Literature DB >> 23307922

Impact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion.

P S van der Schaaf1, E Dusseldorp, F M Keuning, W A Janssen, E O Noorthoorn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The physical environment is presumed to have an effect on aggression and also on the use of seclusion on psychiatric wards. Multicentre studies that include a broad variety of design features found on psychiatric wards and that control for patient, staff and general ward characteristics are scarce. AIMS: To explore the effect of design features on the risk of being secluded, the number of seclusion incidents and the time in seclusion, for patients admitted to locked wards for intensive psychiatric care.
METHOD: Data on the building quality and safety of psychiatric as well as forensic wards (n = 199) were combined with data on the frequency and type of coercive measures per admission (n = 23 868 admissions of n = 14 834 patients) on these wards, over a 12-month period. We used non-linear principal components analysis (CATPCA) to reduce the observed design features into a smaller number of uncorrelated principal components. Two-level multilevel (logistic) regression analyses were used to explore the relationship with seclusion. Admission was the first level in the analyses and ward was the second level.
RESULTS: Overall, 14 design features had a significant effect on the risk of being secluded during admission. The 'presence of an outdoor space', 'special safety measures' and a large 'number of patients in the building' increased the risk of being secluded. Design features such as more 'total private space per patient', a higher 'level of comfort' and greater 'visibility on the ward', decreased the risk of being secluded.
CONCLUSIONS: A number of design features had an effect on the use of seclusion and restraint. The study highlighted the need for a greater focus on the impact of the physical environment on patients, as, along with other interventions, this can reduce the need for seclusion and restraint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23307922     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.118422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  26 in total

1.  [Architectural modernization of psychiatric hospitals influences the use of coercive measures].

Authors:  T Rohe; T Dresler; M Stuhlinger; M Weber; T Strittmatter; A J Fallgatter
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Understanding Mental Health Service User Experiences of Restraint Through Debriefing: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Sara Ling; Kristin Cleverley; Athina Perivolaris
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.356

3.  One-year incidence and prevalence of seclusion: Dutch findings in an international perspective.

Authors:  Eric Noorthoorn; Peter Lepping; Wim Janssen; Adriaan Hoogendoorn; Henk Nijman; Guy Widdershoven; Tilman Steinert
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  Long-Term Impact of a Tailored Seclusion Reduction Program: Evidence for Change?

Authors:  Patricia S Mann-Poll; Annet Smit; Eric O Noorthoorn; Wim A Janssen; Bauke Koekkoek; Giel J M Hutschemaekers
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2018-09

5.  [Influence of staffing levels on conflicts in inpatient psychiatric care].

Authors:  A Nienaber; A Heinz; M A Rapp; F Bermpohl; M Schulz; J Behrens; M Löhr
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  Variables Associated With the Subjective Experience of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Inpatients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carlos Aguilera-Serrano; Jose Guzman-Parra; Juan A Garcia-Sanchez; Berta Moreno-Küstner; Fermin Mayoral-Cleries
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.356

Review 7.  Space and Well-Being in High Security Environments.

Authors:  Thomas Ross; Jan Bulla; María Isabel Fontao
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 5.435

8.  Do patient and ward-related characteristics influence the use of coercive measures? Results from the EUNOMIA international study.

Authors:  Lucie Kalisova; Jiri Raboch; Alexander Nawka; Gaia Sampogna; Libor Cihal; Thomas W Kallert; Georgi Onchev; Anastasia Karastergiou; Valeria Del Vecchio; Andrzej Kiejna; Tomasz Adamowski; Francisco Torres-Gonzales; Jorge A Cervilla; Stephan Priebe; Domenico Giacco; Lars Kjellin; Algirdas Dembinskas; Andrea Fiorillo
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 4.328

9.  Psychiatric staff on the wards does not share attitudes on aggression.

Authors:  Tero Laiho; Nina Lindberg; Grigori Joffe; Hanna Putkonen; Anja Hottinen; Raija Kontio; Eila Sailas
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2014-04-22

10.  Design features that reduce the use of seclusion and restraint in mental health facilities: a rapid systematic review.

Authors:  Sanne Oostermeijer; Catherine Brasier; Carol Harvey; Bridget Hamilton; Cath Roper; Andrew Martel; Justine Fletcher; Lisa Brophy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.