbers of hibernating M. myotis have remained stable, or have increased slightly over recent years.The Nietoperek bat reserve lies in the underground corridors of an abandoned German military fortification from the central sector of the Międzyrzecz Fortified Front in western Poland (52°25′N, 15°32′E). The aboveground bunkers are connected by 3–4.5 m high and 2.5–4 m wide underground railway corridors. Sites preferred by hibernating M. myotis have a median temperature of 8.7 °C (min-max 6.1–9.9 °C), 100% relative humidity (min-max 77.5–100.0%) and 9 g/m3 absolute humidity (min-max 6–9 g/m3)[46].The Šimon and Juda mines comprise two gallery systems, the entrances of which open into a 10 m deep iron ore quarry. The mines were closed in 1870 and most galleries were flooded after World War I. While the galleries were drained between 1956 and 1957, no more mining took place. The lower gallery system has four horizontal storeys, each 2–2.5 m high, the upper system comprising an irregular labyrinth of galleries and chambers. Differences in geomorphology mean that each system has a different microclimate, the lower being colder, with temperatures rarely exceeding 5 °C (relative humidity close to 100%; absolute humidity 7–8 g/m3) and the upper having temperatures around 7 °C in most parts, though dropping close to the main entrance[47].The Sloupsko-Šošůvské caves comprise a natural karst system with 7 km of chasms, domes and corridors. The 8 m high and 20 m wide main entrance is located in the northern part of the cave. Due to their complicated geomorphology, microclimatic conditions vary widely. Hibernating bats mainly use those parts close to the main entrance (e.g. the Nicová and Eliška cave[45]) with mean annual temperatures fluctuating between 5.5 and 7.5 °C and an absolute humidity of 7–8 g/m3 [48].
Measurements of bat health
The body surface temperature of each hibernating bat was measured using a Ryatek contactless laser thermometer (Total Temperature Instrumentation Inc.) prior to its removal from the hibernaculum wall. Each bat was then sexed and its age estimated based on epiphyseal ossification of the thoracic limb fingers and tooth abrasion[49]. Callipers were used to measure forearm length and body mass was determined using a portable top-loading balance. BMI was calculated as body mass (g) divided by left forearm length (mm)[50].After a re-warming period of 60 minutes, the skin was disinfected with alcohol and a blood sample (100 µl) taken from the uropatagial vessel using a heparinised tube[51]. An i-STAT portable clinical analyser (EC8+ diagnostic cartridge, Abaxis, Union City, CA, USA) was used to measure sodium (Na, mmol/L), potassium (K, mmol/L), chloride (Cl, mmol/L), total dissolved carbon dioxide (tCO2, mmol/L), blood urea nitrogen (BUN, mmol/L), glucose (GLU, mmol/L), haematocrit (Hct, L/L), pH, partial dissolved carbon dioxide (pCO2, kPa), bicarbonate (HCO3, mmol/L), base excess (BE, mmol/L), anion gap (AnGap, mmol/L) and haemoglobin (Hb, g/L).A subsample was used to prepare a blood smear, which was then treated with Romanowsky stain. Differential white blood cell counts were determined by counting 100 leukocytes under oil immersion magnification and calculating the relative number of lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, basophils and eosinophils.
Measurement of infection intensity
Immediately following capture, the surface of the left wing was swabbed (FLOQ Swabs, Copan Flock Technologies srl, Brescia, Italy) in a standardised manner to collect fungal biomass. Fungal load was calculated using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Halden, Germany) was used to isolate fungal DNA from the wing swabs. A dual-probe TaqMan (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA) was used to quantify P. destructans DNA (ng per left wing area; triplicate samples) using a previously described protocol employing positive and negative controls and a dilution series calibration curve from a positive control[19,21,52,53]. Suspected fungal growths from other parts of the body (e.g. ears, muzzle) were collected for laboratory culture examination[12]. Skin lesions were enumerated by photographing both wings over a 368 nm ultra-violet (UV) lamp[19,21,54]. A 4 mm punch biopsy, centred over the lesion, was collected from each bat to confirm P. destructans infection on histopathology[22,23].
Statistical analysis
Normality of variable distribution was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Non-normally distributed variables were log transformed and rechecked. All parameters were normally distributed after transformation, with the exception of body surface temperature (W = 0.936, p = 0.005), haematocrit (W = 0.896, p < 0.001), haemoglobin (W = 0.896, p < 0.001) and percentage of eosinophils, monophils and basophils (Shapiro-Wilk tests, p < 0.001). In these cases, statistical analysis was conducted using non-parametric tests, i.e. the Kruskal-Wallis test, the Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman’s correlation. The slopes and intercepts of linear regressions were compared using the Student’s t-test.Haematological parameters did not differ between age classes (adult vs. sub-adult) or sexes (ANOVA and t-test); hence, the data were pooled for subsequent analyses. We scored the level of wing damage based on the total number of UV-fluorescing skin lesions on both wings as: 1 = 0 to 50 lesions, 2 = 51 to 250 lesions, 3 = 251 to 500 lesions, 4 = 501 to 1000 lesions and 5 = more than 1000 lesions. Effect of locality and wing-lesion score on blood parameters was tested using general linear mixed models (GLMM) with locality (hibernaculum) set as a random effect. As blood parameters were highly inter-correlated, we used principal component analysis (PCA) to evaluate inter-individual differences in distribution along axes linked with severity of skin infection, i.e. number of UV-fluorescing skin lesions.Data on fungal load, number of UV-fluorescing skin lesions and blood parameters from Nietoperek (Poland), the Šimon and Juda mines (Czech Republic) and the Sloupsko-šošůvské caves (Czech Republic) are presented in Supplementary Table S1.
Results
Relationship between number of skin lesions, body surface temperature, BMI and P. destructans load
The number of skin lesions fluctuated between 0 and 3782. One wing for a given individual always had significantly more lesions (Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Test; Z = 2.497, p = 0.013; Fig. 1), though the number of lesions on each wing was correlated (Spearman rank order correlation rs = 0.857, p < 0.05). Consequently, we used the sum of UV-fluorescing lesions from both wings as it more precisely expressed total skin infection severity. Number of lesions was positively correlated with P. destructans load and negatively with body surface temperature (Table 1). The decline in BMI with higher P. destructans load was the same at all localities, though the regression curve for the Sloupsko-Šošůvské caves did not differ significantly at its lower intercept (SSC vs. NIE t = −0.303, DF = 53, p = 0.382; SSC vs. SJM t = −0.141, DF = 32, p = 0.445) due to the lowered BMI of hibernating bats (Figs 2 and 3). When material from all localities and both years of sampling was pooled, the decline in BMI with increasing P. destructans load and number of skin lesions became statistically significant (P. destructans load F(74) = −2.955, p = 0.004; UV-fluorescing skin lesions F(75) = −2.461, p = 0.016).
Figure 1
Relationship between the number of skin lesions produced by P. destructans on the left and right wing of each bat. Displayed as a scatter plot of log-transformed data, it indicates a positive correlation between the left and right wing lesion counts. Points lying outside the 95% confidence intervals of the regression line show that one wing had more UV-fluorescing lesions than the contralateral wing in a given bat.
Table 1
Spearman rank order correlation between body parameters and infection parameters.
Variable
Number of skin lesions
Body surface temperature
Body mass index
Body surface temperature
−0.54
Body mass index
−0.15
−0.07
P. destructans load
0.69
−0.61
−0.12
Figures in bold are significantly different at α < 0.05.
Figure 2
Relationship between BMI and P. destructans load for bats from different localities. F- and p-values are given to demonstrate the effect of P. destructans load on bat BMI in the pooled material. Dots = Nietoperek (NIE); squares = Šimon and Juda mine (SJM); diamonds = Sloupsko-šošůvské cave (SSC); dashed line = regression line for pooled dataset.
Figure 3
Median BMI of bats from (1) different localities, and (2) with different wing-lesion scores. Midpoint = median, box = inter-quartile range, whiskers = non-outlier range, dots = outliers, stars = extremes. Groups marked with the same letter differ significantly.
Relationship between the number of skin lesions produced by P. destructans on the left and right wing of each bat. Displayed as a scatter plot of log-transformed data, it indicates a positive correlation between the left and right wing lesion counts. Points lying outside the 95% confidence intervals of the regression line show that one wing had more UV-fluorescing lesions than the contralateral wing in a given bat.Spearman rank order correlation between body parameters and infection parameters.Figures in bold are significantly different at α < 0.05.Relationship between BMI and P. destructans load for bats from different localities. F- and p-values are given to demonstrate the effect of P. destructans load on bat BMI in the pooled material. Dots = Nietoperek (NIE); squares = Šimon and Juda mine (SJM); diamonds = Sloupsko-šošůvské cave (SSC); dashed line = regression line for pooled dataset.Median BMI of bats from (1) different localities, and (2) with different wing-lesion scores. Midpoint = median, box = inter-quartile range, whiskers = non-outlier range, dots = outliers, stars = extremes. Groups marked with the same letter differ significantly.GLMM confirmed both the differences in P. destructans load (F = 8.106, p < 0.001) and BMI (F = 7.785, p < 0.001). While post-hoc univariate tests indicated locality as the main effect for P. destructans load; BMI was significantly influenced by both locality and wing-lesion score (Fig. 3). Highest BMI scores were recorded at lowest infection severity (score 1). Kruskal-Wallis tests confirmed a difference in body surface temperature for both locality (H(2, N = 57) = 49.826, p < 0.001) and wing-lesion score (H(4, N = 57) = 16.773, p = 0.002), hibernating bats with lowest body surface temperatures showing increased infection severity (Fig. 4).
Figure 4
Body surface temperature of hibernating bats with different wing-lesion scores. Midpoint = median, box = inter-quartile range, whiskers = non-outlier range, dots = outliers. Body surface temperature was significantly different between wing-lesion scores (Kruskal-Wallis test: H4,57 = 16.773; p = 0.002).
Body surface temperature of hibernating bats with different wing-lesion scores. Midpoint = median, box = inter-quartile range, whiskers = non-outlier range, dots = outliers. Body surface temperature was significantly different between wing-lesion scores (Kruskal-Wallis test: H4,57 = 16.773; p = 0.002).
Relationship of skin infection level to blood chemistry and haematology profile
Nine blood parameters were significantly affected by locality and wing-lesion score (Tables 2 and 3), the GLMM model explaining between 14.3 and 37.7% of variability. We used seven continuous blood parameters (excluding percentage of neutrophils and lymphocytes) for PCA analysis of samples from 2015, the first three components of which explained 92.5% of total variability. Acid-base variables (tCO2, pH, HCO3 and BE) displayed a strong negative correlation with the first component, electrolytes (Na and Cl) correlated positively with the second component and glucose negatively with the third component. The space defined by the first and third components provided the best separation between individuals (Fig. 5). Highest principal component values were observed in a single healthy individual (without UV-fluorescing skin lesions), its position subsequently being considered a new midpoint for the principal component axes. All individuals (n = 18) located in the upper right space were diagnosed with homeostasis disruption associated with skin infection, the three worst cases (top right position in Fig. 5) displaying infection intensities of 2394, 876 and 1490 lesions. As all bats from Nietoperek proved healthy, we took control samples during winter 2016 and repeated the PCA analysis with a larger sample size. While there was no difference in BMI and skin infection intensity in 2015 and 2016 (T-test; t = −1.598, p = 0.118, and t = 1.154, p = 0.256); P. destructans load was higher in 2015 than 2016 (T-test; t = 3.176, p = 0.003). PCA added seven new cases to those diagnosed with homeostasis disruption, including two from Nietoperek. Average number of skin lesions, P. destructans load, BMI and body surface temperature differed significantly between healthy and diseased bats (Table 4). We defined a theoretical breaking point (skin lesion threshold) for the manifestation of skin infection in disruption of blood parameters, based on the median between the 95% confidence intervals of the two groups (i.e. 328.5 skin lesions; Fig. 6). Six blood parameters differed between the groups defined by PCA; however, only glucose, skin lesion number, log P. destructans load and body surface temperature differed between the groups defined by the skin lesion threshold (Table 4).
Table 2
Summary statistics for general linear models of blood parameters, with wing-lesion score as a fixed factor and locality as a random factor.
Dependent Variable
Adjusted R2
df Model
df Residual
F
p
Na
0.143
6
52
2.609
0.028
K
0.059
6
52
1.602
0.165
Cl
0.158
6
50
2.749
0.022
tCO2
0.342
6
51
5.946
<0.001
Urea
−0.019
6
51
0.823
0.558
Glucose
0.152
6
51
2.705
0.023
pH
0.259
6
51
4.314
0.001
pCO2
0.072
6
51
1.739
0.131
HCO3
0.348
6
51
6.061
<0.001
Base excess
0.377
6
51
6.746
<0.001
Anion gap
0.005
6
46
1.045
0.409
Neutrophils
0.245
6
52
4.145
0.002
Lymphocytes
0.254
6
52
4.289
0.001
Figures in bold are significantly different at α < 0.05.
Table 3
Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test of locality and wing-lesion score impact on blood parameters.
Variable
Wing-lesion score
Locality
H
df
n
p
H
df
n
p
Haematocrit
2.613
4
58
0.625
0.222
2
58
0.895
Haemoglobin
2.613
4
58
0.625
0.222
2
58
0.895
Eosinophils
0.756
4
59
0.944
5.242
2
59
0.073
Monocytes
1.382
4
59
0.847
3.201
2
59
0.202
Basophils
1.400
4
59
0.844
0.025
2
59
0.988
Figure 5
(a) Bat dispersion and (b) projection of variables in blood parameter space based on PCA. The position of bats with no UV-fluorescing skin lesions and highest principal component values (grey dot) was used to define the midpoint of new principal component axes. Black dots = diseased, open dots = healthy; supplementary factors are marked by a star. Abbreviations: BE = base excess, glu = glucose, lymf = lymphocytes, neu = neutrophils.
Table 4
Difference between healthy and diseased hibernating bats in groups defined by a) principal component analysis (PCA) and b) UV spot threshold (total UV-fluorescing skin lesion number = 328.5).
Variables
Groups defined by PCA
Groups defined by skin lesion threshold
Mean healthy
Mean diseased
t
df
p
Mean healthy
Mean diseased
t
df
p
Na
154.177
151.333
1.521
73
0.133
153.811
151.955
0.961
73
0.340
K
6.62
7.1125
−1.564
73
0.122
6.738
6.873
−0.412
73
0.682
Cl
122.647
124.083
−0.756
73
0.452
122.962
123.455
−0.252
73
0.802
tCO2
24.902
22.958
2.109
73
0.038
24.698
23.273
1.488
73
0.141
Urea
20.492
24.217
−1.903
73
0.061
20.862
23.664
−1.381
73
0.171
Glucose
7.102
4.521
5.599
73
<0.001
6.700
5.255
2.683
73
0.009
Haematocrit
55.177
57.083
−1.799
73
0.076
55.717
55.955
−0.214
73
0.831
pH
7.294
7.249
3.037
73
0.003
7.286
7.262
1.540
73
0.128
pCO2
6.415
6.558
−0.646
73
0.52
6.474
6.431
0.190
73
0.850
HCO3
23.477
21.471
2.215
73
0.03
23.223
21.9
1.398
73
0.166
Base excess
−3.059
−5.833
2.599
73
0.011
−3.453
−5.136
1.495
73
0.139
Anion gap
14.813
13.238
2.260
67
0.027
14.500
13.895
0.817
67
0.417
Haemoglobin
187.549
194.083
−1.811
73
0.074
189.415
190.182
−0.203
73
0.840
Neutrophils
32.114
38.455
−1.346
55
0.184
31.974
39.737
−1.607
55
0.114
Lymphocytes
67.371
59.864
1.616
55
0.112
67.184
59.053
1.699
55
0.096
Eosinophils
0.457
1.273
−2.800
55
0.007
0.658
1.000
−1.075
55
0.288
Monocytes
0.286
0.364
−0.319
55
0.751
0.368
0.211
0.628
55
0.533
Basophils
0.114
0.046
0.579
55
0.565
0.132
0.000
1.080
55
0.285
Body surface temperature
7.906
5.933
4.326
72
<0.001
7.698
6.176
3.042
72
0.003
Body mass index
0.401
0.382
2.338
73
0.022
0.397
0.390
0.900
73
0.371
log P. destructans load
−1.102
−0.186
−3.584
71
<0.001
−1.168
0.064
−5.033
71
<0.001
Figures in bold are significantly different at α < 0.05.
Figure 6
Frequency of skin lesions. Bats were identified as either healthy (n = 52) or with homeostasis disrupted by P. destructans skin infection (n = 24) using PCA. The arrow shows the expected threshold in number of UV-fluorescing skin lesions (328.5) for manifestation of skin infection through disruption of blood parameters.
Summary statistics for general linear models of blood parameters, with wing-lesion score as a fixed factor and locality as a random factor.Figures in bold are significantly different at α < 0.05.Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test of locality and wing-lesion score impact on blood parameters.(a) Bat dispersion and (b) projection of variables in blood parameter space based on PCA. The position of bats with no UV-fluorescing skin lesions and highest principal component values (grey dot) was used to define the midpoint of new principal component axes. Black dots = diseased, open dots = healthy; supplementary factors are marked by a star. Abbreviations: BE = base excess, glu = glucose, lymf = lymphocytes, neu = neutrophils.Difference between healthy and diseased hibernating bats in groups defined by a) principal component analysis (PCA) and b) UV spot threshold (total UV-fluorescing skin lesion number = 328.5).Figures in bold are significantly different at α < 0.05.Frequency of skin lesions. Bats were identified as either healthy (n = 52) or with homeostasis disrupted by P. destructans skin infection (n = 24) using PCA. The arrow shows the expected threshold in number of UV-fluorescing skin lesions (328.5) for manifestation of skin infection through disruption of blood parameters.
Discussion
The continent-wide colonisation of Palearctic underground hibernacula and ongoing spread of the fungal pathogen in North America makes exposure of bats hibernating in the temperate zone of the northern hemisphere to P. destructans highly probable[11,16,17,20,21,55-58]. The wide distribution of both the host and its pathogen results in spatial and temporal variation in host-pathogen population interactions, allowing performance studies into host health and pathogen virulence under differing environmental conditions. Here we show that even early-stage fungal damage of bat wing membranes may negatively impact physiological status, dependent on infection intensity and hibernation conditions. Our data suggest that the pattern of disease impact can vary between sites.We chose European M. myotis as a model species to examine naturally occurring host-pathogen interactions with P. destructans as they have a higher survival capacity than the North American little brown bat (M. lucifugus) and big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus)[59]. Nevertheless, sporadic mortalities associated with P. destructans infection have been reported for M. myotis, documenting that infection intensity can range from mild to severe[18]. Recently, a model taking account of temperature, humidity-dependent fungal growth and bat energetics during hibernation was devised, which predicted that the likelihood of surviving P. destructans infection increases with increasing body size and drier and/or colder hibernation sites[59]. While M. myotis is one of the largest European bat species, highest infection intensity has been found in those hibernating at low hibernation body temperatures, contrary to our prediction. Three hypotheses may explain this paradox. First, bats select lower hibernation temperatures as an adaptation to conserve energy when dealing with high infection intensity. Second, bats selecting low hibernation temperatures develop increased infection intensities as a consequence of a reduced ability to up-regulate immune functions and clear the infection[24,60,61]. Third, under conditions of natural infection, P. destructans growth and virulence is stronger in those bats hibernating at low temperatures, despite laboratory studies suggesting a temperature optimum of between 12.5 and 15.8 °C[62]. Unfortunately, we lack data on hibernation temperature history, arousal frequency, infection dose and duration of infection for each bat, which would allow these hypotheses to be tested explicitly. In the present study, bats were only sampled once at the end of the hibernation period. Interestingly, skin lesion number differed between the left and right wings, suggesting differing exposure to infection and uneven spread of the fungal agent across the body surface during cleaning when aroused. A field experiment analysing fungal load dynamics in relation to wing membrane pathology and bat body temperature during hibernation is needed to provide greater insight into such host-pathogen interactions under natural conditions.
BMI loss in diseased bats indicative of disease tolerance
Our data provide further evidence for tolerance of Palearctic bat species to the P. destructans fungus[21]. The regression lines obtained by plotting host BMI against pathogen burden (skin fungal load) at each hibernaculum display a shallow BMI loss slope as infection intensity increases (Fig. 2). Owing to the differences in origin of the hibernacula used in this study, host-pathogen population interactions will have undergone different evolutionary histories, ranging from tens, to hundreds or even thousands of years. Cave-hibernating bats, with their distinctly lower BMI (Fig. 2), showed lowest tolerance capacity to infection. Transition to euthermia in the early post-hibernation period allows bats to mount an effective immune response against the fungal pathogen and clear any skin infection[19,63]. Later, the bat’s defence strategy turns from tolerance to resistance[42]. Very little is known about the health of P. destructans infected hosts in the period following emergence from hibernation. The dichotomy of disease outcome in euthermic bats results in either healing[63] or mortality due to immunopathology[64]. In M. myotis, healing may occur within two weeks, during which the diagnostic UV-fluorescence disappears and a scab develops over the previously infected skin[19]. The costs of neutrophilic inflammation and wing membrane tissue remodelling are hard to estimate. Likewise, we lack detailed quantification of physiological costs associated with flight performance and changes in foraging efficiency in bats recovering from P. destructans infection[63,65-67]. Upon arousal, early euthermic females may also face a trade-off between mounting an immune response and the energetic investment needed to initiate gestation[68,69]. Higher cortisol levels, indicative of chronic stress, have been recorded in bats surviving exposure to P. destructans, and this may have adverse effects on reproductive success[70]. Further, North American species recovering from P. destructans infection have shown shifts in pregnancy and lactation, suggestive of reproductive fitness consequences[71]. Similar studies on reproductive fitness consequences have yet to be performed on European bats facing fungal pathogen pressure.
Alterations in blood homeostasis in diseased bats
While infectious diseases are commonly thought to induce biochemical responses that differ between species[72], our data showed hibernation site-specific differences. Haematology and blood chemistry reflect body and tissue status. A range of mechanisms maintain blood parameters within a narrow range; blood pH, for example, being maintained through respiratory system and kidney function. Hibernation, on the other hand, represents a specific physiological state resulting in changes to metabolic and biochemical pathways[73]. Heart rate, cardiac output and respiration are greatly reduced during deep hibernation, and these changes lead to a drop in pH and marked acidosis.Studies of blood homeostasis in M. lucifugus indicate a pattern of changes dependent on WNS intensity[29,31,32,74]. While such studies have sampled blood by decapitation, we used non-lethal vessel puncturing to study M. myotis, a strictly protected European bat. Cryan et al.[31], using data on P. destructans infection in both captive and wild hibernating bats, noted that electrolyte depletion increased with increasing wing damage severity. Furthermore, measurements of urine-specific gravity suggested that bats underwent hypotonic dehydration. In a second study, captive hibernation of M. lucifugus following experimental inoculation with P. destructans complicated blood sampling, allowing analysis of only eight infected bats[32]. The addition of data from two follow-up captive inoculation experiments, however, showed no difference between the infected and control groups[68]. While data obtained by Warnecke et al.[32] were only suggestive of metabolic acidosis, Verant et al.[29] observed chronic respiratory acidosis with metabolic compensation in bats at an early stage of the disease.
A skin lesion threshold distinguishing healthy and diseased bats
As all bats in our study were naturally infected in their hibernacula and confirmed positive for P. destructans (with the exception of one individual from Nietoperek), it was not possible to compare host physiological responses to the fungus against a non-infected control group. Nevertheless, our non-diseased and diseased groups, as defined by PCA, differed in blood pH, tCO2, bicarbonate, base excess/deficit and anion gap. These acid-base parameters shifted to mild metabolic acidosis in the diseased group (Table 4). The diseased group displayed higher infection intensity, distinguished by both fungal load and UV-fluorescing skin lesions. Bats defined as diseased (i.e. with blood parameters showing homeostasis disruption) had a hibernating body surface temperature around 2 °C lower than non-diseased individuals. The diseased group also displayed significantly decreased glucose concentrations and BMI. Contrary to blood biochemistry results for M. lucifugus, we observed no differences in electrolytes between diseased and non-diseased M. myotis, suggesting that the acid-base disruption was due to increased energy utilisation associated with infection. The increase in differential neutrophil count was non-significant, probably because the white blood cells migrated from blood to the infected sites[19]. Interestingly, significant eosinophilia was observed in diseased M. myotis. Peripheral blood eosinophilia is commonly associated with chronic, parasitic and fungal infections[75]. As eosinophilia is also associated with hypersensitivity reactions, however, our findings may support the hypothesis that immunopathology plays a role in post-emergent WNS mortality[64].While exposure of bats to multiple natural and/or anthropogenic stressors is a realistic environmental scenario[76-79], sub-lethal adverse effects are mostly underreported. Disease pathogenesis and the action of multiple stressors during hibernation are not yet fully understood; however, different stressors may well combine to exert synergistic effects[80]. Importantly, disturbance by human activities, such as tourism, caving or research, could also threaten hibernating bats by increasing energy expenditure[81].
Conclusion
Following the emergence of WNS and recognition of its impact on North American bat populations in 2006, chiropterologists concerned with European bat conservation have asked one essential question: are Palearctic bat populations and communities threatened by this fungal disease? Up to now, there have been no functional studies addressing host-pathogen interactions in relation to WNS. However, there is mounting evidence for virulent skin invasion and pathognomonic lesions in many hibernating Eurasian bat species. As these findings have not been associated with mass mortalities and/or population declines, research should be directed toward examining health consequences in terms of trade-off mechanisms modulating investment into host response to infection.In this study, we were able to show variation in fungal pathogen pressure in relation to hibernaculum-dependent physiological effects of P. destructans infection. We conclude that European M. myotis survive P. destructans invasion, despite showing deterioration in health, with infection intensity dependent on hibernation conditions. Disruption in blood homeostasis was observed in bats, even with a low threshold number of skin lesions on both wings. We argue that overwintering in underground hibernacula colonised by this virulent pathogen is associated with health-related costs for European bats. Further research should aim to quantify levels of homeostasis disruption in terms of constrained energy reserves and compatibility for survival.Supplementary Table S1
Authors: Gregory G Turner; Carol Uphoff Meteyer; Hazel Barton; John F Gumbs; DeeAnn M Reeder; Barrie Overton; Hana Bandouchova; Tomáš Bartonička; Natália Martínková; Jiri Pikula; Jan Zukal; David S Blehert Journal: J Wildl Dis Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 1.535
Authors: Lisa Warnecke; James M Turner; Trent K Bollinger; Vikram Misra; Paul M Cryan; David S Blehert; Gudrun Wibbelt; Craig K R Willis Journal: Biol Lett Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 3.703
Authors: David T S Hayman; Juliet R C Pulliam; Jonathan C Marshall; Paul M Cryan; Colleen T Webb Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Joseph R Hoyt; Keping Sun; Katy L Parise; Guanjun Lu; Kate E Langwig; Tinglei Jiang; Shubao Yang; Winifred F Frick; A Marm Kilpatrick; Jeffrey T Foster; Jiang Feng Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Jeffrey M Lorch; Jonathan M Palmer; Daniel L Lindner; Anne E Ballmann; Kyle G George; Kathryn Griffin; Susan Knowles; John R Huckabee; Katherine H Haman; Christopher D Anderson; Penny A Becker; Joseph B Buchanan; Jeffrey T Foster; David S Blehert Journal: mSphere Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 4.389
Authors: Petr Linhart; Hana Bandouchova; Jan Zukal; Jan Votýpka; Vojtech Baláž; Tomas Heger; Vendula Kalocsanyiova; Aneta Kubickova; Monika Nemcova; Jana Sedlackova; Veronika Seidlova; Lucie Veitova; Anton Vlaschenko; Renata Divinova; Jiri Pikula Journal: Microorganisms Date: 2022-05-14
Authors: Veronika Kovacova; Jan Zukal; Hana Bandouchova; Alexander D Botvinkin; Markéta Harazim; Natália Martínková; Oleg L Orlov; Vladimir Piacek; Alexandra P Shumkina; Mikhail P Tiunov; Jiri Pikula Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Jiri Pikula; Tomas Heger; Hana Bandouchova; Veronika Kovacova; Monika Nemcova; Ivana Papezikova; Vladimir Piacek; Renata Zajíčková; Jan Zukal Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Christina M Davy; Michael E Donaldson; Hana Bandouchova; Ana M Breit; Nicole A S Dorville; Yvonne A Dzal; Veronika Kovacova; Emma L Kunkel; Natália Martínková; Kaleigh J O Norquay; James E Paterson; Jan Zukal; Jiri Pikula; Craig K R Willis; Christopher J Kyle Journal: Virulence Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 5.882
Authors: Veronika Seidlova; Jan Zukal; Jiri Brichta; Nikolay Anisimov; Grzegorz Apoznański; Hana Bandouchova; Tomáš Bartonička; Hana Berková; Alexander D Botvinkin; Tomas Heger; Heliana Dundarova; Tomasz Kokurewicz; Petr Linhart; Oleg L Orlov; Vladimir Piacek; Primož Presetnik; Alexandra P Shumkina; Mikhail P Tiunov; Frantisek Treml; Jiri Pikula Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2020-12-10 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Thomas M Lilley; Jenni M Prokkola; Anna S Blomberg; Steve Paterson; Joseph S Johnson; Gregory G Turner; Tomáš Bartonička; Erik Bachorec; DeeAnn M Reeder; Kenneth A Field Journal: Oecologia Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Catherine G Haase; Nathan W Fuller; C Reed Hranac; David T S Hayman; Liam P McGuire; Kaleigh J O Norquay; Kirk A Silas; Craig K R Willis; Raina K Plowright; Sarah H Olson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 3.240