Literature DB >> 18812431

Design for the everest randomized trial of cortical stimulation and rehabilitation for arm function following stroke.

Richard L Harvey1, Carolee J Winstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cortical stimulation (CS) combined with rehabilitation may improve upper limb motor function after stroke.
OBJECTIVE: Describe the study design for the Everest Clinical Trial, a randomized single-blinded pivotal device trial, testing safety and efficacy of epidural CS delivered during rehabilitation for upper limb motor function in patients with ischemic stroke.
METHOD: A total of 174 participants from 21 centers with hemiplegia at least 4 months after acute ischemic stroke are randomized in a 2:1 ratio to investigational or control groups. Investigational patients undergo implantation of cortical electrode and pulse generator and receive 6 weeks of upper limb rehabilitation with subthreshold CS delivered only during therapy. Control group patients receive the same therapy without device implantation or stimulation. Primary outcome measures include the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) score and the arm motor ability test (AMAT) measured at baseline and 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks following rehabilitation treatment with primary endpoint at 4 weeks following treatment. A successful outcome is defined as an improvement in UEFM of at least 4.5 points and in AMAT of at least 0.21 points from baseline to primary endpoint. A 20% better success rate between investigational and control groups will be considered clinically meaningful. Adverse events occurring during the study will be identified.
RESULTS: Not applicable.
CONCLUSIONS: The Everest Clinical Trial is the first randomized pivotal trial on the safety and efficacy of direct CS delivered during rehabilitation for recovery of upper limb motor function in patients with ischemic stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18812431     DOI: 10.1177/1545968308317532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  29 in total

Review 1.  In vitro and in vivo neuronal electrotaxis: a potential mechanism for restoration?

Authors:  Ali Jahanshahi; Lisa-Maria Schönfeld; Evi Lemmens; Sven Hendrix; Yasin Temel
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Anatomy and physiology predict response to motor cortex stimulation after stroke.

Authors:  Sarvenaz Nouri; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Chronic deep cerebellar stimulation promotes long-term potentiation, microstructural plasticity, and reorganization of perilesional cortical representation in a rodent model.

Authors:  Jessica Cooperrider; Havan Furmaga; Ela Plow; Hyun-Joo Park; Zhihong Chen; Grahame Kidd; Kenneth B Baker; John T Gale; Andre G Machado
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Novel Stroke Therapeutics: Unraveling Stroke Pathophysiology and Its Impact on Clinical Treatments.

Authors:  Paul M George; Gary K Steinberg
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado; Corin Bonnett; Daniel Janini; Sarah Roelle; Kelsey Potter-Baker; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Xiaofeng Wang; Guang Yue; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 6.  The promise of mHealth: daily activity monitoring and outcome assessments by wearable sensors.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; Andrew Dorsch
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Rethinking stimulation of the brain in stroke rehabilitation: why higher motor areas might be better alternatives for patients with greater impairments.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 7.519

8.  Can cortical stimulation of inferior frontal cortex enhance proactive control?

Authors:  Vanessa M Johnen; Ethan R Buch; Franz-Xaver Neubert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Neurorestoration after stroke.

Authors:  Tej D Azad; Anand Veeravagu; Gary K Steinberg
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 10.  Stem cells as an emerging paradigm in stroke 3: enhancing the development of clinical trials.

Authors:  Sean I Savitz; Steven C Cramer; Lawrence Wechsler
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.