Literature DB >> 21419668

Usefulness of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant liver lesions.

Tian Shuang-Ming1, Zhou Ping, Qian Ying, Chen Li-Rong, Zhang Ping, Li Rui-Zhen.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) is a newly developed technique for the evaluation of tissue stiffness. It has been applied to evaluate liver fibrosis, but only limited data for liver lesions are available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tissue stiffness of liver lesions by using ARFI to differentiate benign from malignant liver lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: ARFI was performed in 116 consecutive patients who had 128 liver lesions (60 benign, 68 malignant). The elastographic images of virtual touch tissue imaging (VTI) and the values of virtual touch tissue quantification (VTQ) were obtained and analyzed. The area under the curve and cutoff value for VTQ value, both of which were obtained by using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, were used to assess diagnostic performance.
RESULTS: On the elastographic images of VTI, 57 (83.8%) malignant liver lesions and 33 (55.0%) benign liver lesions appeared stiffer compared with the surrounding liver parenchyma. There were statistical differences between malignant and benign liver lesions (P < .05). The VTQ median value of malignant and benign liver lesions were 3.14 m/sec (average value 3.16 ± 0.80 m/sec, range 1.17‒4.45 m/sec) and 1.35 m/sec (average value 1.47 ± 0.53 m/sec, range 0.74‒3.26 m/sec), respectively (P < .001). With a cutoff value of 2.22 m/sec for VTQ value, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for malignancy were 89.7%, 95.0%, and 92.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: ARFI can provide the elastographic images and elastographic values of liver lesions by VTI and VTQ, which is helpful in the differentiation between benign and malignant liver lesions and might become the imaging modality of the future.
Copyright © 2011 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21419668     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  18 in total

1.  Clinical utility of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for identification of malignant liver lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Ying; Xiao Lin; Zuo-Liu Xie; Fei-Yun Tang; Yuan-Ping Hu; Ke-Qing Shi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Liver elastography, comments on EFSUMB elastography guidelines 2013.

Authors:  Xin-Wu Cui; Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Chiara De Molo; Andre Ignee; Dagmar Schreiber-Dietrich; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: liver.

Authors:  Masatoshi Kudo; Tsuyoshi Shiina; Fuminori Moriyasu; Hiroko Iijima; Ryosuke Tateishi; Norihisa Yada; Kenji Fujimoto; Hiroyasu Morikawa; Masashi Hirooka; Yasukiyo Sumino; Takashi Kumada
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 4.  Acoustic radiation force elasticity imaging in diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  Joshua R Doherty; Gregg E Trahey; Kathryn R Nightingale; Mark L Palmeri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  [Elastography as an additional tool in breast sonography. Technical principles and clinical applications].

Authors:  D Rjosk-Dendorfer; A Reichelt; D-A Clevert
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Laurent Castéra; Cheng William Hong; Curtis L Johnson; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant liver lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuelei Ma; Wenli Zhan; Binglan Zhang; Benling Wei; Xin Wu; Min Zhou; Lei Liu; Ping Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-01-05

8.  Discrepancies in reporting tissue material properties.

Authors:  Matthew W Urban; Ivan Z Nenadic; Shigao Chen; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Differentiation of benign and malignant focal liver lesions: value of virtual touch tissue quantification of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography.

Authors:  Le-Hang Guo; Shu-Jun Wang; Hui-Xiong Xu; Li-Ping Sun; Yi-Feng Zhang; Jun-Mei Xu; Jian Wu; Hui-Jun Fu; Xiao-Hong Xu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Characterization of focal liver masses using acoustic radiation force impulse elastography.

Authors:  Hana Park; Jun Yong Park; Do Young Kim; Sang Hoon Ahn; Chae Yoon Chon; Kwang-Hyub Han; Seung Up Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.