Literature DB >> 30746303

Predictive Model for Macular Hole Closure Speed: Insights From Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography.

Justis P Ehlers1,2, Atsuro Uchida1,2, Sunil K Srivastava1,2, Ming Hu1,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish a predictive model of macular hole (MH) closure speed.
METHODS: This study was a post hoc analysis of eyes that underwent full-thickness MH repair in the prospective PIONEER intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) study. The Bioptigen SDOIS system was used for iOCT imaging. All patients underwent standard small-gauge vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, gas tamponade, and postoperative facedown positioning. Before vitrectomy and after ILM peeling, various quantitative OCT measures related to MH were obtained, including MH geometry alterations and outer retinal features. Trans-gas OCT was performed on postoperative day 1 to evaluate MH closure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify predictors of early MH closure (i.e., postoperative day 1 [POD 1] closure).
RESULTS: Thirty-two (86%) out of 37 eyes were confirmed for MH closure at POD 1. At 3 months, MH closure was achieved in 35 (95%) eyes. After multivariate logistic regression analyses, seven covariates were determined as predictors for MH closure. These seven covariates included age, ellipsoid zone-retinal pigment epithelium expansion following ILM peel, preincision minimal width, post-ILM peel MH depth, change in MH volume, change in minimum MH width, and change in MH depth. Using these seven covariates, the area under the curve was 0.974. Cross-validation analysis indicated that intraoperative change in MH volume, intraoperative change in minimal width, and preincision minimal width were the most robust predictors for early MH.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that iOCT may be important in predicting MH closure speed and may be a surrogate for tissue properties/behavior. A future prospective clinical trial is needed to validate this model. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This study provides unique insights into the potential role of iOCT imaging in predicting retinal tissue behavior during MH repair.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intraoperative optical coherence tomography; macular hole

Year:  2019        PMID: 30746303      PMCID: PMC6366005          DOI: 10.1167/tvst.8.1.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol        ISSN: 2164-2591            Impact factor:   3.283


  32 in total

1.  Anatomical outcomes of surgery for idiopathic macular hole as determined by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Michael S Ip; Brad J Baker; Jay S Duker; Elias Reichel; Caroline R Baumal; Ronald Gangnon; Carmen A Puliafito
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-01

2.  Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  S Ullrich; C Haritoglou; C Gass; M Schaumberger; M W Ulbig; A Kampik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Pulmonary embolism following head positioning for retinal reattachment surgery in a young patient with factor V leiden mutation.

Authors:  K G Au Eong; S Beatty; W Thomas; V Sen; G S Turner
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-09

4.  Bilateral Ulnar nerve palsies: an unusual complication of posturing after macular hole surgery.

Authors:  A Salam; P Harrington; A Raj; A Babar
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Five-year follow-up of macular hole surgery with peeling of the internal limiting membrane: update of a prospective study.

Authors:  Christos Haritoglou; Ingrid W Reiniger; Markus Schaumberger; Carolin A Gass; Siegfried G Priglinger; Anselm Kampik
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Macular hole surgery with air tamponade and optical coherence tomography-based duration of face-down positioning.

Authors:  Claus Eckardt; Tillmann Eckert; Ute Eckardt; Ute Porkert; Caroline Gesser
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Staining of internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  K Kadonosono; N Itoh; E Uchio; S Nakamura; S Ohno
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-08

8.  Ulnar neuropathy as a complication of macular hole surgery.

Authors:  N M Holekamp; T A Meredith; M B Landers; W B Snyder; J T Thompson; A J Berman; S Williams
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-12

9.  Comparison of face-down and seated position after idiopathic macular hole surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Alexandre Guillaubey; Laure Malvitte; Pierre Olivier Lafontaine; Nicolas Jay; Isabelle Hubert; Alain Bron; Jean Paul Berrod; Catherine Creuzot-Garcher
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Posturing time after macular hole surgery modified by optical coherence tomography images: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kyoko Masuyama; Keita Yamakiri; Noboru Arimura; Yasushi Sonoda; Norihito Doi; Taiji Sakamoto
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  [Real-time optical coherence tomography-assisted high-precision vitreoretinal surgery in the clinical routine].

Authors:  M Maier; L O Hattenbach; J Klein; A Nasseri; A Chronopoulos; M Strobel; C P Lohmann; N Feucht
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Automatic evaluation of graft orientation during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty using intraoperative OCT.

Authors:  Marc B Muijzer; Friso G Heslinga; Floor Couwenberg; Herke-Jan Noordmans; Abdelkarim Oahalou; Josien P W Pluim; Mitko Veta; Robert P L Wisse
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Optical Coherence Tomography based indices in predicting functional outcome of macular hole surgery: A retrospective chart review.

Authors:  Haroon Tayyab; Rehman Siddiqui; Sana Jahangir; Shiraz Hashmi
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  LONGITUDINAL ELLIPSOID ZONE DYNAMICS AFTER MACULAR HOLE REPAIR IN THE DISCOVER STUDY: Structure-Function Assessment.

Authors:  Duriye Damla Sevgi; Philina S Yee; Sunil K Srivastava; Thuy K Le; Joseph R Abraham; Jamie Reese; Justis P Ehlers
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.975

Review 5.  [Biomarkers in full-thickness and lamellar defects of the macula].

Authors:  M Maier; R Schumann; J Friedrich; J Klaas; C Haritoglou
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.174

6.  [iOCT in clinical use : Correlation of intraoperative morphology and postoperative visual outcome in patients with full thickness macular hole].

Authors:  Julia Sabina Friedrich; Nathalie Bleidißel; Ali Nasseri; Nikolaus Feucht; Julian Klaas; Chris Patrick Lohmann; Mathias Maier
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 1.174

7.  Efficacy of Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Treatment of Large Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Holes.

Authors:  Suthasinee Sinawat; Sukita Jumpawong; Tanapat Ratanapakorn; Chavakij Bhoomibunchoo; Yosanan Yospaiboon; Supat Sinawat
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-11

8.  Intraoperative Retinal Changes May Predict Surgical Outcomes After Epiretinal Membrane Peeling.

Authors:  Lekha K Mukkamala; Jaycob Avaylon; R Joel Welch; Amirfarbod Yazdanyar; Parisa Emami-Naeini; Sophia Wong; Jordan Storkersen; Jessica Loo; David Cunefare; Sina Farsiu; Ala Moshiri; Susanna S Park; Glenn Yiu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.048

9.  Air-Liquid Exchange by Free Hand and One Needle for Unhealed Macular Hole.

Authors:  Haishuang Lin; Yiting Ji; Luqi Xia; Bo Lin; Zhihua Li; Zhixiang Hu; Ronghan Wu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 10.  Clinical applications for intraoperative optical coherence tomography: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marc B Muijzer; Peter A W J Schellekens; Henny J M Beckers; Joke H de Boer; Saskia M Imhof; Robert P L Wisse
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.775

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.