Chrisandra Shufelt1, Omeed Elboudwarej, B Delia Johnson, Puja Mehta, Vera Bittner, Glenn Braunstein, Sarah Berga, Frank Stanczyk, Kathleen Dwyer, C Noel Bairey Merz. 1. 1Barbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, and Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 2University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 3Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 5Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 6Department of Preventive Medicine, Institute for Prevention Research, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Observational studies have suggested that arterial distensibility decreases during menopause; however, its relationship with hormone therapy use remains controversial. We prospectively studied distensibility and hormone therapy use at different menopause stages. METHODS: One hundred sixty-one women (aged between 42 and 61 y) without cardiovascular disease underwent carotid artery measurements by ultrasound to calculate distensibility index at baseline and 3 years later. Menopause stage was classified at each visit as premenopausal, perimenopausal, and postmenopausal. Across 3 years of prospective observation, women were classified as remaining premenopausal, remaining postmenopausal, or transitioning (defined as change from premenopausal to perimenopausal, from premenopausal to postmenopausal, from perimenopausal to perimenopausal, or from perimenopausal to postmenopausal). RESULTS: Distensibility declined across time at all menopause stages (P < 0.0001). Compared with postmenopausal women, premenopausal and transitioning/no hormone therapy women had more than twice the decline in distensibility index (P = 0.06 and P = 0.016, respectively), whereas transitioning/hormone therapy women did not differ in distensibility decline (P = 0.28). In a multivariate model, change in systolic blood pressure (P < 0.0001) and change in pulse pressure (P = 0.004) were independent predictors of distensibility index change and served as effect modulators. In an adjusted model, women in the premenopausal and transitioning/no hormone therapy groups had a significantly faster decline in distensibility index (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively) compared with postmenopausal women, whereas the transitioning/hormone therapy group did not (P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm that the menopausal transition is associated with reduced vascular compliance. Hormone therapy is associated with better arterial distensibility only during the menopausal transition. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to determine whether hormone therapy use beyond the menopausal transition is related to distensibility.
OBJECTIVE: Observational studies have suggested that arterial distensibility decreases during menopause; however, its relationship with hormone therapy use remains controversial. We prospectively studied distensibility and hormone therapy use at different menopause stages. METHODS: One hundred sixty-one women (aged between 42 and 61 y) without cardiovascular disease underwent carotid artery measurements by ultrasound to calculate distensibility index at baseline and 3 years later. Menopause stage was classified at each visit as premenopausal, perimenopausal, and postmenopausal. Across 3 years of prospective observation, women were classified as remaining premenopausal, remaining postmenopausal, or transitioning (defined as change from premenopausal to perimenopausal, from premenopausal to postmenopausal, from perimenopausal to perimenopausal, or from perimenopausal to postmenopausal). RESULTS: Distensibility declined across time at all menopause stages (P < 0.0001). Compared with postmenopausal women, premenopausal and transitioning/no hormone therapy women had more than twice the decline in distensibility index (P = 0.06 and P = 0.016, respectively), whereas transitioning/hormone therapy women did not differ in distensibility decline (P = 0.28). In a multivariate model, change in systolic blood pressure (P < 0.0001) and change in pulse pressure (P = 0.004) were independent predictors of distensibility index change and served as effect modulators. In an adjusted model, women in the premenopausal and transitioning/no hormone therapy groups had a significantly faster decline in distensibility index (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively) compared with postmenopausal women, whereas the transitioning/hormone therapy group did not (P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm that the menopausal transition is associated with reduced vascular compliance. Hormone therapy is associated with better arterial distensibility only during the menopausal transition. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to determine whether hormone therapy use beyond the menopausal transition is related to distensibility.
Authors: C Giannattasio; M Failla; A Grappiolo; M L Stella; A Del Bo; M Colombo; G Mancia Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Ashkan A Malayeri; Shunsuke Natori; Hossein Bahrami; Alain G Bertoni; Richard Kronmal; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2008-05-24 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: C Rajkumar; B A Kingwell; J D Cameron; T Waddell; R Mehra; N Christophidis; P A Komesaroff; B McGrath; G L Jennings; K Sudhir; A M Dart Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Rachel P Wildman; Karen Matthews; Rebecca C Thurston; Joyce T Bromberger; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell Journal: Menopause Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Karen L Berry; James D Cameron; Anthony M Dart; Elizabeth M Dewar; Christoph D Gatzka; Garry L Jennings; Yu-Lu Liang; Chris M Reid; Bronwyn A Kingwell Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sebastian J Vermeersch; Ernst R Rietzschel; Marc L De Buyzere; Dirk De Bacquer; Guy De Backer; Luc M Van Bortel; Thierry C Gillebert; Pascal R Verdonck; Patrick Segers Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Girish V Nair; David Waters; William Rogers; Glen J Kowalchuk; Thomas D Stuckey; David M Herrington Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-11-15 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Xiao L Moore; Danielle Michell; Sabrina Lee; Michael R Skilton; Rajesh Nair; John B Dixon; Anthony M Dart; Jaye Chin-Dusting Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexandra Zormpala; Nikolaos V Sipsas; Ioannis Moyssakis; Sarah P Georgiadou; Maria N Gamaletsou; Athanasios N Kontos; Panayiotis D Ziakas; Theodore Kordossis Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2012-07-30 Impact factor: 3.090