Literature DB >> 11853720

Shortening the duration of prone positioning after macular hole surgery- comparison between 1-week and 1-day prone positioning.

Takako Isomae1, Yukihiro Sato, Hiroyuki Shimada.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To shorten the duration of prone positioning after macular hole surgery from 1 week to 1 day, and to evaluate preoperative factors and the initial hole closure rate.
METHODS: The subjects were 33 patients (34 eyes) who underwent macular hole surgery between April 1998 and August 1999, and maintained the prone position for 1 week (1-week group) and 21 patients (21 eyes) who underwent this operation between September 1999 and March 2000, and maintained the prone position for only 1 day (1-day group). The criteria for macular hole surgery were no more than 6 months since symptom development and no flattening of the fluid cuff. Eyes treated by removal of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) or internal limiting membrane (ILM) were excluded. In all phakic eyes, cataract surgery was combined with macular hole surgery. In the 1-day group, the patients maintained the prone position for 1 day and were instructed to avoid only the supine position for the subsequent 1 week.
RESULTS: Preoperative factors possibly affecting the hole closure rate did not differ significantly between the two groups. Initial hole closure rates were similar in the 1-week (91.2%) and 1-day (90.5%) groups.
CONCLUSION: In eyes without symptoms of long duration, the duration of prone positioning after macular hole surgery may be shortened to 1 day even without using special techniques, such as removal of the RPE or ILM, in combination with macular hole surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11853720     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-5155(01)00468-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  8 in total

1.  Pilot randomised controlled trial of face-down positioning following macular hole surgery.

Authors:  C A K Lange; L Membrey; N Ahmad; L Wickham; R E Maclaren; L Solebo; W Xing; C Bunce; E Ezra; D Charteris; B Aylward; D Yorston; Z Gregor; H Zambarakji; J W Bainbridge
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  [Macular hole surgery with air tamponade. Does air suffice for short-term tamponade?].

Authors:  C Gesser; T Eckert; U Eckardt; U Porkert; C Eckardt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Macular hole. Survey and relevant surgical concepts].

Authors:  S Dithmar
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Equivalent tamponade by room air as compared with SF(6) after macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Yuhei Hasegawa; Yasuaki Hata; Yasutaka Mochizuki; Ryoichi Arita; Shuhei Kawahara; Takeshi Kita; Yoshihiro Noda; Tatsuro Ishibashi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Factors affecting imaging of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in gas-filled eyes after macular-hole surgery.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Goto; Kenichi Mizukawa; Junichi Kiryu
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Optical coherence tomography-guided facedown positioning for macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Sumit P Shah; Varsha Manjunath; Adam H Rogers; Caroline R Baumal; Elias Reichel; Jay S Duker
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Long-term outcomes of 3 surgical adjuvants used for internal limiting membrane peeling in idiopathic macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Noriko Mochizuki; Teiko Yamamoto; Hiroshi Enaida; Tatsuro Ishibashi; Hidetoshi Yamashita
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Combined pars plana lensectomy/vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole repair without postoperative prone positioning.

Authors:  Nicola G Ghazi; Armand Daccache; Robert Knape; James S Tiedeman
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.