Literature DB >> 23337427

Size doesn't matter: cortical stroke lesion volume is not associated with upper extremity motor impairment and function in mild, chronic hemiparesis.

Stephen J Page1, Lynne V Gauthier, Susan White.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine (1) the relationship between lesion volume and upper extremity (UE) motor impairment using the UE section of the Fugl-Meyer (FM) assessment; and (2) the relationship between lesion volume and UE functional outcomes using the Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT) Functional Ability (FA) and Time scales.
DESIGN: Secondary retrospective analysis of randomized controlled trial data.
SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects with chronic stroke (N=139, 83 men; mean age ± SD of all subjects, 56.7±11.2y; mean time ± SD since stroke onset, 59.6±65.6mo; 90 subjects with right hemiparesis) and stable, active, distal UE movement. INTERVENTION: Data were collected related to subjects' lesion volume and UE movement before their participation in a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FM and AMAT.
RESULTS: Neither age nor lesion volume was related to FM performance. The P value for the regression coefficient of lesion volume was .045 in the AMAT FA model and .016 in the AMAT Time model. Lesion volume accounted for only an additional 1.7% (AMAT FA) to 3.1% (AMAT Time) of the variability in motor function and was not clinically meaningful.
CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest no relationship between lesion volume and UE impairment, and a small, clinically insignificant relationship between lesion volume and UE motor function. Stroke causes metabolic changes in intact regions and diffuse structural loss in anatomically remote regions from the infarction. These other factors may account for variance in motor outcomes after stroke.
Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23337427      PMCID: PMC3733358          DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  31 in total

1.  Voxel-guided morphometry ("VGM") and application to stroke.

Authors:  Thorsten Schormann; Matthias Kraemer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Identification of critical areas for motor function recovery in chronic stroke subjects using voxel-based lesion symptom mapping.

Authors:  Ryan Lo; Darren Gitelman; Robert Levy; Justin Hulvershorn; Todd Parrish
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Measures of brain morphology and infarction in the framingham heart study: establishing what is normal.

Authors:  Charles DeCarli; Joseph Massaro; Danielle Harvey; John Hald; Mats Tullberg; Rhoda Au; Alexa Beiser; Ralph D'Agostino; Philip A Wolf
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  Implicit and explicit memory after focal thalamic lesions.

Authors:  C Exner; G Weniger; E Irle
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Posterior thalamic hemorrhage induces "pusher syndrome".

Authors:  Hans-Otto Karnath; Leif Johannsen; Doris Broetz; Wilhelm Küker
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  The role of diaschisis in stroke recovery.

Authors:  R J Seitz; N P Azari; U Knorr; F Binkofski; H Herzog; H J Freund
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Motor recovery after stroke. Morphological and functional brain alterations.

Authors:  P Pantano; R Formisano; M Ricci; V Di Piero; U Sabatini; B Di Pofi; R Rossi; L Bozzao; G L Lenzi
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Atrophy of spared gray matter tissue predicts poorer motor recovery and rehabilitation response in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Lynne V Gauthier; Edward Taub; Victor W Mark; Ameen Barghi; Gitendra Uswatte
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Design for the everest randomized trial of cortical stimulation and rehabilitation for arm function following stroke.

Authors:  Richard L Harvey; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: lesion size by computed tomography.

Authors:  T Brott; J R Marler; C P Olinger; H P Adams; T Tomsick; W G Barsan; J Biller; R Eberle; V Hertzberg; M Walker
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  15 in total

1.  Poststroke Impairment and Recovery Are Predicted by Task-Specific Regionalization of Injury.

Authors:  Matthew S Jeffers; Boris Touvykine; Allyson Ripley; Gillian Lahey; Anthony Carter; Numa Dancause; Dale Corbett
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Long term motor function after neonatal stroke: Lesion localization above all.

Authors:  Mickael Dinomais; Lucie Hertz-Pannier; Samuel Groeschel; Stéphane Chabrier; Matthieu Delion; Béatrice Husson; Manoelle Kossorotoff; Cyrille Renaud; Sylvie Nguyen The Tich
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Quantitative microstructural deficits in chronic phase of stroke with small volume infarcts: A diffusion tensor 3-D tractographic analysis.

Authors:  Prachi Dubey; Vasileios-Arsenios Lioutas; Rafeeque Bhadelia; Brad Manor; Peter Novak; Magdy Selim; Vera Novak
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 4.  A new neuroinformatics approach to personalized medicine in neurology: The Virtual Brain.

Authors:  Maria I Falcon; Viktor Jirsa; Ana Solodkin
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.710

5.  Cortical disconnection of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex is associated with gait speed and upper extremity motor impairment in chronic left hemispheric stroke.

Authors:  Denise M Peters; Julius Fridriksson; Jill C Stewart; Jessica D Richardson; Chris Rorden; Leonardo Bonilha; Addie Middleton; Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht; Stacy L Fritz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Of mice and men: modelling post-stroke depression experimentally.

Authors:  G Kronenberg; K Gertz; A Heinz; M Endres
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Patterns of motor recovery and structural neuroplasticity after basal ganglia infarcts.

Authors:  Hesheng Liu; Xiaolong Peng; Louisa Dahmani; Hongfeng Wang; Miao Zhang; Yi Shan; Dongdong Rong; Yanjun Guo; Junchao Li; Nianlin Li; Long Wang; Yuanxiang Lin; Ruiqi Pan; Jie Lu; Danhong Wang
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 8.  The neuroanatomical-functional paradox in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Karim Fouad; Phillip G Popovich; Marcel A Kopp; Jan M Schwab
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 44.711

9.  Virtual reality for the rehabilitation of the upper limb motor function after stroke: a prospective controlled trial.

Authors:  Andrea Turolla; Mauro Dam; Laura Ventura; Paolo Tonin; Michela Agostini; Carla Zucconi; Pawel Kiper; Annachiara Cagnin; Lamberto Piron
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  tDCS and Robotics on Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: Effect Modification by Stroke Duration and Type of Stroke.

Authors:  Sofia Straudi; Felipe Fregni; Carlotta Martinuzzi; Claudia Pavarelli; Stefano Salvioli; Nino Basaglia
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.