Literature DB >> 23345944

Characterization of focal liver masses using acoustic radiation force impulse elastography.

Hana Park1, Jun Yong Park, Do Young Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Chae Yoon Chon, Kwang-Hyub Han, Seung Up Kim.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic performance of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography for characterizing focal liver mass by quantifying their stiffness.
METHODS: This prospective study included 62 patients with a focal liver mass that was well visualized on conventional ultrasonography performed in our institution from February 2011 to November 2011. Among them, 12 patients were excluded for ARFI measurement failure due to a lesion that was smaller than the region of the interest and at an inaccessible location (deeper than 8 cm) (n = 7) or poor compliance to hold their breath as required (n = 5). Finally, 50 patients with valid ARFI measurements were enrolled. If a patient had multiple liver masses, only one mass of interest was chosen. The masses were diagnosed by histological examination or clinical diagnostic criteria. During ultrasonographic evaluation, stiffness, expressed as velocity, was checked 10 times per focal liver mass and the surrounding liver parenchyma.
RESULTS: After further excluding three masses that were non-diagnostic on biopsy, a total of 47 focal mass lesions were tested, including 39 (83.0%) malignant masses [24 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC), seven cholangiocellular carcinomas (CCC), and eight liver metastases] and eight (17.0%) benign masses (five hemangiomas and three focal nodular hyperplasias, FNH). Thirty-seven (74.0%) masses were confirmed by histological examination. The mean velocity was 2.48 m/s in HCCs, 1.65 m/s in CCCs, 2.35 m/s in metastases, 1.83 m/s in hemangiomas, and 0.97 m/s in FNHs. Although considerable overlap was still noted between malignant and benign masses, significant differences in ARFI values were observed between malignant and benign masses (mean 2.31 m/s vs 1.51 m/s, P = 0.047), as well as between HCCs and benign masses (mean 2.48 m/s vs 1.51 m/s, P = 0.006). The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROC) for discriminating the malignant masses from benign masses was 0.724 (95%CI, 0.566-0.883, P = 0.048), and the AUROC for discriminating HCCs from benign masses was 0.813 (95%CI, 0.649-0.976, P = 0.008). To maximize the sum of sensitivity and specificity, an ARFI value of 1.82 m/s was selected as the cutoff value to differentiate malignant from benign liver masses. Furthermore, the cutoff value for distinguishing HCCs from benign masses was also determined to be 1.82 m/s. The diagnostic performance of the sum of the ARFI values for focal liver masses and the surrounding liver parenchyma to differentiate liver masses improved (AUROC = 0.853; 95%CI, 0.745-0.960; P = 0.002 in malignant liver masses vs benign ones and AUROC = 0.948; 95%CI, 0.896-0.992, P < 0.001 in HCCs vs benign masses).
CONCLUSION: ARFI elastography provides additional information for the differential diagnosis of liver masses. However, our results should be interpreted in clinical context, because considerable overlap in ARFI values existed among liver masses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic radiation force impulse; Cholangiocellular carcinoma; Focal liver mass; Focal nodular hyperplasia; Hemangioma; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver metastasis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23345944      PMCID: PMC3547567          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i2.219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  32 in total

1.  Characterization of focal liver lesions (FLL) with acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastometry.

Authors:  R Heide; D Strobel; T Bernatik; R S Goertz
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 6.548

2.  Accuracy of VirtualTouch Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) imaging for the diagnosis of cirrhosis during liver ultrasonography.

Authors:  F Piscaglia; V Salvatore; R Di Donato; M D'Onofrio; S Gualandi; A Gallotti; E Peri; A Borghi; F Conti; G Fattovich; E Sagrini; A Cucchetti; P Andreone; L Bolondi
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 6.548

3.  The usefulness of liver stiffness measurement using FibroScan in chronic hepatitis C in South Korea: a multicenter, prospective study.

Authors:  Seung Up Kim; Hui Won Jang; Jae Youn Cheong; Ja Kyung Kim; Myung Hee Lee; Dong Joon Kim; Jin Mo Yang; Sung Won Cho; Kwan Sik Lee; Eun Hee Choi; Young Nyun Park; Kwang-Hyub Han
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.029

4.  Usefulness of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant liver lesions.

Authors:  Tian Shuang-Ming; Zhou Ping; Qian Ying; Chen Li-Rong; Zhang Ping; Li Rui-Zhen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI)--a new modality for the evaluation of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Ioan Sporea; Roxana Sirli; Alina Popescu; Mirela Danilă
Journal:  Med Ultrason       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.611

6.  Comparing acoustic radiation force impulse imaging to transient elastography to assess liver stiffness in healthy volunteers with and without valsalva manoeuvre.

Authors:  S Horster; P Mandel; R Zachoval; D A Clevert
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Noninvasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis using acoustic radiation force-based shear stiffness in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Michael H Wang; Ned C Rouze; Manal F Abdelmalek; Cynthia D Guy; Barry Moser; Anna Mae Diehl; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 25.083

8.  Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in distinguishing hepatic haemangiomata from metastases: preliminary observations.

Authors:  G Davies; M Koenen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for hepatocellular carcinoma-associated radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Hee-Jin Kwon; Myong-Jin Kang; Jin-Han Cho; Jong-Young Oh; Kyung-Jin Nam; Sang-Yeong Han; Sung Wook Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Advancement in HCC imaging: diagnosis, staging and treatment efficacy assessments: hepatocellular carcinoma: imaging in assessing treatment efficacy.

Authors:  Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 7.027

View more
  19 in total

1.  Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in differentiating renal solid masses: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Le-Hang Guo; Bo-Ji Liu; Hui-Xiong Xu; Chang Liu; Li-Ping Sun; Yi-Feng Zhang; Jun-Mei Xu; Jian Wu; Xiao-Hong Xu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-10-15

Review 2.  Ultrasound elastographic techniques in focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Clara Benedetta Conti; Federica Cavalcoli; Mirella Fraquelli; Dario Conte; Sara Massironi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Light and sound - emerging imaging techniques for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Ferdinand Knieling; Maximilian J Waldner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Analyzing the Impact of Increasing Mechanical Index and Energy Deposition on Shear Wave Speed Reconstruction in Human Liver.

Authors:  Yufeng Deng; Mark L Palmeri; Ned C Rouze; Stephen J Rosenzweig; Manal F Abdelmalek; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 5.  Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Laurent Castéra; Cheng William Hong; Curtis L Johnson; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Characterization of fortuitously discovered focal liver lesions: additional information provided by shearwave elastography.

Authors:  Maxime Ronot; Sara Di Renzo; Bettina Gregoli; Rafael Duran; Laurent Castera; Bernard E Van Beers; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Differentiation of benign and malignant focal liver lesions: value of virtual touch tissue quantification of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography.

Authors:  Le-Hang Guo; Shu-Jun Wang; Hui-Xiong Xu; Li-Ping Sun; Yi-Feng Zhang; Jun-Mei Xu; Jian Wu; Hui-Jun Fu; Xiao-Hong Xu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  Conditionally Increased Acoustic Pressures in Nonfetal Diagnostic Ultrasound Examinations Without Contrast Agents: A Preliminary Assessment.

Authors:  Kathryn R Nightingale; Charles C Church; Gerald Harris; Keith A Wear; Michael R Bailey; Paul L Carson; Hui Jiang; Kurt L Sandstrom; Thomas L Szabo; Marvin C Ziskin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 9.  Non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Leonardo de Lucca Schiavon; Janaína Luz Narciso-Schiavon; Roberto José de Carvalho-Filho
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Primary biliary cirrhosis degree assessment by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging and hepatic fibrosis indicators.

Authors:  Hai-Chun Zhang; Rong-Fei Hu; Ting Zhu; Ling Tong; Qiu-Qin Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.