Literature DB >> 28592663

Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates.

Diana D Chin1, Laura Y Matloff1, Amanda Kay Stowers2, Emily R Tucci1, David Lentink1.   

Abstract

Harnessing flight strategies refined by millions of years of evolution can help expedite the design of more efficient, manoeuvrable and robust flying robots. This review synthesizes recent advances and highlights remaining gaps in our understanding of how bird and bat wing adaptations enable effective flight. Included in this discussion is an evaluation of how current robotic analogues measure up to their biological sources of inspiration. Studies of vertebrate wings have revealed skeletal systems well suited for enduring the loads required during flight, but the mechanisms that drive coordinated motions between bones and connected integuments remain ill-described. Similarly, vertebrate flight muscles have adapted to sustain increased wing loading, but a lack of in vivo studies limits our understanding of specific muscular functions. Forelimb adaptations diverge at the integument level, but both bird feathers and bat membranes yield aerodynamic surfaces with a level of robustness unparalleled by engineered wings. These morphological adaptations enable a diverse range of kinematics tuned for different flight speeds and manoeuvres. By integrating vertebrate flight specializations-particularly those that enable greater robustness and adaptability-into the design and control of robotic wings, engineers can begin narrowing the wide margin that currently exists between flying robots and vertebrates. In turn, these robotic wings can help biologists create experiments that would be impossible in vivo.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Keywords:  flight; forelimb specialization; wing design

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28592663      PMCID: PMC5493806          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  111 in total

Review 1.  How animals move: an integrative view.

Authors:  M H Dickinson; C T Farley; R J Full; M A Koehl; R Kram; S Lehman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking, slow jogging, and running.

Authors:  T S Keller; A M Weisberger; J L Ray; S S Hasan; R G Shiavi; D M Spengler
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Structure, form, and function of flight in engineering and the living world.

Authors:  Ulla M Lindhe Norberg
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.804

4.  Animal flight dynamics I. Stability in gliding flight.

Authors:  A L Thomas; G K Taylor
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-10-07       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Animal flight dynamics II. Longitudinal stability in flapping flight.

Authors:  G K Taylor; A L R Thomas
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Scaling bat wingbeat frequency and amplitude.

Authors:  R D Bullen; N L McKenzie
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Kinematics of flap-bounding flight in the zebra finch over a wide range of speeds

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Flexibility in flight behaviour of barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) and house martins (Delichon urbica) tested in a wind tunnel.

Authors:  L Bruderer; F Liechti; D Bilo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 9.  The ecological and evolutionary interface of hummingbird flight physiology.

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Robert Dudley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Estimates of circulation and gait change based on a three-dimensional kinematic analysis of flight in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) and ringed turtle-doves (Streptopelia risoria).

Authors:  Tyson L Hedrick; Bret W Tobalske; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  2 in total

1.  Range of motion in the avian wing is strongly associated with flight behavior and body mass.

Authors:  V B Baliga; I Szabo; D L Altshuler
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 14.136

2.  Phase transformation-driven artificial muscle mimics the multifunctionality of avian wing muscle.

Authors:  Pedro B C Leal; Marcela Cabral-Seanez; Vikram B Baliga; Douglas L Altshuler; Darren J Hartl
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 4.118

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.