Literature DB >> 23339235

Selection on female remating interval is influenced by male sperm competition strategies and ejaculate characteristics.

Suzanne H Alonzo1, Tommaso Pizzari.   

Abstract

Female remating rate dictates the level of sperm competition in a population, and extensive research has focused on how sperm competition generates selection on male ejaculate allocation. Yet the way ejaculate allocation strategies in turn generate selection on female remating rates, which ultimately influence levels of sperm competition, has received much less consideration despite increasing evidence that both mating itself and ejaculate traits affect multiple components of female fitness. Here, we develop theory to examine how the effects of mating on female fertility, fecundity and mortality interact to generate selection on female remating rate. When males produce more fertile ejaculates, females are selected to mate less frequently, thus decreasing levels of sperm competition. This could in turn favour decreased male ejaculate allocation, which could subsequently lead to higher female remating. When remating simultaneously increases female fecundity and mortality, females are selected to mate more frequently, thus exacerbating sperm competition and favouring male traits that convey a competitive advantage even when harmful to female survival. While intuitive when considered separately, these predictions demonstrate the potential for complex coevolutionary dynamics between male ejaculate expenditure and female remating rate, and the correlated evolution of multiple male and female reproductive traits affecting mating, fertility and fecundity.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23339235      PMCID: PMC3576578          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  44 in total

1.  Male reproductive senescence causes potential for sexual conflict over mating.

Authors:  Rebecca Dean; Charlie K Cornwallis; Hanne Løvlie; Kirsty Worley; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Sperm viability matters in insect sperm competition.

Authors:  Francisco García-González; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  The evolution of sperm-allocation strategies and the degree of sperm competition.

Authors:  Paul D Williams; Troy Day; Erin Cameron
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers.

Authors:  Rhonda R Snook
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-11-06       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Why are males bad for females? Models for the evolution of damaging male mating behavior.

Authors:  C M Lessells
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 6.  The evolutionary ecology of pre- and post-meiotic sperm senescence.

Authors:  Tom Pizzari; Rebecca Dean; Allan Pacey; Harry Moore; Michael B Bonsall
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculate composition.

Authors:  Erin Cameron; Troy Day; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 8.  Evolutionary explanations for cooperation.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ashleigh S Griffin; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  The importance of sperm limitation to the evolution of egg size in marine invertebrates.

Authors:  D R Levitan
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Seminal fluid protein depletion and replenishment in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster: an ELISA-based method for tracking individual ejaculates.

Authors:  Norene A Buehner; Anthony C Fiumera; Laura K Sirot; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 2.980

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Sexual conflict arising from extrapair matings in birds.

Authors:  Alexis S Chaine; Robert Montgomerie; Bruce E Lyon
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Evolution of male and female choice in polyandrous systems.

Authors:  Mikael Puurtinen; Lutz Fromhage
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The polyandry revolution.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Conceptual developments in sperm competition: a very brief synopsis.

Authors:  Geoff A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Seminal fluid and accessory male investment in sperm competition.

Authors:  Steven A Ramm
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Structure of sexual networks determines the operation of sexual selection.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Sexual cannibalism as a manifestation of sexual conflict.

Authors:  Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 10.005

8.  Evolution of female multiple mating: A quantitative model of the "sexually selected sperm" hypothesis.

Authors:  Greta Bocedi; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Mosquito biology. Evolution of sexual traits influencing vectorial capacity in anopheline mosquitoes.

Authors:  Sara N Mitchell; Evdoxia G Kakani; Adam South; Paul I Howell; Robert M Waterhouse; Flaminia Catteruccia
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Comparative analyses of reproductive structures in harvestmen (opiliones) reveal multiple transitions from courtship to precopulatory antagonism.

Authors:  Mercedes M Burns; Marshal Hedin; Jeffrey W Shultz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.