Literature DB >> 19425997

The importance of sperm limitation to the evolution of egg size in marine invertebrates.

D R Levitan.   

Abstract

Interspecific variation in egg size of marine invertebrates has been previously explained by a trade-off between gamete quality and quantity: the production of many small eggs with high mortality or fewer large eggs that develop quickly and experience reduced planktonic mortality. This theory assumes 100% fertilization of eggs and predicts that either strategy results in a similar number of settling offspring per unit of energy invested in reproduction. Empirical support for the theory has been equivocal. Here I offer an alternative hypothesis: larger eggs present a larger target for sperm and thus are fertilized at a higher rate. This theory suggests a trade-off between the production of many small eggs with a low probability of fertilization or fewer large eggs with a higher probability of fertilization. This hypothesis is tested with three congeneric sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus, and Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, with a fivefold difference in egg volume. Species with larger eggs are fertilized at a higher rate and, if one assumes an equal allocation of resources, produce at least as many zygotes as species with smaller, more numerous eggs. This alternate hypothesis can explain continuous variation in egg size between species and provides a strong link between larval and adult life histories.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 19425997     DOI: 10.1086/285489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  20 in total

1.  Prognostic value of three pro-nuclei (3PN) incidence in elective single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer.

Authors:  Mingzhao Li; Wanqiu Zhao; Wei Li; Xiaoli Zhao; Juanzi Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

2.  Gamete plasticity in a broadcast spawning marine invertebrate.

Authors:  Angela J Crean; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evolutionary trajectories explain the diversified evolution of isogamy and anisogamy in marine green algae.

Authors:  Tatsuya Togashi; John L Bartelt; Jin Yoshimura; Kei-ichi Tainaka; Paul Alan Cox
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Selection on female remating interval is influenced by male sperm competition strategies and ejaculate characteristics.

Authors:  Suzanne H Alonzo; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Sperm chemotaxis, fluid shear, and the evolution of sexual reproduction.

Authors:  Richard K Zimmer; Jeffrey A Riffell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Egg size in relation to fertilization dynamics in free-spawning tropical reef fishes.

Authors:  D Ross Robertson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The ecological and evolutionary consequences of sperm chemoattraction.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Riffell; Patrick J Krug; Richard K Zimmer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  In vitro fertilization experiments using sockeye salmon reveal that bigger eggs are more fertilizable under sperm limitation.

Authors:  Christopher P Macfarlane; Drew J Hoysak; N Robin Liley; Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Three pro-nuclei (3PN) incidence factors and clinical outcomes: a retrospective study from the fresh embryo transfer of in vitro fertilization with donor sperm (IVF-D).

Authors:  Mingzhao Li; Wanqiu Zhao; Xia Xue; Silin Zhang; Wenhao Shi; Juanzi Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

10.  Fertilization is not a new beginning: the relationship between sperm longevity and offspring performance.

Authors:  Angela J Crean; John M Dwyer; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.