Literature DB >> 16724065

A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks.

Hisashi Ohtsuki1, Christoph Hauert, Erez Lieberman, Martin A Nowak.   

Abstract

A fundamental aspect of all biological systems is cooperation. Cooperative interactions are required for many levels of biological organization ranging from single cells to groups of animals. Human society is based to a large extent on mechanisms that promote cooperation. It is well known that in unstructured populations, natural selection favours defectors over cooperators. There is much current interest, however, in studying evolutionary games in structured populations and on graphs. These efforts recognize the fact that who-meets-whom is not random, but determined by spatial relationships or social networks. Here we describe a surprisingly simple rule that is a good approximation for all graphs that we have analysed, including cycles, spatial lattices, random regular graphs, random graphs and scale-free networks: natural selection favours cooperation, if the benefit of the altruistic act, b, divided by the cost, c, exceeds the average number of neighbours, k, which means b/c > k. In this case, cooperation can evolve as a consequence of 'social viscosity' even in the absence of reputation effects or strategic complexity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16724065      PMCID: PMC2430087          DOI: 10.1038/nature04605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  22 in total

1.  Emergence of scaling in random networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Cooperation through image scoring in humans.

Authors:  C Wedekind; M Milinski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Population viscosity and the evolution of altruism.

Authors:  J Mitteldorf; D S Wilson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2000-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  A dynamic model of social network formation.

Authors:  B Skyrms; R Pemantle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cooperation for volunteering and partially random partnerships.

Authors:  György Szabó; Jeromos Vukov
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2004-03-19

6.  Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game.

Authors:  Christoph Hauert; Michael Doebeli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity.

Authors:  Martin A Nowak; Karl Sigmund
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation.

Authors:  F C Santos; J M Pacheco
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 9.161

9.  The evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  R Axelrod; W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

View more
  336 in total

1.  Graph fission in an evolving voter model.

Authors:  Richard Durrett; James P Gleeson; Alun L Lloyd; Peter J Mucha; Feng Shi; David Sivakoff; Joshua E S Socolar; Chris Varghese
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The recognition signal hypothesis for the adaptive evolution of religion : a phylogenetic test with Christian denominations.

Authors:  Luke J Matthews
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-06

3.  Imitation dynamics of vaccination behaviour on social networks.

Authors:  Feng Fu; Daniel I Rosenbloom; Long Wang; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  How life history and demography promote or inhibit the evolution of helping behaviours.

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann; François Rousset
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Evolutionary causes and consequences of consistent individual variation in cooperative behaviour.

Authors:  Ralph Bergmüller; Roger Schürch; Ian M Hamilton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Invasion and expansion of cooperators in lattice populations: prisoner's dilemma vs. snowdrift games.

Authors:  Feng Fu; Martin A Nowak; Christoph Hauert
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 7.  Personality in the context of social networks.

Authors:  J Krause; R James; D P Croft
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Public goods games with reward in finite populations.

Authors:  Peter A I Forsyth; Christoph Hauert
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Model of genetic variation in human social networks.

Authors:  James H Fowler; Christopher T Dawes; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Offspring social network structure predicts fitness in families.

Authors:  Nick J Royle; Thomas W Pike; Philipp Heeb; Heinz Richner; Mathias Kölliker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.