Literature DB >> 23311739

Comparison of postoperative vault height predictability using white-to-white or sulcus diameter-based sizing for the visian implantable collamer lens.

Dan Z Reinstein1, Carlo F Lovisolo, Timothy J Archer, Marine Gobbe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare vault height predictability of Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL; Staar Surgical) sizing using a sulcus diameter-based formula or the manufacturer-recommended white-to-white-based method.
METHODS: In 50 myopic eyes, ICL size was calculated using both a formula including sulcus diameter and the traditional formula based on white-to-white diameter. Sulcus diameter was measured using Artemis 2 very high-frequency (VHF) digital ultrasound (ArcScan Inc). Implantation was based on the sulcus diameter derived size. Actual postoperative vault height achieved was measured by VHF digital ultrasound scanning. Circle segment trigonometry was used to calculate the vault height that would have resulted had lens sizing been based on the white-to-white formula.
RESULTS: The same lens size would have been used in 60% of eyes, a smaller lens would have been used in 34% of eyes and a larger lens in 6% of eyes had lens sizing been based on the white-to-white formula. Mean vault for eyes with lenses sized using the sulcus diameter formula was 0.37±0.16 mm (range: 0.08 to 0.92 mm), with 2% <0.09 mm, the recognized low-vault height for risk of cataract. Circle segment trigonometry predicted that the vault height would have been 0.24±0.28 mm (range: -0.31 to 0.92 mm), with 26% <0.09 mm had lens sizing been based on the white-to-white formula.
CONCLUSIONS: Significantly better predictability of postoperative vault height was achieved by including sulcus diameter into the ICL sizing formula compared with using the traditional white-to-white-based formula. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23311739     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20121210-02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  10 in total

1.  Angle-to-angle and spur-to-spur distance analysis with high-resolution optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Robert Montés-Micó; Pedro Tañá-Rivero; Salvador Aguilar-Córcoles; María Ruiz-Santos; María Dolores Rodríguez-Carrillo; Ramón Ruiz-Mesa
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-08-16

2.  Inter-Eye Vault Differences of Implantable Collamer Lens Measured Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Santiago Cerpa Manito; Angel Sánchez Trancón; Oscar Torrado Sierra; António M G Baptista; Pedro Miguel Serra
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-29

3.  Pseudophacomorphic Glaucoma along with Pupillary Block after Visian™ Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation for High Myopia.

Authors:  Michael V McCaughey; Thomas Mifflin; Carlton R Fenzl; Jason Goldsmith; Majid Moshirfar
Journal:  Open J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11

Review 4.  Meta-analysis and review: effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens.

Authors:  Mark Packer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-09

5.  Buffering zone of implantable Collamer lens sizing in V4c.

Authors:  Seung Wan Nam; Dong Hui Lim; Joo Hyun; Eui-Sang Chung; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Phakic intraocular lens: Getting the right size.

Authors:  Kalyaani Deshpande; Rushad Shroff; Partha Biswas; Kamal Kapur; Naren Shetty; Ann Sarah Koshy; Pooja Khamar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Agreement of implantable collamer lens sizes using parameters from different devices.

Authors:  Manachai Nonpassopon; Passara Jongkhajornpong; Prae Phimpho; Nontawat Cheewaruangroj; Kaevalin Lekhanont; Varintorn Chuckpaiwong
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-08

8.  Implantable collamer lens sizing based on measurement of the sulcus-to-sulcus distance in ultrasound biomicroscopy video clips and ZZ ICL formula.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Jie Shao; Li Zheng; Xia Zhao; Shu Chen
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with a New Multifunctional Unit and Five Other Devices.

Authors:  Bo Yi Kim; Ikhyun Jun
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-15

10.  Comparison of the Orbscan II topographer and the iTrace aberrometer for the measurements of keratometry and corneal diameter in myopic patients.

Authors:  Yao Chen; Xiaobo Xia
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.209

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.