Literature DB >> 14718704

Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements.

M Kobayashi1, S Hutchinson, H Théoret, G Schlaug, A Pascual-Leone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disruption of cortical function can improve behavior. Motor cortex (M1) transcallosal interactions are mainly inhibitory; after unilateral damage to M1, there is increased excitability of the unaffected M1. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of M1 produces a temporary reduction in cortical excitability in the same M1 that outlasts the duration of the rTMS train. The authors hypothesize that reducing cortical excitability of M1 by rTMS may improve motor performance in the ipsilateral hand by releasing the contralateral M1 from transcallosal inhibition.
METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers participated. Using a sequential key-pressing task with the index finger, motor performance was monitored before and after rTMS (1 Hz for 10 minutes with the intensity below motor threshold) applied to the ipsilateral M1, contralateral M1, ipsilateral premotor area, or vertex (Cz).
RESULTS: rTMS of M1 shortened execution time of the motor task with the ipsilateral hand without affecting performance with the contralateral hand. This effect outlasted rTMS by at least 10 minutes, was specific for M1 stimulation, and was associated with increased intracortical excitability in the unstimulated M1.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results support the concept of an interhemispheric "rivalry." They demonstrate the utility of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to explore the functional facilitation of the unstimulated counterpart motor cortex, presumably via suppression of activity in the stimulated motor cortex and transcallosal inhibition.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14718704     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.62.1.91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  88 in total

1.  Differential impact of continuous theta-burst stimulation over left and right DLPFC on planning.

Authors:  Christoph P Kaller; Katharina Heinze; Annekathrein Frenkel; Claus H Läppchen; Josef M Unterrainer; Cornelius Weiller; Rüdiger Lange; Benjamin Rahm
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the prediction and enhancement of rehabilitation treatment effects.

Authors:  Michelle Harris-Love
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  Low frequency rTMS effects on sensorimotor synchronization.

Authors:  Michail Doumas; Peter Praamstra; Alan M Wing
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Paired-pulse rTMS at trans-synaptic intervals increases corticomotor excitability and reduces the rate of force loss during a fatiguing exercise of the hand.

Authors:  Nicola M Benwell; Frank L Mastaglia; Gary W Thickbroom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Transient functional suppression and facilitation of Japanese ideogram writing induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of posterior inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Yoshino Ueki; Tatsuya Mima; Kimihiro Nakamura; Tatsuhide Oga; Hiroshi Shibasaki; Takashi Nagamine; Hidenao Fukuyama
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Combined statistical analysis method assessing fast versus slow movement training in a patient with cerebellar stroke: a single-case study.

Authors:  Huiqiong Deng; Teresa J Kimberley; William K Durfee; Brittany L Dressler; Carie Steil; James R Carey
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-01-17

7.  Brain-machine interfaces and transcranial stimulation: future implications for directing functional movement and improving function after spinal injury in humans.

Authors:  Jose M Carmena; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2012

8.  Imaging correlates of motor recovery from cerebral infarction and their physiological significance in well-recovered patients.

Authors:  Dinesh G Nair; Siobhan Hutchinson; Felipe Fregni; Michael Alexander; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Neural interface technology for rehabilitation: exploiting and promoting neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jennifer L Collinger; Monica A Perez; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer; Steven W Brose; Andrew B Schwartz; Michael L Boninger; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.784

10.  Enhanced motor function and its neurophysiological correlates after navigated low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex in stroke.

Authors:  Shahid Bashir; Marine Vernet; Umer Najib; Jennifer Perez; Miguel Alonso-Alonso; Mark Knobel; Woo-Kyoung Yoo; Dylan Edwards; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.