Literature DB >> 23331328

International guidelines for the in vivo assessment of skin properties in non-clinical settings: Part 2. transepidermal water loss and skin hydration.

Johan du Plessis1, Aleksandr Stefaniak, Fritz Eloff, Swen John, Tove Agner, Tzu-Chieh Chou, Rosemary Nixon, Markus Steiner, Anja Franken, Irena Kudla, Linn Holness.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an emerging perspective that it is not sufficient to just assess skin exposure to physical and chemical stressors in workplaces, but that it is also important to assess the condition, i.e. skin barrier function of the exposed skin at the time of exposure. The workplace environment, representing a non-clinical environment, can be highly variable and difficult to control, thereby presenting unique measurement challenges not typically encountered in clinical settings.
METHODS: An expert working group convened a workshop as part of the 5th International Conference on Occupational and Environmental Exposure of Skin to Chemicals (OEESC) to develop basic guidelines and best practices (based on existing clinical guidelines, published data, and own experiences) for the in vivo measurement of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin hydration in non-clinical settings with specific reference to the workplace as a worst-case scenario.
RESULTS: Key elements of these guidelines are: (i) to minimize or recognize, to the extent feasible, the influences of relevant endogenous-, exogenous-, environmental- and measurement/instrumentation-related factors; (ii) to measure TEWL with a closed-chamber type instrument; (iii) report results as a difference or percent change (rather than absolute values); and (iv) accurately report any notable deviations from this guidelines.
CONCLUSION: It is anticipated that these guidelines will promote consistent data reporting, which will facilitate inter-comparison of study results.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  guideline; non-clinical; skin barrier; skin hydration; stratum corneum; transepidermal water loss

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23331328      PMCID: PMC4522909          DOI: 10.1111/srt.12037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skin Res Technol        ISSN: 0909-752X            Impact factor:   2.365


  81 in total

1.  Analysis of circadian and ultradian rhythms of skin surface properties of face and forearm of healthy women.

Authors:  I Le Fur; A Reinberg; S Lopez; F Morizot; M Mechkouri; E Tschachler
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 8.551

2.  Non-invasive bioengineering methods in an intervention study in 1020 male metal workers: results and implications for occupational dermatology.

Authors:  Birgitta Kütting; Wolfgang Uter; Thomas Baumeister; Barbara Schaller; Wobbeke Weistenhöfer; Hans Drexler
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Skin aging. Effect on transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, skin surface pH, and casual sebum content.

Authors:  K P Wilhelm; A B Cua; H I Maibach
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1991-12

4.  Closed-chamber transepidermal water loss measurement: microclimate, calibration and performance.

Authors:  R E Imhof; M E P De Jesus; P Xiao; L I Ciortea; E P Berg
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 2.970

5.  Differences in stratum corneum pH gradient when comparing white Caucasian and black African-American skin.

Authors:  E Berardesca; F Pirot; M Singh; H Maibach
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.302

6.  International guidelines for the in vivo assessment of skin properties in non-clinical settings: Part 2. transepidermal water loss and skin hydration.

Authors:  Johan du Plessis; Aleksandr Stefaniak; Fritz Eloff; Swen John; Tove Agner; Tzu-Chieh Chou; Rosemary Nixon; Markus Steiner; Anja Franken; Irena Kudla; Linn Holness
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Individual and instrumental variations in irritant patch-test reactions--clinical evaluation and quantification by bioengineering methods.

Authors:  T Agner; J Serup
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.470

8.  Skin reactions to irritants assessed by non-invasive bioengineering methods.

Authors:  T Agner; J Serup
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Full-body skin mapping for six biophysical parameters: baseline values at 16 anatomical sites in 125 human subjects.

Authors:  P Kleesz; R Darlenski; J W Fluhr
Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.479

10.  Is occupational irritant contact dermatitis predictable by cutaneous bioengineering methods? Results of the Swiss Metalworkers' Eczema Study (PROMETES).

Authors:  U Berndt; U Hinnen; D Iliev; P Elsner
Journal:  Dermatology       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.366

View more
  33 in total

1.  International guidelines for the in vivo assessment of skin properties in non-clinical settings: Part 2. transepidermal water loss and skin hydration.

Authors:  Johan du Plessis; Aleksandr Stefaniak; Fritz Eloff; Swen John; Tove Agner; Tzu-Chieh Chou; Rosemary Nixon; Markus Steiner; Anja Franken; Irena Kudla; Linn Holness
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  Hygiene and emollient interventions for maintaining skin integrity in older people in hospital and residential care settings.

Authors:  Fiona Cowdell; Yuri T Jadotte; Steven J Ersser; Simon Danby; Sandra Lawton; Amanda Roberts; Judith Dyson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-23

3.  Measurement of morphological and physiological skin properties in aged care residents: a test-retest reliability pilot study.

Authors:  Robyn Rayner; Keryln Carville; Gavin Leslie; Satvinder S Dhaliwal
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Ferromagnetic, folded electrode composite as a soft interface to the skin for long-term electrophysiological recording.

Authors:  Kyung-In Jang; Han Na Jung; Jung Woo Lee; Sheng Xu; Yu Hao Liu; Yinji Ma; Jae-Woong Jeong; Young Min Song; Jeonghyun Kim; Bong Hun Kim; Anthony Banks; Jean Won Kwak; Yiyuan Yang; Dawei Shi; Zijun Wei; Xue Feng; Ungyu Paik; Yonggang Huang; Roozbeh Ghaffari; John A Rogers
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 18.808

5.  An Exploratory Study of the Effects of the pH of Synthetic Urine on Skin Integrity in Healthy Participants.

Authors:  Sofoklis Koudounas; Dan L Bader; David Voegeli
Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.014

6.  VISIA Skin Analysis System as a Tool to Evaluate the Reduction of Pigmented Skin and Vascular Lesions Using the 532 Nm Laser.

Authors:  Piotr Zawodny; Elżbieta Stój; Piotr Kulig; Karolina Skonieczna-Żydecka; Jerzy Sieńko
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2022-10-14

7.  p120-catenin is required for regulating epidermal proliferation, differentiation, and barrier function.

Authors:  Zhongjian Xie; Yuanyuan Tang; Mao-Qiang Man; Chandrama Shrestha; Daniel D Bikle
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 8.  Reframing racial and ethnic disparities in atopic dermatitis in Black and Latinx populations.

Authors:  Emily A Croce; Moise L Levy; Adewole S Adamson; Elizabeth C Matsui
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  International guidelines for the in vivo assessment of skin properties in non-clinical settings: part 1. pH.

Authors:  Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Johan du Plessis; Swen M John; Fritz Eloff; Tove Agner; Tzu-Chieh Chou; Rosemary Nixon; Markus F C Steiner; Irena Kudla; D Linn Holness
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 10.  Claimed Effects, Outcome Variables and Methods of Measurement for Health Claims Proposed Under European Community Regulation 1924/2006 in the Framework of Maintenance of Skin Function.

Authors:  Daniela Martini; Donato Angelino; Chiara Cortelazzi; Ivana Zavaroni; Giorgio Bedogni; Marilena Musci; Carlo Pruneti; Giovanni Passeri; Marco Ventura; Daniela Galli; Prisco Mirandola; Marco Vitale; Alessandra Dei Cas; Riccardo C Bonadonna; Sergio Di Nuzzo; Maria Beatrice De Felici; Daniele Del Rio
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.