| Literature DB >> 23342053 |
Xiao L Moore1, Danielle Michell, Sabrina Lee, Michael R Skilton, Rajesh Nair, John B Dixon, Anthony M Dart, Jaye Chin-Dusting.
Abstract
Carotid intima-media-thickness (cIMT) and carotid distensibility (distensibility), structural and functional properties of carotid arteries respectively, are early markers, as well as strong predictors of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The characteristic of these two parameters in individuals with BMI>40.0 kg/m(2) (Class III obesity), however, are largely unknown. The present study was designed to document cIMT and distensibility in this population and to relate these to other factors with established association with CVD in obesity. The study included 96 subjects (65 with BMI>40.0 kg/m(2) and 31, age- and gender-matched, with BMI of 18.5 to 30.0 kg/m(2)). cIMT and distensibility were measured by non-invasive high resolution ultrasonography, circulatory CD133(+)/KDR(+) angiogenic cells and endothelial microparticles (EMP) by flow cytometry, and plasma levels of adipokines, growth factors and cytokines by Luminex immunoassay kits. The study results demonstrated increased cIMT (0.62±0.11 mm vs. 0.54±0.08 mm, P = 0.0002) and reduced distensibility (22.52±10.79 10(-3)kpa(-1)vs. 29.91±12.37 10(-3)kpa(-1), P<0.05) in individuals with BMI>40.0 kg/m(2). Both cIMT and distensibility were significantly associated with traditional CVD risk factors, adiposity/adipokines and inflammatory markers but had no association with circulating angiogenic cells. We also demonstrated, for the first time, elevated plasma EMP levels in individuals with BMI>40.0 kg/m(2). In conclusion, cIMT is increased and distensibility reduced in Class III obesity with the changes predominantly related to conventional CVD risk factors present in this condition, demonstrating that both cIMT and distensibility remain as CVD markers in Class III obesity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23342053 PMCID: PMC3546965 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Illustration of FACS gating analysis of angiogenic cells (AC133+/KDR+PBMCs).
Representative flow cytometric density plots demonstrating the gating protocol used to identify angiogenic cells: A) PBMCs stained with PE-conjugated and APC-conjugated mouse IgG (isotype controls) for non-specific fluorescent signals; B) PBMCs stained with antibodies against human CD133 (AC133) (PE-conjugated) and VEGFR-2 (KDR) (APC-conjugated) for AC133+/KDR+PBMCs; A1, B1) FSC-SSC density dot plots of Ficoll-isolated PBMCs and R1 was gated for monocytes; A2, B2) FL2 (PE)-FL4 (APC) density dot plots of R1-gated monocytes. Angiogenic cells = cells in B2 upper-right quadrant – cells in A2 upper-right quadrant.
Figure 2Elevated levels of circulating CD31+/CD41− EMP in obesity.
A)Quantification of circulating EMP levels in plasma. Data presented as mean±SEM. B) Representative flow cytometric density plots demonstrating the gating protocol used to identify EMP (R2) and bead populations (R1); C) Representative flow cytometric histogram of commercial beads; D) Representative flow cytometric dot plots demonstrating EMP population with a negative staining of CD41-PE but positive staining of CD31-Alexa 647 and its corresponding staining of isotype-controls.
Anthropometric, clinical and biochemical characteristics.
| Non-obese | Severely Obese |
| |
| (n = 31) | (n = 65) | ||
| Age, y | 48.13±11.16 | 46.44±8.73 | 0.42 |
| Male sex, % | 48 | 52 | 0.72 |
| Smoking, % | 52 | 52 | 0.97 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 120.47±16.78 | 139.9±17.59 | <0.0001 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 73.75±10.98 | 85.88±11.22 | <0.0001 |
| Mean arterial pressure, mmHg | 88.43±11.98 | 103.06±11.82 | <0.0001 |
| Pulse pressure, mmHg | 46.72 (42.6, 50.8) | 54.03 (50.4, 57.6) | 0.014 |
| Hypertension, % | 26 | 60 | 0.001 |
| Blood Pressure-Medication, % | 13 | 50 | <0.0001 |
| Fasting glucose, mmol/L | 4.82 (4.7, 5.0) | 6.33 (5.7, 7.0) | <0.0001 |
| Type 2 Diabetes, % | 7 | 56 | <0.0001 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 5.28 (4.9, 5.7) | 5.18 (5.7, 7.0) | 0.70 |
| HDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 1.56 (1.4, 1.8) | 1.17 (1.1, 1.2) | <0.0001 |
| LDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 3.25±0.87 | 3.17±0.99 | 0.69 |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 1.02 (0.9, 1.2) | 1.88 (1.7, 2.1) | <0.0001 |
| Body mass index (BMI), kg/m2 | 25.51±2.61 | 45.46±5.47 | <0.0001 |
| Waist:Hip | 0.85±0.09 | 0.97±0.09 | <0.0001 |
| Leptin, ng/ml | 11.46 (7.2, 15.7) | 41.0 (33.8, 48.1) | <0.0001 |
| Adiponectin, µg/ml | 48.90 (39.4, 58.4) | 14.6 (9.8, 19.5) | <0.0001 |
| White blood cells (WBC), 109/L | 5.47±1.19 | 7.58±1.83 | <0.0001 |
| hsCRP, mg/L | 1.19 (0.8, 1.5) | 6.41 (5.6, 7.2) | <0.0001 |
| Interleukin-10 (IL-10), pg/ml | 30.45 (13.7, 47.2) | 6.7 (4.1, 9.3) | 0.007 |
| CD133+KDR+ PBMC, % | 0.34 (0.32, 0.35) | 0.34 (0.32, 0.36) | 0.91 |
| Hill-colony forming units | 4.06 (1.7, 6.4) | 11.7 (7.0, 16.4) | 0.005 |
| SDF-1, pg/ml | 1492.31±554.09 | 2929.83±2387.46 | <0.0001 |
Data are expressed as means±SD (non-transformed data) or geometric means (95% CI) (transformed data). HDL indicates high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; SDF-1, stromal cell-derived factor-1.
Figure 3Increased cIMT (A) and reduced distensibility (B) in obesity.
Median, minimum and maximum values of cIMT and distensibility.
Bivariate correlation between BMI, Waist:Hip, SBP, cIMT and CD with other covariates.
| BMI | Waist/Hip | SBP | cIMT | CD | ||||||
| r | p-value | r | p-value | r | p-value | r | p-value | R | p-value | |
| Age | −0.080 | 0.48 | −0.056 | 0.60 | 0.084 | 0.43 |
|
| − |
|
| Gender | 0.123 | 0.28 |
|
| 0.143 | 0.17 | 0.065 | 0.54 | −0.115 | 0.29 |
| Smoking | 0.062 | 0.59 | 0.193 | 0.09 | 0.114 | 0.32 | 0.128 | 0.27 | −0.127 | 0.28 |
| SBP |
|
|
|
| – | – |
|
| − |
|
| Hypertension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| − |
|
| BP-Med |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.213 | 0.06 | − |
|
| Type 2 Diabetes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| − |
|
| Fasting glucose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| − |
|
| HDL cholesterol | − |
| − |
| −0.158 | 0.13 | −0.143 | 0.18 | 0.026 | 0.81 |
| LDL cholesterol | 0.014 | 0.91 | 0.140 | 0.19 | 0.144 | 0.17 | 0.107 | 0.32 | 0.019 | 0.86 |
| Triglycerides |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| −0.221 | 0.06 |
| BMI | – | – |
|
|
|
|
|
| − |
|
| Waist:Hip |
|
| – | – |
|
|
|
| − |
|
| Adiponectin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.12 |
|
|
| Leptin |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.220 | 0.056 |
|
|
| hsCRP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| IL-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
| −0.168 | 0.15 | 0.079 | 0.51 |
| WBC |
|
|
|
| 0.216 | 0.051 | 0.170 | 0.13 | −0.115 | 0.32 |
| CD133+KDR+PBMC,% | −0.003 | 0.98 | 0.026 | 0.81 | 0.120 | 0.25 | 0.128 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.87 |
| Hill-colony forming units | 0.141 | 0.28 | 0.145 | 0.22 | 0.116 | 0.33 | −0.116 | 0.33 | 0.023 | 0.85 |
| SDF-1 |
|
| 0.110 | 0.34 | 0.198 | 0.08 | 0.126 | 0.28 | −0.096 | 0.42 |
BP-Med indicates blood pressure related medication, SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Multivariable linear Regression Analyses.
| cIMT | CD | ||||
| Model | β | p-value | β | p-value | |
|
| |||||
| Age |
|
| − |
| |
| SBP | 0.199 | 0.08 | − |
| |
|
| |||||
| Age |
|
| − |
| |
| SBP | 0.031 | 0.81 | − |
| |
| BP-med | 0.065 | 0.56 | − |
| |
| BMI |
|
| − |
| |
| Adiponectin | 0.004 | 0.98 |
|
| |
|
| |||||
| Age |
|
| − |
| |
| SBP | −0.015 | 0.91 | − |
| |
| BP-Med | 0.042 | 0.72 | − |
| |
| BMI |
|
| −0.300 | 0.16 | |
| Adiponectin | −0.076 | 0.66 |
|
| |
|
| |||||
| Age |
|
| − |
| |
|
| |||||
| Age |
|
| − |
| |
| BMI |
|
| −0.096 | 0.58 | |
| Adiponectin | 0.000 | 0.999 |
|
| |
|
| |||||
| Age |
|
| − |
| |
| BMI |
|
| −0.322 | 0.12 | |
| Adiponectin | −0.061 | 0.72 |
|
| |
Model 1 was adjusted for traditional CVRF (age, SBP, BP-med, fasting glucose and triglycerides), while Model 2 for traditional CVRF and adiposity/adipokines (BMI, adiponectin and leptin), and Model 3 for traditional CVRF, adiposity/adipokines and inflammatory markers (hsCRP, IL10 and WBC). Results are expressed as standardized β and only factors showing significant association are listed.