Literature DB >> 29527618

Long-Term Impact of a Tailored Seclusion Reduction Program: Evidence for Change?

Patricia S Mann-Poll1, Annet Smit2, Eric O Noorthoorn3,4, Wim A Janssen5, Bauke Koekkoek2,6, Giel J M Hutschemaekers1,7.   

Abstract

International comparative studies show that Dutch seclusion rates are relatively high. Therefore, several programs to change this practice were developed and implemented. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of a seclusion reduction program over a long time frame, from 2004 until 2013. Three phases could be identified; the phase of development and implementation of the program (2004-2007), the project phase (2008-2010) and the consolidation phase (2011-2013). Five inpatient wards of a mental health institute were monitored. Each ward had one or more seclusion rooms. Primary outcome were the number and the duration of seclusion incidents. Involuntary medication was monitored as well to rule out substitution of one coercive measure by another. Case mix correction for patient characteristics was done by a multi-level logistic regression analysis with patient characteristics as predictors and hours seclusion per admission hours as outcome. Seclusion use reduced significantly during the project phase, both in number (-73%) and duration (-80%) and was not substituted by the use of enforced medication. Patient compilation as analyzed by the multi- level regression seemed not to confound the findings. Findings show a slight increase in number and seclusion days over the last year of monitoring. Whether this should be interpreted as a continuous or temporary trend remains unclear and is subject for further investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inpatient psychiatry; Organizational change; Program evaluation; Seclusion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29527618     DOI: 10.1007/s11126-018-9571-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Q        ISSN: 0033-2720


  40 in total

Review 1.  Nurses' attitudes to the use of seclusion: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Brenda Happell; Alison Harrow
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.503

2.  Learning from experience: Using action research to discover consumer needs in post-seclusion debriefing.

Authors:  Rob Ryan; Brenda Happell
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.503

3.  Restraint and seclusion: a distressing treatment option?

Authors:  A Moran; A Cocoman; P A Scott; A Matthews; V Staniuliene; M Valimaki
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.952

4.  Legal provisions and practice in the management of violent patients. a case vignette study in 16 European countries.

Authors:  Tilman Steinert; Peter Lepping
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 5.361

5.  Seclusion Reduction in Dutch Mental Health Care: Did Hospitals Meet Goals?

Authors:  Eric O Noorthoorn; Yolande Voskes; Wim A Janssen; Cornelis L Mulder; Roland van de Sande; Henk L I Nijman; Annet Smit; Adriaan W Hoogendoorn; Annelea Bousardt; Guy A M Widdershoven
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Patients' reports of traumatic or harmful experiences within the psychiatric setting.

Authors:  B Christopher Frueh; Rebecca G Knapp; Karen J Cusack; Anouk L Grubaugh; Julie A Sauvageot; Victoria C Cousins; Eunsil Yim; Cynthia S Robins; Jeannine Monnier; Thomas G Hiers
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Factors contributing to mental health professionals' decision to use seclusion.

Authors:  Patricia S Mann-Poll; Annet Smit; Wim J de Vries; Christien E Boumans; Giel J M Hutschemaekers
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Reduction in the use of seclusion by the methodical work approach.

Authors:  Christien E Boumans; Jos I M Egger; Pierre M Souren; Giel J M Hutschemaekers
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.503

Review 9.  Psychiatric intensive care units: a literature review.

Authors:  Len Bowers; Debra Jeffery; Hulya Bilgin; Manuela Jarrett; Alan Simpson; Julia Jones
Journal:  Int J Soc Psychiatry       Date:  2008-01

10.  Evaluation of behavioral changes and subjective distress after exposure to coercive inpatient interventions.

Authors:  Irina Georgieva; Cornelis L Mulder; Richard Whittington
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.630

View more
  5 in total

1.  Measures to Avoid Coercion in Psychiatry and Their Efficacy.

Authors:  Sophie Hirsch; Tilman Steinert
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  The Forensic High and Intensive Care Monitor: Measurement Properties of a Model Fidelity Scale for Contact-Based Care in Forensic Psychiatry.

Authors:  Sylvia Gerritsen; Guy A M Widdershoven; Anne L van Melle; Henrica C W de Vet; Yolande Voskes
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2022-02-16

3.  The Compulsory Care Act: Early Observations and Expectations of In- or Outpatient Involuntary Treatment.

Authors:  Stephan Gemsa; Eric O Noorthoorn; Peter Lepping; Hein A de Haan; Andre I Wierdsma; Giel J M Hutschemaekers
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 4.  Preventing and reducing 'coercion' in mental health services: an international scoping review of English-language studies.

Authors:  P Gooding; B McSherry; C Roper
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2020-02-09       Impact factor: 6.392

5.  Does high and intensive care reduce coercion? Association of HIC model fidelity to seclusion use in the Netherlands.

Authors:  A L Van Melle; E O Noorthoorn; G A M Widdershoven; C L Mulder; Y Voskes
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.630

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.