Literature DB >> 17119550

Sexual selection and the evolution of evolvability.

M Petrie1, G Roberts.   

Abstract

Here we show that sexual selection can have an effect on the rate of mutation. We simulated the fate of a genetic modifier of the mutation rate in a sexual population with and without sexual selection (modelled using a female choice mechanism). Female choice for 'good genes' should reduce variability among male subjects, leaving insufficient differences to maintain female preferences. However, female choice can actually increase genetic variability by supporting a higher mutation rate in sexually selected traits. Increasing the mutation rate will be selected against because of the resulting decline in mean fitness. However, it also increases the probability of rare beneficial mutations arising, and mating skew caused by female preferences for male subjects carrying those beneficials with few deleterious mutations ('good genes') can lead to a mutation rate above that expected under natural selection. A choice of two male subjects was sufficient for there to be a twofold increase in the mutation rate as opposed to a decrease found under random mating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17119550     DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  12 in total

Review 1.  Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms.

Authors:  Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Evolution of an avian pigmentation gene correlates with a measure of sexual selection.

Authors:  Nicola J Nadeau; Terry Burke; Nicholas I Mundy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The mitonuclear compatibility hypothesis of sexual selection.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hill; James D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Variation in the peacock's train shows a genetic component.

Authors:  Marion Petrie; Peter Cotgreave; Thomas W Pike
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Sexual selection, body mass and molecular evolution interact to predict diversification in birds.

Authors:  Maider Iglesias-Carrasco; Michael D Jennions; Simon Y W Ho; David A Duchêne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sexual networks: measuring sexual selection in structured, polyandrous populations.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Richard James; Jens Krause; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Experimental evidence for effects of sexual selection on condition-dependent mutation rates.

Authors:  Julian Baur; David Berger
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 15.460

8.  Assortative mating in fallow deer reduces the strength of sexual selection.

Authors:  Mary E Farrell; Elodie Briefer; Tom Hayden; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Programmed genetic instability: a tumor-permissive mechanism for maintaining the evolvability of higher species through methylation-dependent mutation of DNA repair genes in the male germ line.

Authors:  Yongzhong Zhao; Richard J Epstein
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Male dominance linked to size and age, but not to 'good genes' in brown trout (Salmo trutta).

Authors:  Alain Jacob; Sébastien Nusslé; Adrian Britschgi; Guillaume Evanno; Rudolf Müller; Claus Wedekind
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.