Literature DB >> 27158428

Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance.

Larissa J Vos1, Michele Janoski1, Keith Wachowicz1, Atiyah Yahya1, Oleksandr Boychak1, John Amanie1, Nadeem Pervez1, Matthew B Parliament1, Edith Pituskin1, B Gino Fallone1, Nawaid Usmani1.   

Abstract

AIM: To examine whether addition of 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to an active surveillance protocol could detect aggressive or progressive prostate cancer.
METHODS: Twenty-three patients with low risk disease were enrolled on this active surveillance study, all of which had Gleason score 6 or less disease. All patients had clinical assessments, including digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing, every 6 mo with annual 3T mpMRI scans with gadolinium contrast and minimum sextant prostate biopsies. The MRI images were anonymized of patient identifiers and clinical information and each scan underwent radiological review without the other results known. Descriptive statistics for demographics and follow-up as well as the sensitivity and specificity of mpMRI to identify prostate cancer and progressive disease were calculated.
RESULTS: During follow-up (median 24.8 mo) 11 of 23 patients with low-risk prostate cancer had disease progression and were taken off study to receive definitive treatment. Disease progression was identified through upstaging of Gleason score on subsequent biopsies for all 11 patients with only 2 patients also having a PSA doubling time of less than 2 years. All 23 patients had biopsy confirmed prostate cancer but only 10 had a positive index of suspicion on mpMRI scans at baseline (43.5% sensitivity). Aggressive disease prediction from baseline mpMRI scans had satisfactory specificity (81.8%) but low sensitivity (58.3%). Twenty-two patients had serial mpMRI scans and evidence of disease progression was seen for 3 patients all of whom had upstaging of Gleason score on biopsy (30% specificity and 100% sensitivity).
CONCLUSION: Addition of mpMRI imaging in active surveillance decision making may help in identifying aggressive disease amongst men with indolent prostate cancer earlier than traditional methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Indolent disease; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Treatment triaging

Year:  2016        PMID: 27158428      PMCID: PMC4840199          DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i4.410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Radiol        ISSN: 1949-8470


  31 in total

Review 1.  Prostate MR imaging at high-field strength: evolution or revolution?

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Robert P Hartman; Denis Lyonnet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Validity of prostate-specific antigen as a tumour marker in men with prostate cancer managed by watchful-waiting: correlation with findings at serial endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Fergus V Coakley; Irene Chen; Aliya Qayyum; Antonio C Westphalen; Peter R Carroll; Hedvig Hricak; Mei-Hsiu Chen; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression.

Authors:  Richard Choo; Laurence Klotz; Cyril Danjoux; Gerard C Morton; Gerrit DeBoer; Ewa Szumacher; Neil Fleshner; Peter Bunting; George Hruby
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  How reliable is 12-core prostate biopsy procedure in the detection of prostate cancer?

Authors:  Ege Can Serefoglu; Serkan Altinova; Nevzat Serdar Ugras; Egemen Akincioglu; Erem Asil; M Derya Balbay
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of clinically low risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Oguz Akin; Asim Afaq; Debra Goldman; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Amita Shukla-Dave; James Eastham; Peter Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: preliminary results.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; Patrick C Walsh; Patricia Landis; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate?

Authors:  Alexander P S Kirkham; Mark Emberton; Clare Allen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Are extended biopsies really necessary to improve prostate cancer detection?

Authors:  R Damiano; R Autorino; S Perdonà; M De Sio; A Oliva; C Esposito; F Cantiello; G Di Lorenzo; R Sacco; M D'Armiento
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.554

10.  The role of MRI-targeted and confirmatory biopsies for cancer upstaging at selection in patients considered for active surveillance for clinically low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  François Marliere; Philippe Puech; Ahmed Benkirane; Arnauld Villers; Laurent Lemaitre; Xavier Leroy; Nacim Betrouni; Adil Ouzzane
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  1 in total

1.  National consensus quality indicators to assess quality of care for active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer: An evidence-informed, modified Delphi survey of Canadian urologists/radiation oncologists.

Authors:  Narhari Timilshina; Antonio Finelli; George Tomlinson; Anna Gagliardi; Beate Sander; Shabbir M H Alibhai
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.862

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.