Literature DB >> 20005962

Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.

Christian Grefkes1, Dennis A Nowak, Ling E Wang, Manuel Dafotakis, Simon B Eickhoff, Gereon R Fink.   

Abstract

Data derived from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies suggest that transcallosal inhibition mechanisms between the primary motor cortex of both hemispheres may contribute to the reduced motor performance of stroke patients. We here investigated the potential of modulating pathological interactions between cortical motor areas by means of repetitive TMS using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and dynamic causal modeling (DCM). Eleven subacute stroke patients were scanned 1-3 months after symptom onset while performing whole hand fist closure movements. After a baseline scan, patients were stimulated with inhibitory 1-Hz rTMS applied over two different locations: (i) vertex (control stimulation) and (ii) primary motor cortex (M1) of the unaffected (contralesional) hemisphere. Changes in the endogenous and task-dependent effective connectivity were assessed by DCM of a bilateral network comprising M1, lateral premotor cortex, and the supplementary motor area (SMA). The results showed that rTMS applied over contralesional M1 significantly improved the motor performance of the paretic hand. The connectivity analysis revealed that the behavioral improvements were significantly correlated with a reduction of the negative influences originating from contralesional M1 during paretic hand movements. Concurrently, endogenous coupling between ipsilesional SMA and M1 was significantly enhanced only after rTMS applied over contralesional M1. Therefore, rTMS applied over contralesional M1 may be used to transiently remodel the disturbed functional network architecture of the motor system. The connectivity analyses suggest that both a reduction of pathological transcallosal influences (originating from contralesional M1) and a restitution of ipsilesional effective connectivity between SMA and M1 underlie improved motor performance. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20005962      PMCID: PMC8020334          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  62 in total

1.  Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial.

Authors:  G Kwakkel; B J Kollen; R C Wagenaar
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation.

Authors:  A Feydy; R Carlier; A Roby-Brami; B Bussel; F Cazalis; L Pierot; Y Burnod; M A Maier
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Motor areas in the frontal lobe of the primate.

Authors:  Richard P Dum; Peter L Strick
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2002-12

Review 4.  Functional-anatomical concepts of human premotor cortex: evidence from fMRI and PET studies.

Authors:  Ricarda I Schubotz; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Friedhelm Hummel; Pablo Celnik; Nagako Murase; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research.

Authors:  R C Lyle
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.479

7.  Bi-hemispheric contribution to functional motor recovery of the affected forelimb following focal ischemic brain injury in rats.

Authors:  Jeff Biernaskie; Aleksandra Szymanska; Victoria Windle; Dale Corbett
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Corticocortical connections of area F3 (SMA-proper) and area F6 (pre-SMA) in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  G Luppino; M Matelli; R Camarda; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  F Chollet; V DiPiero; R J Wise; D J Brooks; R J Dolan; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 10.  Does brain stimulation after stroke have a future?

Authors:  Penelope Talelli; John Rothwell
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.710

View more
  126 in total

1.  Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke.

Authors:  Lynley V Bradnam; Cathy M Stinear; P Alan Barber; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Noninvasive associative plasticity induction in a corticocortical pathway of the human brain.

Authors:  Ethan R Buch; Vanessa M Johnen; Natalie Nelissen; Jacinta O'Shea; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Test-retest reliability of effective connectivity in the face perception network.

Authors:  Stefan Frässle; Frieder Michel Paulus; Sören Krach; Andreas Jansen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Lasting modulation effects of rTMS on neural activity and connectivity as revealed by resting-state EEG.

Authors:  Lei Ding; Guofa Shou; Han Yuan; Diamond Urbano; Yoon-Hee Cha
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Bidirectional effects on interhemispheric resting-state functional connectivity induced by excitatory and inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Takamitsu Watanabe; Ritsuko Hanajima; Yuichiro Shirota; Shinya Ohminami; Ryosuke Tsutsumi; Yasuo Terao; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Satoshi Hirose; Yasushi Miyashita; Seiki Konishi; Akira Kunimatsu; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Combined statistical analysis method assessing fast versus slow movement training in a patient with cerebellar stroke: a single-case study.

Authors:  Huiqiong Deng; Teresa J Kimberley; William K Durfee; Brittany L Dressler; Carie Steil; James R Carey
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-01-17

Review 7.  Cerebral network disorders after stroke: evidence from imaging-based connectivity analyses of active and resting brain states in humans.

Authors:  Anne K Rehme; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Interleaving Motor Sequence Training With High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Facilitates Consolidation.

Authors:  Jost-Julian Rumpf; Luca May; Christopher Fricke; Joseph Classen; Gesa Hartwigsen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Phase Synchronicity of μ-Rhythm Determines Efficacy of Interhemispheric Communication Between Human Motor Cortices.

Authors:  Maria-Ioanna Stefanou; Debora Desideri; Paolo Belardinelli; Christoph Zrenner; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Static field influences on transcranial magnetic stimulation: considerations for TMS in the scanner environment.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Reza Jalinous; Gabriela L Cantarero; John E Desmond
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.