OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the influence of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) on the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score by computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Seventy patients underwentCAC imaging by 128-slice dual-source CT. CAC volume, mass and Agatston score were calculated from images reconstructed by filtered back projection (FBP) without and with incremental degrees of the SAFIRE algorithm (10-50 %). We used the repeated measuring test and the Steel-Dwass test for multiple comparisons of values and the difference ratio among different SAFIRE groups using the FBP as reference. RESULTS: The median Agatston score (range) decreased with incremental SAFIRE degrees: 163 (0.1 - 3,393.3), 158.4 (0.3 - 3,079.3), 137.7 (0.1 - 2,978.0), 120.6 (0 - 2,783.6), 102.6 (0 - 2,468.4) and 84.1 (0 - 2,186.9) for 0 % (FBP), 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 % and 50 % SAFIRE, respectively (P < 0.05). In comparison with FBP, CAC volume (from 8.1 % to 47.7 %), CAC mass (from 5.3 % to 44.7 %) and CAC Agatston score (from 7.3 % to 48.4 %) all decreased with increasing SAFIRE from 10 % to 50 %, respectively (P < 0.05). High-grade SAFIRE resulted in the disappearance of detectable calcium in three cases with low calcium burden. CONCLUSION: SAFIRE noise reduction techniques significantly affected the CAC, which potentially alters perceived cardiovascular risk.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the influence of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) on the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score by computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients underwent CAC imaging by 128-slice dual-source CT. CAC volume, mass and Agatston score were calculated from images reconstructed by filtered back projection (FBP) without and with incremental degrees of the SAFIRE algorithm (10-50 %). We used the repeated measuring test and the Steel-Dwass test for multiple comparisons of values and the difference ratio among different SAFIRE groups using the FBP as reference. RESULTS: The median Agatston score (range) decreased with incremental SAFIRE degrees: 163 (0.1 - 3,393.3), 158.4 (0.3 - 3,079.3), 137.7 (0.1 - 2,978.0), 120.6 (0 - 2,783.6), 102.6 (0 - 2,468.4) and 84.1 (0 - 2,186.9) for 0 % (FBP), 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 % and 50 % SAFIRE, respectively (P < 0.05). In comparison with FBP, CAC volume (from 8.1 % to 47.7 %), CAC mass (from 5.3 % to 44.7 %) and CAC Agatston score (from 7.3 % to 48.4 %) all decreased with increasing SAFIRE from 10 % to 50 %, respectively (P < 0.05). High-grade SAFIRE resulted in the disappearance of detectable calcium in three cases with low calcium burden. CONCLUSION: SAFIRE noise reduction techniques significantly affected the CAC, which potentially alters perceived cardiovascular risk.
Authors: Stephan Baumueller; Anna Winklehner; Christoph Karlo; Robert Goetti; Thomas Flohr; Erich W Russi; Thomas Frauenfelder; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Matthijs Oudkerk; Arthur E Stillman; Sandra S Halliburton; Willi A Kalender; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Cynthia H McCollough; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Leslee J Shaw; William Stanford; Allen J Taylor; Peter M A van Ooijen; Lewis Wexler; Paolo Raggi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ryo Nakazato; Damini Dey; Ariel Gutstein; Ludovic Le Meunier; Victor Y Cheng; Raymond Pimentel; William Paz; Sean W Hayes; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2009-10-13
Authors: Allen J Taylor; Jody Bindeman; Irwin Feuerstein; Felix Cao; Michael Brazaitis; Patrick G O'Malley Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-09-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Admir Dedic; A Rossi; G J R Ten Kate; L A Neefjes; T W Galema; A Moelker; R T van Domburg; C J Schultz; N R Mollet; P J de Feyter; K Nieman Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2011-09-09 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Matthew J Budoff; Leslee J Shaw; Sandy T Liu; Steven R Weinstein; Tristen P Mosler; Philip H Tseng; Ferdinand R Flores; Tracy Q Callister; Paolo Raggi; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-04-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Robert Detrano; Alan D Guerci; J Jeffrey Carr; Diane E Bild; Gregory Burke; Aaron R Folsom; Kiang Liu; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; David A Bluemke; Daniel H O'Leary; Russell Tracy; Karol Watson; Nathan D Wong; Richard A Kronmal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bálint Szilveszter; Hesham Elzomor; Mihály Károlyi; Márton Kolossváry; Rolf Raaijmakers; Kálmán Benke; Csilla Celeng; Andrea Bartykowszki; Zsolt Bagyura; Árpád Lux; Béla Merkely; Pál Maurovich-Horvat Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Jochen A C van Osch; Mohamed Mouden; Jorn A van Dalen; Jorik R Timmer; Stoffer Reiffers; Siert Knollema; Marcel J W Greuter; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Piet L Jager Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Annemarie M den Harder; Martin J Willemink; Ronald L A W Bleys; Pim A de Jong; Ricardo P J Budde; Arnold M R Schilham; Tim Leiner Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-05-03 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Andrew D Choi; Eric S Leifer; Jeannie Yu; Sujata M Shanbhag; Kathie Bronson; Andrew E Arai; Marcus Y Chen Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2016-07-27