BACKGROUND: Intima-media thickness of the walls of the common carotid artery and internal carotid artery may add to the Framingham risk score for predicting cardiovascular events. METHODS: We measured the mean intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery and the maximum intima-media thickness of the internal carotid artery in 2965 members of the Framingham Offspring Study cohort. Cardiovascular-disease outcomes were evaluated for an average follow-up of 7.2 years. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models were generated for intima-media thickness and risk factors. We evaluated the reclassification of cardiovascular disease on the basis of the 8-year Framingham risk score category (low, intermediate, or high) after adding intima-media thickness values. RESULTS: A total of 296 participants had a cardiovascular event. The risk factors of the Framingham risk score predicted these events, with a C statistic of 0.748 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.719 to 0.776). The adjusted hazard ratio for cardiovascular disease with a 1-SD increase in the mean intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery was 1.13 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.24), with a nonsignificant change in the C statistic of 0.003 (95% CI, 0.000 to 0.007); the corresponding hazard ratio for the maximum intima-media thickness of the internal carotid artery was 1.21 (95% CI, 1.13 to 1.29), with a modest increase in the C statistic of 0.009 (95% CI, 0.003 to 0.016). The net reclassification index increased significantly after addition of intima-media thickness of the internal carotid artery (7.6%, P<0.001) but not intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery (0.0%, P=0.99). With the presence of plaque, defined as intima-media thickness of the internal carotid artery of more than 1.5 mm, the net reclassification index was 7.3% (P=0.01), with an increase in the C statistic of 0.014 (95% CI, 0.003 to 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The maximum internal and mean common carotid-artery intima-media thicknesses both predict cardiovascular outcomes, but only the maximum intima-media thickness of (and presence of plaque in) the internal carotid artery significantly (albeit modestly) improves the classification of risk of cardiovascular disease in the Framingham Offspring Study cohort. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.).
BACKGROUND: Intima-media thickness of the walls of the common carotid artery and internal carotid artery may add to the Framingham risk score for predicting cardiovascular events. METHODS: We measured the mean intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery and the maximum intima-media thickness of the internal carotid artery in 2965 members of the Framingham Offspring Study cohort. Cardiovascular-disease outcomes were evaluated for an average follow-up of 7.2 years. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models were generated for intima-media thickness and risk factors. We evaluated the reclassification of cardiovascular disease on the basis of the 8-year Framingham risk score category (low, intermediate, or high) after adding intima-media thickness values. RESULTS: A total of 296 participants had a cardiovascular event. The risk factors of the Framingham risk score predicted these events, with a C statistic of 0.748 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.719 to 0.776). The adjusted hazard ratio for cardiovascular disease with a 1-SD increase in the mean intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery was 1.13 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.24), with a nonsignificant change in the C statistic of 0.003 (95% CI, 0.000 to 0.007); the corresponding hazard ratio for the maximum intima-media thickness of the internal carotid artery was 1.21 (95% CI, 1.13 to 1.29), with a modest increase in the C statistic of 0.009 (95% CI, 0.003 to 0.016). The net reclassification index increased significantly after addition of intima-media thickness of the internal carotid artery (7.6%, P<0.001) but not intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery (0.0%, P=0.99). With the presence of plaque, defined as intima-media thickness of the internal carotid artery of more than 1.5 mm, the net reclassification index was 7.3% (P=0.01), with an increase in the C statistic of 0.014 (95% CI, 0.003 to 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The maximum internal and mean common carotid-artery intima-media thicknesses both predict cardiovascular outcomes, but only the maximum intima-media thickness of (and presence of plaque in) the internal carotid artery significantly (albeit modestly) improves the classification of risk of cardiovascular disease in the Framingham Offspring Study cohort. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.).
Authors: A I del Sol; K G Moons; M Hollander; A Hofman; P J Koudstaal; D E Grobbee; M M Breteler; J C Witteman; M L Bots Journal: Stroke Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Philip Greenland; Joseph S Alpert; George A Beller; Emelia J Benjamin; Matthew J Budoff; Zahi A Fayad; Elyse Foster; Mark A Hlatky; John McB Hodgson; Frederick G Kushner; Michael S Lauer; Leslee J Shaw; Sidney C Smith; Allen J Taylor; William S Weintraub; Nanette K Wenger; Alice K Jacobs Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: L E Chambless; A R Folsom; L X Clegg; A R Sharrett; E Shahar; F J Nieto; W D Rosamond; G Evans Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2000-03-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Joseph F Polak; Michael J Pencina; Allison Meisner; Karol M Pencina; Lisa S Brown; Philip A Wolf; Ralph B D'Agostino Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Vijay Nambi; Lloyd Chambless; Aaron R Folsom; Max He; Yijuan Hu; Tom Mosley; Kelly Volcik; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie M Ballantyne Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jing Liu; Yuling Hong; Ralph B D'Agostino; Zhaosu Wu; Wei Wang; Jiayi Sun; Peter W F Wilson; William B Kannel; Dong Zhao Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-06-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joseph F Polak; Allison Meisner; Michael J Pencina; Philip A Wolf; Ralph B D'Agostino Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Anandita Agarwala; Salim Virani; David Couper; Lloyd Chambless; Eric Boerwinkle; Brad C Astor; Ron C Hoogeveen; Joe Coresh; A Richey Sharrett; Aaron R Folsom; Tom Mosley; Christie M Ballantyne; Vijay Nambi Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Michael H Criqui; Julie O Denenberg; Robyn L McClelland; Matthew A Allison; Joachim H Ix; Alan Guerci; Kevin P Cohoon; Preethi Srikanthan; Karol E Watson; Nathan D Wong Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 8.311