Literature DB >> 21041707

Comorbidity and mortality results from a randomized prostate cancer screening trial.

E David Crawford1, Robert Grubb, Amanda Black, Gerald L Andriole, Ming-Hui Chen, Grant Izmirlian, Christine D Berg, Anthony V D'Amico.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Estimates of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) were similar for men randomly assigned to intervention compared with usual care on the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian PC screening study. However, results analyzed by comorbidity strata remain unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1993 and 2001, of 76,693 men who were randomly assigned to usual care or intervention at 10 US centers, 73,378 (96%) completed a questionnaire that inquired about comorbidity and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing before random assignment. Fine and Gray's multivariable analysis was performed to assess whether the randomized screening arm was associated with the risk of PCSM in men with no or minimal versus at least one significant comorbidity, adjusting for age and prerandomization PSA testing.
RESULTS: After 10 years of follow-up, 9,565 deaths occurred, 164 from PC. A significant decrease in the risk of PCSM (22 v 38 deaths; adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.95; P = .03) was observed in men with no or minimal comorbidity randomly assigned to intervention versus usual care, and the additional number needed to treat to prevent one PC death at 10 years was five. Among men with at least one significant comorbidity, those randomly assigned to intervention versus usual care did not have a decreased risk of PCSM (62 v 42 deaths; AHR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.96 to 2.11; P = .08).
CONCLUSION: Selective use of PSA screening for men in good health appears to reduce the risk of PCSM with minimal overtreatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21041707      PMCID: PMC3058283          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.5979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  15 in total

1.  Healthy screened bias in epidemiologic studies of cancer incidence.

Authors:  N S Weiss; M A Rossing
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Jonas Hugosson; Sigrid Carlsson; Gunnar Aus; Svante Bergdahl; Ali Khatami; Pär Lodding; Carl-Gustaf Pihl; Johan Stranne; Erik Holmberg; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Antonio Berenguer; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Bert G Blijenberg; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Edward P Gelmann; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Richard B Hayes; Barnett S Kramer; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Preoperative PSA velocity and the risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico; Ming-Hui Chen; Kimberly A Roehl; William J Catalona
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Clinical significance and treatment of biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wilmer B Roberts; Misop Han
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 3.279

7.  Does treatment duration affect outcome after radiotherapy for prostate cancer?

Authors:  David J D'Ambrosio; Tianyu Li; Eric M Horwitz; David Y T Chen; Alan Pollack; Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Risk of dying from prostate cancer in men randomized to screening: differences between attendees and nonattendees.

Authors:  Anna Grenabo Bergdahl; Gunnar Aus; Hans Lilja; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Major 30-day complications after radical radiotherapy: a population-based analysis and comparison with surgery.

Authors:  Shabbir M H Alibhai; Marc Leach; Padraig Warde
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Calculation of NNTs in RCTs with time-to-event outcomes: a literature review.

Authors:  Mandy Hildebrandt; Elke Vervölgyi; Ralf Bender
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  47 in total

1.  L'USPSTF et la FDA: l'APS et les I5AR.

Authors:  Laurence H Klotz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Furthering the prostate cancer screening debate (prostate cancer specific mortality and associated risks).

Authors:  G Michael Allan; Michael P Chetner; Bryan J Donnelly; Neil A Hagen; David Ross; J Dean Ruether; Peter Venner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  USPSTF and FDA: PSA and 5ARIs.

Authors:  Laurence H Klotz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Prostate-specific antigen screening can be beneficial to younger and at-risk men.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Chris H Bangma; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  PURLs: PSA testing: when it's useful, when it's not.

Authors:  Susan Slatkoff; Stephen Gamboa; Adam J Zolotor; Anne L Mounsey; Kohar Jones
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 6.  Cancer Screening in the Elderly: A Review of Breast, Colorectal, Lung, and Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Ashwin A Kotwal; Mara A Schonberg
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

7.  Incidence, risk factors, and reasons for hospitalization among glioblastoma patients receiving chemoradiation.

Authors:  Rifaquat Rahman; Paul J Catalano; David A Reardon; Andrew D Norden; Patrick Y Wen; Eudocia Q Lee; Lakshmi Nayak; Rameen Beroukhim; Ian F Dunn; Alexandra J Golby; Mark D Johnson; E Antonio Chiocca; Elizabeth B Claus; Brian M Alexander; Nils D Arvold
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Update of randomized trials for prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Annelies Vellekoop; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

9.  Don't test -- don't treat: the new paradigm for the treatment of prostate cancer?

Authors:  Justin M Albani
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec

10.  Comparative effectiveness of alternative prostate-specific antigen--based prostate cancer screening strategies: model estimates of potential benefits and harms.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; John L Gore; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.