Literature DB >> 18194712

Focal cryosurgery followed by penile rehabilitation as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer: initial results.

David S Ellis1, Theodore B Manny, John C Rewcastle.   

Abstract

The study reported here was undertaken to assess medium short-term efficacy of focal cryoablation as primary therapy for localized prostate cancer and to determine the rate of morbidity in patients who undergo this treatment. Patients were treated with focal cryoablation with argon cryoprobes under ultrasonographic visualization with temperature monitoring. Men who were potent at the time of intervention were encouraged to use a vacuum erectile dysfunction device on a regular basis after treatment. Incontinence was defined as any urine leakage regardless of the number of pads worn (if any). Potency was defined as the ability to achieve an erection sufficient to complete intercourse with or without oral pharmaceuticals. Biochemical failure was defined as 3 successive rises in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration. A total of 60 consecutive patients were treated. Mean patient age was 69.0 years; mean PSA was 7.2 ng/mL, median Gleason score was 6, and median stage was T1c. Before treatment was initiated, all patients were continent and 72.7% were potent. Mean follow-up for the entire population was 15.2+/-7.4 months. Of those patients who were continent before receiving treatment, 3.6% were incontinent at 6 months, but none used any absorbent pads. At last follow-up, 80.4% of patients were biochemically disease free; mean time to failure was 3.5 months among those for whom treatment failed. The positive biopsy rate after first treatment was 23.3%, and mean time to failure was 12.0 months. Of those who underwent a second focal cryoablation procedure after positive biopsy, 66% were subsequently cancer free. All patients who were potent after the first cryoablation procedure regained their potency after the second cryoablation procedure. Focal cryoablation combined with penile rehabilitation as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer is a minimally morbid procedure with acceptable morbidity and the potential for retreatment of a patient if cancer is subsequently detected. Further study is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18194712     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  48 in total

1.  A review of focal therapy techniques in prostate cancer: clinical results for high-intensity focused ultrasound and focal cryoablation.

Authors:  Colin T Iberti; Nihal Mohamed; Michael A Palese
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Focal therapy of prostate cancer: evidence-based analysis for modern selection criteria.

Authors:  Michael R Abern; Matvey Tsivian; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Contemporary outcomes of focal therapy in prostate cancer: what do we know so far...

Authors:  John F Ward
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Focal cryotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matvey Tsivian; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Focal therapy: a new paradigm for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Basir Tareen; Guilherme Godoy; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

Review 6.  Image guidance in the focal treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anthony N Hoang; Dmitry Volkin; Nitin K Yerram; Srinivas Vourganti; Jeffrey Nix; W Marston Linehan; Bradford Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.309

7.  Contemporary technique of intraoperative 3-dimensional ultrasonography-guided transperineal prostate cryotherapy.

Authors:  Venu Chalasani; Lori Gardi; Carlos H Martinez; Donal B Downey; Aaron Fenster; Joseph L Chin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer -choosing the middle ground.

Authors:  Uri Lindner; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Robotic high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: what have we learned in 15 years of clinical use?

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Stefan F Thüroff
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Non-invasive monitoring of branched Au nanoparticle-mediated photothermal ablation.

Authors:  Ken Zhao; Soojeong Cho; Daniel Procissi; Andrew C Larson; Dong-Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 3.368

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.