Literature DB >> 23307736

Quantum back-action of an individual variable-strength measurement.

M Hatridge1, S Shankar, M Mirrahimi, F Schackert, K Geerlings, T Brecht, K M Sliwa, B Abdo, L Frunzio, S M Girvin, R J Schoelkopf, M H Devoret.   

Abstract

Measuring a quantum system can randomly perturb its state. The strength and nature of this back-action depend on the quantity that is measured. In a partial measurement performed by an ideal apparatus, quantum physics predicts that the system remains in a pure state whose evolution can be tracked perfectly from the measurement record. We demonstrated this property using a superconducting qubit dispersively coupled to a cavity traversed by a microwave signal. The back-action on the qubit state of a single measurement of both signal quadratures was observed and shown to produce a stochastic operation whose action is determined by the measurement result. This accurate monitoring of a qubit state is an essential prerequisite for measurement-based feedback control of quantum systems.

Year:  2013        PMID: 23307736     DOI: 10.1126/science.1226897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  17 in total

1.  Measurement-based control of a mechanical oscillator at its thermal decoherence rate.

Authors:  D J Wilson; V Sudhir; N Piro; R Schilling; A Ghadimi; T J Kippenberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Deterministic entanglement of superconducting qubits by parity measurement and feedback.

Authors:  D Ristè; M Dukalski; C A Watson; G de Lange; M J Tiggelman; Ya M Blanter; K W Lehnert; R N Schouten; L DiCarlo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Observing single quantum trajectories of a superconducting quantum bit.

Authors:  K W Murch; S J Weber; C Macklin; I Siddiqi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Autonomously stabilized entanglement between two superconducting quantum bits.

Authors:  S Shankar; M Hatridge; Z Leghtas; K M Sliwa; A Narla; U Vool; S M Girvin; L Frunzio; M Mirrahimi; M H Devoret
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Mapping the optimal route between two quantum states.

Authors:  S J Weber; A Chantasri; J Dressel; A N Jordan; K W Murch; I Siddiqi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Tracking photon jumps with repeated quantum non-demolition parity measurements.

Authors:  L Sun; A Petrenko; Z Leghtas; B Vlastakis; G Kirchmair; K M Sliwa; A Narla; M Hatridge; S Shankar; J Blumoff; L Frunzio; M Mirrahimi; M H Devoret; R J Schoelkopf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Superconducting-qubit readout via low-backaction electro-optic transduction.

Authors:  R D Delaney; M D Urmey; S Mittal; B M Brubaker; J M Kindem; P S Burns; C A Regal; K W Lehnert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 69.504

8.  Nonlinear optomechanical measurement of mechanical motion.

Authors:  G A Brawley; M R Vanner; P E Larsen; S Schmid; A Boisen; W P Bowen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Mapping quantum state dynamics in spontaneous emission.

Authors:  M Naghiloo; N Foroozani; D Tan; A Jadbabaie; K W Murch
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Exact quantum Bayesian rule for qubit measurements in circuit QED.

Authors:  Wei Feng; Pengfei Liang; Lupei Qin; Xin-Qi Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.