Literature DB >> 15856692

The evolution of sperm-allocation strategies and the degree of sperm competition.

Paul D Williams1, Troy Day, Erin Cameron.   

Abstract

The prevailing viewpoint in the study of sperm competition is that male sperm-allocation strategies evolve in response to the degree of sperm competition an ejaculate can expect to experience within a given mating. If males cannot assess the degree of sperm competition their ejaculate will face and/or they are unable to facultatively adjust sperm investment in response to perceived levels of competition, high sperm allocation (per mating) is predicted to evolve in the context of high sperm competition. An implicit assumption of the framework used to derive this result is that the degree of sperm competition is unaffected by changes in sperm-allocation strategies. We present theory based on an alternative perspective, in which the degree of sperm competition and the sperm-allocation strategy are coupled traits that coevolve together. Our rationale is that the pattern of sperm allocation in the population will, in part, determine the level of sperm competition by affecting the number of ejaculates per female in the population. In this setting, evolution in sperm-allocation strategies is driven by changes in underlying environmental parameters that influence both the degree of sperm competition and sperm allocation. This change in perspective leads to predictions that are qualitatively different from those of previous theory.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15856692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

1.  Larger testes are associated with a higher level of polyandry, but a smaller ejaculate volume, across bushcricket species (Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  Karim Vahed; Darren J Parker; James D J Gilbert
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Condition-dependent ejaculate size and composition in a ladybird beetle.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness.

Authors:  Amanda Bretman; Claudia Fricke; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sperm investment in male meadow voles is affected by the condition of the nearby male conspecifics.

Authors:  Ashlee A Vaughn; Javier Delbarco-Trillo; Michael H Ferkin
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  Evolution of male and female choice in polyandrous systems.

Authors:  Mikael Puurtinen; Lutz Fromhage
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Selection on female remating interval is influenced by male sperm competition strategies and ejaculate characteristics.

Authors:  Suzanne H Alonzo; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Weighing costs and benefits of mating in bushcrickets (Insecta: Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae), with an emphasis on nuptial gifts, protandry and mate density.

Authors:  Gerlind U C Lehmann
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Reproductive behavior and fitness components in male Drosophila melaogaster are non-linearly affected by the number of male co-inhabitants early in adult life.

Authors:  B Nandy; N G Prasad
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.857

9.  Divergent allocation of sperm and the seminal proteome along a competition gradient in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ben R Hopkins; Irem Sepil; Marie-Laëtitia Thézénas; James F Craig; Thomas Miller; Philip D Charles; Roman Fischer; Benedikt M Kessler; Amanda Bretman; Tommaso Pizzari; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Experimental evolution under hyper-promiscuity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Richa Joag; David J Hosken; Nina Wedell; Jacek Radwan; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.260

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.