Literature DB >> 23344517

Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose chest CT: comparison of pulmonary nodule detectability with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.

Masaki Katsura1, Izuru Matsuda, Masaaki Akahane, Koichiro Yasaka, Shohei Hanaoka, Hiroyuki Akai, Jiro Sato, Akira Kunimatsu, Kuni Ohtomo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) enables dose reduction over adaptive iterative reconstruction (ASIR) while maintaining diagnostic performance.
METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study, 59 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.7 [13.4] years) gave informed consent to undergo reference-, low-, and ultralow-dose chest computed tomography (CT) with 64-row multidetector CT. The reference- and low-dose CT involved the use of automatic tube current modulation with fixed noise indices (31.5 and 70.44 at 0.625 mm, respectively) and were reconstructed with 50% ASIR-filtered back projection blending. The ultralow-dose CT was acquired with a fixed tube current-time product of 5 mA s and reconstructed with MBIR. Two radiologists evaluated 2.5- and 0.625-mm-slice-thick axial images from low-dose ASIR and ultralow-dose MBIR, recorded the pattern of each nodule candidate, and assigned each a confidence score. A reference standard was established by a consensus panel of 2 different radiologists, who identified 84 noncalcified nodules with diameters of 4 mm or greater on reference-dose ASIR (ground-glass opacity, n = 18; partly solid, n = 11; solid, n = 55). Sensitivity in nodule detection was assessed using the McNemar test. Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis was applied to assess the results including confidence scores.
RESULTS: Compared with the low-dose CT, a 78.1% decrease in dose-length product was seen with the ultralow-dose CT. No significant differences were observed between the low-dose ASIR and the ultralow-dose MBIR for overall nodule detection in sensitivity (P = 0.48-0.69) or the JAFROC analysis (P = 0.57). Likewise, no significant differences were seen for ground-glass opacity, partly solid, or solid nodule detection in sensitivity (P = 0.08-0.65) or the JAFROC analysis (P = 0.21-0.90).
CONCLUSIONS: Model-based iterative reconstruction enables nearly an 80% reduction in radiation dose for chest CT from a low-dose level to an ultralow-dose level, without affecting nodule detectability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23344517     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31827efc3a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  49 in total

1.  Impact of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction on pulmonary nodule measurements at chest CT: a phantom study.

Authors:  Hyungjin Kim; Chang Min Park; Hee Dong Chae; Sang Min Lee; Jin Mo Goo
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Computer-assisted solid lung nodule 3D volumetry on CT: influence of scan mode and iterative reconstruction: a CT phantom study.

Authors:  Adriaan Coenen; Osamu Honda; Eric J van der Jagt; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Impact of iterative reconstruction on CT coronary calcium quantification.

Authors:  Akira Kurata; Anoeshka Dharampal; Admir Dedic; Pim J de Feyter; Gabriel P Krestin; Marcel L Dijkshoorn; Koen Nieman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Combining automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection and iterative reconstruction: a liver phantom study.

Authors:  Daniela B Husarik; Sebastian T Schindera; Fabian Morsbach; Natalie Chuck; Burkhardt Seifert; Zsolt Szucs-Farkas; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Ultra-low-dose CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): detection of ground-glass nodules in an anthropomorphic phantom study.

Authors:  Cristiano Rampinelli; Daniela Origgi; Vittoria Vecchi; Luigi Funicelli; Sara Raimondi; Paul Deak; Massimo Bellomi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Lung cancer screening with ultra-low dose CT using full iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Masayo Fujita; Toru Higaki; Yoshikazu Awaya; Toshio Nakanishi; Yuko Nakamura; Fuminari Tatsugami; Yasutaka Baba; Makoto Iida; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 7.  Efficacy of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: the current state of evidence of mortality reduction.

Authors:  Motoyasu Sagawa; Takafumi Sugawara; Naoya Ishibashi; Akira Koyanagi; Takashi Kondo; Toshiharu Tabata
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Evaluation of Abdominal Computed Tomography Image Quality Using a New Version of Vendor-Specific Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction.

Authors:  Corey T Jensen; Morgan E Telesmanich; Nicolaus A Wagner-Bartak; Xinming Liu; John Rong; Janio Szklaruk; Aliya Qayyum; Wei Wei; Adam G Chandler; Eric P Tamm
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Single-energy metal artifact reduction technique for reducing metallic coil artifacts on post-interventional cerebral CT and CT angiography.

Authors:  Masaki Katsura; Jiro Sato; Masaaki Akahane; Taku Tajima; Toshihiro Furuta; Harushi Mori; Osamu Abe
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Comparison of chest radiography, chest digital tomosynthesis and low dose MDCT to detect small ground-glass opacity nodules: an anthropomorphic chest phantom study.

Authors:  Kyung Won Doo; Eun-Young Kang; Hwan Seok Yong; Soo-Youn Ham; Ki Yeol Lee; Ji Yung Choo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.