Christopher C Imes1, Frances Marcus Lewis. 1. Christopher C. Imes, PhD Postdoctoral Fellow, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Frances Marcus Lewis, PhD, FAAN Professor, Family and Child Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: More than 82 million Americans have 1 or more forms of cardiovascular disease (CVD), accounting for 32.8% of all deaths in the United States. Although the evidence for the familial aggregation of CVD is strong, the relationship between family history (FH) of CVD, perceived risk for CVD, and health-related behavior is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article was to review and summarize the published research on the relationship between an FH of CVD, an individual's perceived risk, and health-related behavior to make recommendations for clinical practice and future research. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and PsycINFO to identify articles that examined the relationship between an FH of CVD, perceived CVD risk, and health-promoting behaviors. A total of 263 unique articles were reviewed. A total of 238 were excluded, resulting in a total of 25 articles included in the review. RESULTS: There was a positive relationship between a reported FH of CVD and perceived risk. However, the relationship between an FH of CVD and health-related behavior change and perceived risk and behavior change was inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: A person's awareness of his or her FH of CVD or his or her own risk for CVD is not a sufficient predictor of changes in his or her health-related behavior. Future studies are needed to better explain the processes by which perceived CVD risk or FH of CVD can be used to affect health-related behavior changes. It appears that both FH and perceived personal risk for CVD are necessary but not sufficient conditions to change health-related behavior in high-risk populations. Future studies should also test interventions that help individuals with an FH of CVD attribute increased personal risk to themselves for developing CVD, while providing lifestyle management options to minimize their risk.
BACKGROUND: More than 82 million Americans have 1 or more forms of cardiovascular disease (CVD), accounting for 32.8% of all deaths in the United States. Although the evidence for the familial aggregation of CVD is strong, the relationship between family history (FH) of CVD, perceived risk for CVD, and health-related behavior is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article was to review and summarize the published research on the relationship between an FH of CVD, an individual's perceived risk, and health-related behavior to make recommendations for clinical practice and future research. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and PsycINFO to identify articles that examined the relationship between an FH of CVD, perceived CVD risk, and health-promoting behaviors. A total of 263 unique articles were reviewed. A total of 238 were excluded, resulting in a total of 25 articles included in the review. RESULTS: There was a positive relationship between a reported FH of CVD and perceived risk. However, the relationship between an FH of CVD and health-related behavior change and perceived risk and behavior change was inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: A person's awareness of his or her FH of CVD or his or her own risk for CVD is not a sufficient predictor of changes in his or her health-related behavior. Future studies are needed to better explain the processes by which perceived CVD risk or FH of CVD can be used to affect health-related behavior changes. It appears that both FH and perceived personal risk for CVD are necessary but not sufficient conditions to change health-related behavior in high-risk populations. Future studies should also test interventions that help individuals with an FH of CVD attribute increased personal risk to themselves for developing CVD, while providing lifestyle management options to minimize their risk.
Authors: Kevin E Kip; Heather E McCreath; Jeffrey M Roseman; Steven B Hulley; Pamela J Schreiner Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Y Friedlander; P Arbogast; S M Schwartz; S M Marcovina; M A Austin; F R Rosendaal; A P Reiner; B M Psaty; D S Siscovick Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Mahesh J Patel; James A de Lemos; Binu Philips; Sabina A Murphy; Patrice C Vaeth; Darren K McGuire; Amit Khera Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Elizabeth C Prom-Wormley; James S Clifford; Jessica L Bourdon; Peter Barr; Courtney Blondino; Kevin M Ball; Joshua Montgomery; Jonathan K Davis; Joseph E Real; Alexis C Edwards; Dawn L Thiselton; Gwen Corley Creighton; De'Nisha Wilson; Cynthia Newbille Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Lin Li; Zheng Chang; Jiangwei Sun; Miguel Garcia-Argibay; Ebba Du Rietz; Maja Dobrosavljevic; Isabell Brikell; Tomas Jernberg; Marco Solmi; Samuele Cortese; Henrik Larsson Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2022-10 Impact factor: 79.683
Authors: Dawn M Aycock; Kenya D Kirkendoll; Kisha C Coleman; Patricia C Clark; Karen C Albright; Anne W Alexandrov Journal: J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2015 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.083