Literature DB >> 9160943

In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions.

M Jasty1, C Bragdon, D Burke, D O'Connor, J Lowenstein, W H Harris.   

Abstract

Cylindrical porous-coated implants were placed in the distal femoral metaphyses of twenty dogs and were subjected to zero, twenty, forty, or 150 micrometers of oscillatory motion for eight hours each day for six weeks with use of a specially designed loading apparatus. The in vivo skeletal responses to the different magnitudes of relative motion were evaluated. Histological analysis demonstrated growth of bone into the porous coatings of all of the implants, including those that had been subjected to 150 micrometers of motion. However, the ingrown bone was in continuity with the surrounding bone only in the groups of implants that had not been subjected to motion or that had been subjected to twenty micrometers of motion; in contrast, the implants that had been subjected to forty micrometers of motion were surrounded in part by trabecular bone but also in part by fibrocartilage and fibrous tissue, and those that had been subjected to 150 micrometers of motion were surrounded by dense fibrous tissue. Trabecular microfractures were identified around three of the five implants that had been subjected to forty micrometers of motion and around four of the five that had been subjected to 150 micrometers of motion, suggesting that the ingrown bone had failed at the interface because of the large movements. The architecture of the surrounding trabecular bone also was altered by the micromotion of the implant. The implants that had stable ingrowth of bone were surrounded by a zone of trabecular atrophy, whereas those that had unstable ingrowth of bone were surrounded by a zone of trabecular hypertrophy. The trabeculae surrounding the fibrocartilage or fibrous tissue that had formed around the implants that had been subjected to forty or 150 micrometers of motion had been organized into a shell of dense bone tangential to the implant (that is, a neocortex outside the non-osseous tissue).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9160943     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199705000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  57 in total

1.  Bilayered calcium phosphate coating to promote osseointegration of a femoral stem prosthesis.

Authors:  E Goyenvalle; N J M Guyen; E Aguado; N Passuti; G Daculsi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Influence of cup-center-edge angle on micro-motion at the interface between the cup and host bone in cementless total hip arthroplasty: three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Kaku; Tomonori Tabata; Hiroshi Tsumura
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-08-29

3.  Differences in subsidence rate between alternative designs of a commonly used uncemented femoral stem.

Authors:  Munnan Al-Najjim; Usman Khattak; Juluis Sim; Iain Chambers
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-07-05

Review 4.  How reverse shoulder arthroplasty works.

Authors:  Matthew Walker; Jordan Brooks; Matthew Willis; Mark Frankle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The influence of cementing technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty on the initial stability of the femoral component.

Authors:  Rudi G Bitsch; Sebastian Jäger; Marcus Lürssen; Travis Loidolt; Thomas P Schmalzried; Stefan Weiss
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Biomechanics and tissue engineering.

Authors:  D P Pioletti
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Interface micromotion of uncemented femoral components from postmortem retrieved total hip replacements.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; Mark A Miller; Peter A Costa; Amos Race; Timothy H Izant
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Periprosthetic bone mineral density and fixation of the uncemented CLS stem related to different weight bearing regimes: A randomized study using DXA and RSA in 38 patients followed for 5 years.

Authors:  Olof Wolf; Per Mattsson; Jan Milbrink; Sune Larsson; Hans Mallmin
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Functional interface micromechanics of 11 en-bloc retrieved cemented femoral hip replacements.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; Mark A Miller; Nico Verdonschot; Timothy H Izant; Amos Race
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  The effect of abductor muscle and anterior-posterior hip contact load simulation on the in-vitro primary stability of a cementless hip stem.

Authors:  Youngbae Park; Carolyne Albert; Yong-San Yoon; Göran Fernlund; Hanspeter Frei; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.