Literature DB >> 23343822

Optical coherence tomography-guided facedown positioning for macular hole surgery.

Sumit P Shah1, Varsha Manjunath, Adam H Rogers, Caroline R Baumal, Elias Reichel, Jay S Duker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To use spectral domain optical coherence tomography-guided duration of facedown positioning to study anatomical macular hole closure rates.
METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with macular holes undergoing 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy and intraocular gas tamponade. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging was done on postoperative Day 1. Patients remained facedown for 2 more days if the macular hole was closed or 6 more days facedown if the macular hole was open or indeterminate.
RESULTS: There were 8 Stage 2, 12 Stage 3, and 12 Stage 4 macular holes. On postoperative Day 1, 24 holes were closed by spectral domain optical coherence tomography and instructed to remain facedown for two more days. Twenty-three of 24 holes remained closed during the postoperative period. Eight holes were open or indeterminate on postoperative Day 1 and remained facedown for 6 more days. Six of 8 holes (75%) were closed at their last follow-up. The overall closure rate was 29/32 (90.6%). Average follow-up was 334 days.
CONCLUSION: Confirming early closure of macular holes with spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging can serve as an important guide to significantly shorten the duration of prone positioning while maintaining high closure rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23343822      PMCID: PMC3758113          DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318263d0e8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  30 in total

1.  Shortening the duration of prone positioning after macular hole surgery- comparison between 1-week and 1-day prone positioning.

Authors:  Takako Isomae; Yukihiro Sato; Hiroyuki Shimada
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Duration of face-down positioning after macular hole surgery: a comparison between 1 week and 3 days.

Authors:  Jørgen Krohn
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2005-06

3.  Macular hole surgery without face-down positioning. A pilot study.

Authors:  P E Tornambe; L S Poliner; K Grote
Journal:  Retina       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Outcomes of macular hole surgery and shortened face down positioning.

Authors:  Jason C Wickens; Gaurav K Shah
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Macular hole surgery with internal-limiting membrane peeling and intravitreous air.

Authors:  D W Park; J O Sipperley; S R Sneed; P U Dugel; J Jacobsen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Outcomes of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) versus perfluoroethane (C2F6) gas tamponade for non-posturing macular-hole surgery.

Authors:  Rubina Rahman; Indira Madgula; Kamron Khan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  A placebo-controlled trial of microplasmin intravitreous injection to facilitate posterior vitreous detachment before vitrectomy.

Authors:  Matthew S Benz; Kirk H Packo; Victor Gonzalez; Stephen Pakola; Donna Bezner; Julia A Haller; Steven D Schwartz
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Vitreous surgery for macular holes.

Authors:  R T Wendel; A C Patel; N E Kelly; T C Salzano; J W Wells; G D Novack
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Phaco-vitrectomy for full-thickness macular holes.

Authors:  P R Simcock; S Scalia
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2000-12

10.  Long-term outcomes of macular hole surgery with triamcinolone acetonide-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Kumagai; Mariko Furukawa; Nobuchika Ogino; Eric Larson; Akinori Uemura
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.256

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cone implicit time as a predictor of visual outcome in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Sten Andréasson; Fredrik Ghosh
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Predictive Model for Macular Hole Closure Speed: Insights From Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Justis P Ehlers; Atsuro Uchida; Sunil K Srivastava; Ming Hu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Usability of a gravity- and tilt-compensated sensor with data logging function to measure posturing compliance in patients after macular hole surgery: a pilot study.

Authors:  Martin Alexander Leitritz; Focke Ziemssen; Bogomil Voykov; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Macular Hole Surgery with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Facilitated by Membrane-Blue® versus Membrane-Blue-Dual®: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Uri Soiberman; Daniel Shai; Anat Loewenstein; Adiel Barak
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 5.  Optical coherence tomography in the preoperative and postoperative management of macular hole and epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  Roger A Goldberg; Nadia K Waheed; Jay S Duker
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Minification of fundus optical coherence tomographic images in gas-filled eye.

Authors:  Toshifumi Yamashita; Hiroto Terasaki; Taiji Sakamoto
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Wide-field laser ophthalmoscopy for imaging of gas-filled eyes after macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Shintaro Nakao; Ryoichi Arita; Yuki Sato; Hiroshi Enaida; Akifumi Ueno; Takaaki Matsui; Hani Salehi-Had; Tatsuro Ishibashi; Koh-Hei Sonoda
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.