Literature DB >> 19175433

Closed-chamber transepidermal water loss measurement: microclimate, calibration and performance.

R E Imhof1, M E P De Jesus, P Xiao, L I Ciortea, E P Berg.   

Abstract

The importance of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) as a measure of the skin barrier is well recognized. Currently, the open-chamber method is dominant, but it is increasingly challenged by newer closed-chamber technologies. Whilst there is familiarity with open-chamber characteristics, there is uncertainty about the capabilities of the challengers. The main issues are related to how microclimate affects TEWL measurements. The aim of this paper is to provide a framework for understanding the effects of microclimate on TEWL measurement. Part of the problem is that TEWL measurement is indirect. TEWL is the diffusion of condensed water through the stratum corneum (SC), whereas TEWL methods measure water vapour flux in the air above the SC. This vapour flux depends on (i) the rate of supply of water to the skin surface and (ii) the rate of evaporation of water from the skin surface. Rate (i) is a skin property (TEWL), rate (ii) is a microclimate property. The controlling rate for the combined process is the lower of the above two rates. Therefore, TEWL instruments measure TEWL only when TEWL is the rate-limiting process. Another problem is that SC barrier property and SC hydration are affected by the microclimate adjacent to the skin surface. This is discussed insofar as it affects the measurement of TEWL. The conclusion is that such changes occur on a timescale that is long compared with TEWL measurement times. An important aspect of TEWL measurement is calibration. We present an analysis of the traditional wet-cup method and a new droplet method that is traceable and has been independently verified by a standards laboratory. Finally, we review performance indicators of commercial closed-chamber instruments with reference to open-chamber instruments. The main findings are that TEWL readings correlate well, but there are significant differences in the other aspects of performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19175433     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2008.00476.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci        ISSN: 0142-5463            Impact factor:   2.970


  24 in total

1.  Evidence for the major contribution of evaporation to tear film thinning between blinks.

Authors:  Samuel H Kimball; P Ewen King-Smith; Jason J Nichols
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  A Detailed Protocol for Perspiration Monitoring Using a Novel, Small, Wireless Device.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Ogai; Masakazu Fukuoka; Kei-Ichiro Kitamura; Kiyoshi Uchide; Tetsu Nemoto
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  International guidelines for the in vivo assessment of skin properties in non-clinical settings: Part 2. transepidermal water loss and skin hydration.

Authors:  Johan du Plessis; Aleksandr Stefaniak; Fritz Eloff; Swen John; Tove Agner; Tzu-Chieh Chou; Rosemary Nixon; Markus Steiner; Anja Franken; Irena Kudla; Linn Holness
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  An Exploratory Study of the Effects of the pH of Synthetic Urine on Skin Integrity in Healthy Participants.

Authors:  Sofoklis Koudounas; Dan L Bader; David Voegeli
Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.014

5.  Effect of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin in fluid and semi-solid submicron emulsions on physiological skin parameters during regular in vivo application.

Authors:  Astrid Pany; Marie Wohlgenannt; Safoura Klopprogge; Michael Wolzt; Thomas Heuser; Harald Kotisch; Claudia Valenta; Victoria Klang
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.970

6.  Increased insensible water loss contributes to aging related dehydration.

Authors:  Natalia I Dmitrieva; Maurice B Burg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Wearable Sweat Rate Sensors for Human Thermal Comfort Monitoring.

Authors:  Jai Kyoung Sim; Sunghyun Yoon; Young-Ho Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Atopic Dermatitis-like Graft-versus-host Disease and Lichen Planus-like Graft-versus-host Disease: Alterations in Skin Barrier Function and Related Molecules.

Authors:  Kun Li; Zhang-Lei Mu; Xue Chen; Guang-Dong Wen; Yan Zhao; Jian-Zhong Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 9.  Management of Moisture-Associated Skin Damage: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kevin Y Woo; Dimitri Beeckman; Debashish Chakravarthy
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.347

10.  Characterization and validation of an in vivo confocal Raman spectroscopy led tri-method approach in the evaluation of the lip barrier.

Authors:  Stephan Bielfeldt; Sabrina Laing; Tomasz Sadowski; Hemali Gunt; Klaus-Peter Wilhelm
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.