Literature DB >> 25550782

Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in differentiating renal solid masses: a preliminary experience.

Le-Hang Guo1, Bo-Ji Liu1, Hui-Xiong Xu1, Chang Liu1, Li-Ping Sun1, Yi-Feng Zhang1, Jun-Mei Xu1, Jian Wu1, Xiao-Hong Xu2.   

Abstract

New diagnostic methods are required to diagnose renal mass. Thus, we assessed virtual tissue quantification (VTQ) of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography in differentiation of renal solid masses. Forty-two patients with renal masses were assessed by VTQ in terms of measurement of the shear wave velocity (SWV). The masses were divided into three groups. They were clear cell carcinoma (CCC) angiomyolipoma (AML), and pseudotumor. The differences among the three groups in SWV, as well as between masses and its surrounding parenchyma, were investigated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the diagnostic performance. We found that the SWV among the three groups were significant different (F = 6.976, P = 0.003) and the SWV of pseudotumor (3.14 ± 0.75 m/s) was significantly higher than CCC (2.46 ± 0.45 m/s) and AML (2.49 ± 0.63 m/s) (P = 0.007 and 0.001 respectively). There were no significant difference between CCC and AML in SWV (P = 0.719). For each group, there was no significant difference between the mass and its surrounding parenchyma (P = 0.693, 0.892, and 0.714, respectively). Between pseudotumor and CCC, the optimal cut-off value of SWV for differential diagnoses was 3.07 m/s; and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.560 to 0.924) (P = 0.004), the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 58.3%, respectively. Between pseudotumor and AML, the optimal cut-off value of SWV for differential diagnoses was 3.03 m/s, thus AUC curve was 0.786 (95% CI: 0.591 to 0.918) (P = 0.002), the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 58.3%, respectively. No significant difference was found between AML and CCC (P = 0.587) and the AUC was 0.562. To conclude, our results support that ARFI has potential value in differentiation between CCC and pseudotumor, or between AML and pseudotumor, however, it fails to make a distinction between CCC and AML.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography; renal solid mass; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25550782      PMCID: PMC4270564     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol        ISSN: 1936-2625


  27 in total

Review 1.  Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M Jayson; H Sanders
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Renal tumour size measured radiologically before surgery is an unreliable variable for predicting histopathological features: benign tumours are not necessarily small.

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Daniela Katzenbeisser; Matthias Waldert; Hans-Christoph Klingler; Martin Susani; Mazda Memarsadeghi; Gertraud Heinz-Peer; Andrea Haitel; Ralf Herwig; Michael Marberger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy.

Authors:  Stuart G Silverman; Yu Unn Gan; Koenraad J Mortele; Kemal Tuncali; Edmund S Cibas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Small renal cell carcinoma: pathologic and radiologic correlation.

Authors:  Y Yamashita; M Takahashi; O Watanabe; S Yoshimatsu; S Ueno; S Ishimaru; M Kan; S Takano; N Ninomiya
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) ultrasound imaging of pancreatic cystic lesions.

Authors:  M D'Onofrio; A Gallotti; R Salvia; P Capelli; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Real-time elastography for distinguishing angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma: preliminary observations.

Authors:  Sinan Tan; Muhammed Fuat Özcan; Fatih Tezcan; Serdar Balci; Mustafa Karaoğlanoğlu; Bülent Huddam; Halil Arslan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Renal cell carcinoma: real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings.

Authors:  Zuo-Feng Xu; Hui-Xiong Xu; Xiao-Yan Xie; Guang-Jian Liu; Yan-Ling Zheng; Jin-Yu Liang; Ming-De Lu
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2010-12

Review 8.  Management of the incidentally detected solid renal mass.

Authors:  A C Novick
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.299

Review 9.  Renal tumor biopsies for evaluation of small renal tumors: why, in whom, and how?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Michael Marberger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Renal ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  N Grenier; J-L Gennisson; F Cornelis; Y Le Bras; L Couzi
Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 4.026

View more
  5 in total

1.  The diagnosis value of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography for thyroid malignancy without highly suspicious features on conventional ultrasound.

Authors:  Bo-Ji Liu; Feng Lu; Hui-Xiong Xu; Le-Hang Guo; Dan-Dan Li; Xiao-Wan Bo; Xiao-Long Li; Yi-Feng Zhang; Jun-Mei Xu; Xiao-Hong Xu; Shen Qu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 2.  Expanding the Role of Ultrasound for the Characterization of Renal Masses.

Authors:  Eduard Roussel; Riccardo Campi; Daniele Amparore; Riccardo Bertolo; Umberto Carbonara; Selcuk Erdem; Alexandre Ingels; Önder Kara; Laura Marandino; Michele Marchioni; Stijn Muselaers; Nicola Pavan; Angela Pecoraro; Benoit Beuselinck; Ivan Pedrosa; David Fetzer; Maarten Albersen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 3.  Elastography in the Urological Practice: Urinary and Male Genital Tract, Prostate Excluded-Review.

Authors:  Vasile Simon; Sorin Marian Dudea; Nicolae Crisan; Vasile Dan Stanca; Marina Dudea-Simon; Iulia Andras; Zoltan Attila Mihaly; Ioan Coman
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-16

Review 4.  Ultrasound Elastography: Review of Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Rosa M S Sigrist; Joy Liau; Ahmed El Kaffas; Maria Cristina Chammas; Juergen K Willmann
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 11.556

5.  Can acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) accurately diagnose renal masses?: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiang-Feng Wu; Li-Jing Ge; Xiao-Bo Ye; Yue Sun; Yun-Lai Wang; Zheng-Ping Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.