Literature DB >> 23339246

Sexual networks: measuring sexual selection in structured, polyandrous populations.

Grant C McDonald1, Richard James, Jens Krause, Tommaso Pizzari.   

Abstract

Sexual selection is traditionally measured at the population level, assuming that populations lack structure. However, increasing evidence undermines this approach, indicating that intrasexual competition in natural populations often displays complex patterns of spatial and temporal structure. This complexity is due in part to the degree and mechanisms of polyandry within a population, which can influence the intensity and scale of both pre- and post-copulatory sexual competition. Attempts to measure selection at the local and global scale have been made through multi-level selection approaches. However, definitions of local scale are often based on physical proximity, providing a rather coarse measure of local competition, particularly in polyandrous populations where the local scale of pre- and post-copulatory competition may differ drastically from each other. These limitations can be solved by social network analysis, which allows us to define a unique sexual environment for each member of a population: 'local scale' competition, therefore, becomes an emergent property of a sexual network. Here, we first propose a novel quantitative approach to measure pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection, which integrates multi-level selection with information on local scale competition derived as an emergent property of networks of sexual interactions. We then use simple simulations to illustrate the ways in which polyandry can impact estimates of sexual selection. We show that for intermediate levels of polyandry, the proposed network-based approach provides substantially more accurate measures of sexual selection than the more traditional population-level approach. We argue that the increasing availability of fine-grained behavioural datasets provides exciting new opportunities to develop network approaches to study sexual selection in complex societies.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23339246      PMCID: PMC3576589          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  34 in total

1.  Design and Interpretation of Experimental Studies of Interdemic Selection: A Reply to Getty.

Authors:  Michael J Wade; Charles J Goodnight; Lori Stevens
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Sexual selection affects local extinction and turnover in bird communities.

Authors:  Paul F Doherty; Gabriele Sorci; J Andrew Royle; James E Hines; James D Nichols; Thierry Boulinier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks.

Authors:  Hisashi Ohtsuki; Christoph Hauert; Erez Lieberman; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Sexual selection and the evolution of evolvability.

Authors:  M Petrie; G Roberts
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Antagonistic multilevel selection on size and architecture in variable density settings.

Authors:  Cynthia Weinig; Jill A Johnston; Charles G Willis; Julin N Maloof
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Spatial mating networks in insect-pollinated plants.

Authors:  Miguel A Fortuna; Cristina García; Paulo R Guimarães; Jordi Bascompte
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Sexually selected traits predict patterns of species richness in a diverse clade of suboscine birds.

Authors:  Nathalie Seddon; Richard M Merrill; Joseph A Tobias
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Automated mapping of social networks in wild birds.

Authors:  Christian Rutz; Zackory T Burns; Richard James; Stefanie M H Ismar; John Burt; Brian Otis; Jayson Bowen; James J H St Clair
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  The role of multilevel selection in the evolution of sexual conflict in the water strider aquarius remigis.

Authors:  Omar Tonsi Eldakar; David Sloan Wilson; Michael J Dlugos; John W Pepper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  High-throughput ethomics in large groups of Drosophila.

Authors:  Kristin Branson; Alice A Robie; John Bender; Pietro Perona; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  13 in total

1.  Differential female sociality is linked with the fine-scale structure of sexual interactions in replicate groups of red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Lewis G Spurgin; Eleanor A Fairfield; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The polyandry revolution.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Structure of sexual networks determines the operation of sexual selection.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Interspecific social networks promote information transmission in wild songbirds.

Authors:  Damien R Farine; Lucy M Aplin; Ben C Sheldon; William Hoppitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Comparing pre- and post-copulatory mate competition using social network analysis in wild crickets.

Authors:  David N Fisher; Rolando Rodríguez-Muñoz; Tom Tregenza
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis.

Authors:  Damien R Farine; Hal Whitehead
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Sex peptide receptor-regulated polyandry modulates the balance of pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  Juliano Morimoto; Grant C McDonald; Emelia Smith; Damian T Smith; Jennifer C Perry; Tracey Chapman; Tommaso Pizzari; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Wild cricket social networks show stability across generations.

Authors:  David N Fisher; Rolando Rodríguez-Muñoz; Tom Tregenza
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  The contrasting role of male relatedness in different mechanisms of sexual selection in red junglefowl.

Authors:  Cedric Kai Wei Tan; Philippa Doyle; Emma Bagshaw; David S Richardson; Stuart Wigby; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.