Literature DB >> 17031290

Outcomes of macular hole surgery and shortened face down positioning.

Jason C Wickens1, Gaurav K Shah.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in macular hole surgery may allow a shortened period of face down positioning. This study reports the results of macular hole surgery combined with shortened (3-day) face down positioning.
METHODS: The study was a retrospective review of data for 21 patients (21 eyes) treated for a macular hole by a single surgeon (G.K.S.). All patients underwent standard 3-port pars plana vitrectomy with triamcinolone-assisted ILM peeling and gas tamponade with 16% C3F8 or 25% SF6. Patients were instructed to remain in a face down position for 3 days at least 8 hours a day and to avoid flat on back positioning.
RESULTS: The main outcome of anatomical closure was achieved in 20 (95%) of 21 eyes. Snellen visual acuity improved >2 lines in 76% (16/21) of patients. No patient lost >1 line of Snellen visual acuity. Two patients had postoperative increased (>24 mmHg) intraocular pressure that was successfully treated with pressure-lowering drops. Initial surgery failed to achieve hole closure in one patient, but with a second surgery and similar face down positioning, the hole was closed.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found that macular hole surgery with ILM peeling and a shortened period of face down positioning achieves excellent anatomical closure and is not associated with significant adverse outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17031290     DOI: 10.1097/01.iae.0000233338.56252.44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  5 in total

1.  [Macular hole surgery with air tamponade. Does air suffice for short-term tamponade?].

Authors:  C Gesser; T Eckert; U Eckardt; U Porkert; C Eckardt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Optical coherence tomography-guided facedown positioning for macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Sumit P Shah; Varsha Manjunath; Adam H Rogers; Caroline R Baumal; Elias Reichel; Jay S Duker
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 3.  Complications of Macular Peeling.

Authors:  Mónica Asencio-Duran; Beatriz Manzano-Muñoz; José Luis Vallejo-García; Jesús García-Martínez
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Evaluation of predictors for anatomical success in macular hole surgery in Indian population.

Authors:  Atul Kumar; Varun Gogia; Prakhar Kumar; Srivats Sehra; Shikha Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Outcome of 2 cc pure sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade for macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Naresh B Kannan; Olukorede O Adenuga; Karthik Kumar; Kim Ramasamy
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.209

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.