Literature DB >> 20439642

Prostate-specific antigen kinetics during follow-up are an unreliable trigger for intervention in a prostate cancer surveillance program.

Ashley E Ross1, Stacy Loeb, Patricia Landis, Alan W Partin, Jonathan I Epstein, Anna Kettermann, Zhaoyong Feng, H Ballentine Carter, Patrick C Walsh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the predictive ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity (PSAV) and doubling time (PSADT) for biopsy progression and adverse pathology at prostatectomy among men with low-risk prostate cancer enrolled on an active-surveillance program.
METHODS: We evaluated 290 men who met criteria for active surveillance (ie, PSA density < 0.15 ng/mL/cm(3) and Gleason score < or = 6 with no pattern > or = 4, involving < or = 2 cores with cancer, and < or = 50% involvement of any core by cancer) with two or more serial PSA measurements after diagnosis from 1994 to 2008. Follow-up included twice-yearly digital rectal exam and PSA measurements and yearly surveillance biopsy. Treatment was recommended for biopsy progression (ie, Gleason score > or = 7, or > 2 positive cores, or > 50% core involvement). Sensitivity and specificity of postdiagnostic PSAV and PSADT were explored by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 188 (65%) men remained on active surveillance, and 102 (35%) developed biopsy progression at a median follow-up of 2.9 years. PSADT was not significantly associated with subsequent adverse biopsy findings (P = .83), and PSAV was marginally significant (P = .06). No PSAV or PSADT cut point had both high sensitivity and specificity (area under the curve, 0.61 and 0.59, respectively) for biopsy progression. In those who eventually underwent radical prostatectomy, PSAV (P = .79) and PSADT (P = .87) were not associated with the presence of unfavorable surgical pathology.
CONCLUSION: Postdiagnostic PSA kinetics do not reliably predict adverse pathology and should not be used to replace annual surveillance biopsy for monitoring men on active surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20439642     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.7311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  89 in total

1.  Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Oguz Akin; Jonathan A Coleman; Sarah Crane; Mark Emberton; Larry Goldenberg; Hedvig Hricak; Mike W Kattan; John Kurhanewicz; Caroline M Moore; Chris Parker; Thomas J Polascik; Peter Scardino; Nicholas van As; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Molecular profiling of indolent human prostate cancer: tackling technical challenges to achieve high-fidelity genome-wide data.

Authors:  Thomas A Dunn; Helen L Fedor; Angelo M De Marzo; Jun Luo
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  The Prostate Health Index: a new test for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; William J Catalona
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2014-04

5.  Assessing prostate cancer growth with citrate measured by intact tissue proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  R Dittrich; J Kurth; E A Decelle; E M DeFeo; M Taupitz; S Wu; C-L Wu; W S McDougal; L L Cheng
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 5.554

6.  Surveillance biopsy and active treatment during active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Katsuyoshi Hashine; Hiroyuki Iio; Yoshiteru Ueno; Shohei Tsukimori; Iku Ninomiya
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: diversity of practice across Europe.

Authors:  A Azmi; R A Dillon; S Borghesi; M Dunne; R E Power; L Marignol; B D P O'Neill
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Variation in serum prostate-specific antigen levels in men with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance.

Authors:  Behfar Ehdaie; Bing Ying Poon; Daniel D Sjoberg; Pedro Recabal; Vincent Laudone; Karim Touijer; James Eastham; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Clinical implications of family history of prostate cancer and genetic risk single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profiles in an active surveillance cohort.

Authors:  Chee L Goh; Edward J Saunders; Daniel A Leongamornlert; Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz; Karen Thomas; Elizabeth D Selvadurai; Ruth Woode-Amissah; Tokhir Dadaev; Nadiya Mahmud; Elena Castro; David Olmos; Michelle Guy; Koveela Govindasami; Lynne T O'Brien; Amanda L Hall; Rosemary A Wilkinson; Emma J Sawyer; Ali Amin Al Olama; Douglas F Easton; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Chris C Parker; Rosalind A Eeles
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 10.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; H Ballentine Carter; Abbey Lepor; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.