| Literature DB >> 23311921 |
Zachary Hale1, Makito Miyake, Diego Aguilar Palacios, Charles J Rosser.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the stage migration of prostate cancer witnessed in the late 1990's and early 2000's along with the persistent morbidities associated with prostatectomy and radiation therapy, the concept of focal prostate cancer treatment remains quite attractive. Herein we evaluate the tolerability and non-oncologic outcomes of a highly select cohort of men that underwent focal cryoablation of the prostate for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23311921 PMCID: PMC3585847 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-13-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Urol ISSN: 1471-2490 Impact factor: 2.264
Ideal candidate for focal therapy
| Serum PSA | PSA < 10 ng/mL, PSAD < 0.15 ng/mL/g |
| Clinical stage | T1NxMx or T2aNxMx |
| Pathologic evaluation/Gleason score** | 3 + 3 or less (no grade 4 or 5) |
| | No more than 2 adjacent regions positive for cancer |
| Total length of cancer <10 mm total and <7 mm in any 1 core; <1/3 of cores positive for cancer |
* Modified from Sartor et al., 2008 [4] **10 core minimum biopsy schema, plus 2 additional cores for every 10 g of prostate >40 g (max 18 cores).
Demographics and preoperative characteristics
| 65 (55-74) | |
| White | 23 (88) |
| Hispanic | 1 (4) |
| Black | 2 (8) |
| T1c | 26 (100) |
| 3 + 3 | 25 (96) |
| 3 + 4 | 1 (4) |
| </= 10 | 24 (92) |
| 10-20 | 2 (8) |
| | |
| Median performed, n (range) | 40 (30-60) |
| Median cores positive for cancer, n (range) | 4 (1-6) |
| Unilateral Cancer, n (%) | 24 (92) |
| Bilateral Cancer, n (%) | 2 (8) |
| 26(100) | |
| 20 (16-25) | |
| 19.1 |
Figure 1Schematic depicting ‘focal’cryoablation. Ablation can be of single target lesion, of specific side of prostate harboring the cancer or of nearly the entire gland but sparing the posterior lateral aspects were caversonal resides.
Figure 2Biochemical disease free-survival of 26 patients treated with focal cryoablation of the prostate.
Patients with biochemical failure after focal cryoablation of the prostate
| 1 | 6 | 8.8 | Hemi-ablation | 2.8 | 3.7 | No | Watchful Waiting | 3.3 | 31 |
| 2 | 6 | 5.3 | Hemi-ablation | 3.1 | 4.2 | Yes | External beam radiation | 0.4 | 18 |
| 3 | 6 | 4.5 | Hemi-ablation | 1.7 | 3.1 | Yes | Whole gland cryoablation | 0.2 | 15 |
Oncologic and functional outcomes
| Patients with serum PSA failure | 3 (12) |
| Deaths | 0 (0) |
| Metastasis | 0 (0) |
| Erectile Dysfunction Requiring Treatment | 7 (27) |
| Impotent | 0 (0) |
| Urinary Continence | 26 (z100) |
| Fistula | 0 (0) |
| Urethral slough | 0 (0) |
| Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) | 1 (4) |
| Urinary retention | 1 (4) |
| Rash | 1(4) |
Focal cryosurgery outcomes
| Lambert | 25 | 2.3 (median) | ASTRO criteria | 84% (PSA Nadir >50%) | 4% | 71% | 100% | N/A |
| Ellis | 60 | 1.3 (mean) | ASTRO criteria | 80% (ASTRO) | 1.7% | 70.6% @ 1yr | 96.4% | N/A |
| Onik | 48 | 4.5 (mean) | ASTRO criteria | 94% (ASTRO) | 0% | 90% | 100% | N/A |
| Truesdale | 77 | 2 (median) | Phoenix criteria | 73% | 4% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Ward | 1160 | 1.8 (mean) | ASTRO criteria | 75.7% (ASTRO) @ 3yr | 3.7% (Unsure Laterality) | 58.1% | 98.4% | 1.1%^ |
| Bahn | 73 | 3.7 (median) | ASTRO criteria | N/A | 1% | 86% | 100% | N/A |
| Present Study | 26 | 1.6 (mean) | 0.5 ng/ml over nadir
[ | 88% | 0% | 73%* | 100% | 4%^ |
ASTRO criteria, 3 consecutive rises in the serum PSA after the post-radiation PSA nadir; Phoenix criteria, serum PSA nadir post-radiation + 2 ng/ml.
*, Remainder 27% potent with the use of pharmacologic or mechanical aids.
^, urinary retention.