Literature DB >> 35705821

Superconducting-qubit readout via low-backaction electro-optic transduction.

R D Delaney1,2, M D Urmey3,4, S Mittal3,4, B M Brubaker3,4, J M Kindem3,4, P S Burns3,4, C A Regal3,4, K W Lehnert3,4,5.   

Abstract

Entangling microwave-frequency superconducting quantum processors through optical light at ambient temperature would enable means of secure communication and distributed quantum information processing1. However, transducing quantum signals between these disparate regimes of the electro-magnetic spectrum remains an outstanding goal2-9, and interfacing superconducting qubits, which are constrained to operate at millikelvin temperatures, with electro-optic transducers presents considerable challenges owing to the deleterious effects of optical photons on superconductors9,10. Moreover, many remote entanglement protocols11-14 require multiple qubit gates both preceding and following the upconversion of the quantum state, and thus an ideal transducer should impart minimal backaction15 on the qubit. Here we demonstrate readout of a superconducting transmon qubit through a low-backaction electro-optomechanical transducer. The modular nature of the transducer and circuit quantum electrodynamics system used in this work enable complete isolation of the qubit from optical photons, and the backaction on the qubit from the transducer is less than that imparted by thermal radiation from the environment. Moderate improvements in the transducer bandwidth and the added noise will enable us to leverage the full suite of tools available in circuit quantum electrodynamics to demonstrate transduction of non-classical signals from a superconducting qubit to the optical domain.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35705821     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04720-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   69.504


  19 in total

1.  Measurement-based entanglement under conditions of extreme photon loss.

Authors:  Earl T Campbell; Simon C Benjamin
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Superconducting qubit to optical photon transduction.

Authors:  Mohammad Mirhosseini; Alp Sipahigil; Mahmoud Kalaee; Oskar Painter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Quantum back-action of an individual variable-strength measurement.

Authors:  M Hatridge; S Shankar; M Mirrahimi; F Schackert; K Geerlings; T Brecht; K M Sliwa; B Abdo; L Frunzio; S M Girvin; R J Schoelkopf; M H Devoret
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Entanglement distillation between solid-state quantum network nodes.

Authors:  N Kalb; A A Reiserer; P C Humphreys; J J W Bakermans; S J Kamerling; N H Nickerson; S C Benjamin; D J Twitchen; M Markham; R Hanson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Coherent Microwave-to-Optical Conversion via Six-Wave Mixing in Rydberg Atoms.

Authors:  Jingshan Han; Thibault Vogt; Christian Gross; Dieter Jaksch; Martin Kiffner; Wenhui Li
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor.

Authors:  Frank Arute; Kunal Arya; Ryan Babbush; Dave Bacon; Joseph C Bardin; Rami Barends; Rupak Biswas; Sergio Boixo; Fernando G S L Brandao; David A Buell; Brian Burkett; Yu Chen; Zijun Chen; Ben Chiaro; Roberto Collins; William Courtney; Andrew Dunsworth; Edward Farhi; Brooks Foxen; Austin Fowler; Craig Gidney; Marissa Giustina; Rob Graff; Keith Guerin; Steve Habegger; Matthew P Harrigan; Michael J Hartmann; Alan Ho; Markus Hoffmann; Trent Huang; Travis S Humble; Sergei V Isakov; Evan Jeffrey; Zhang Jiang; Dvir Kafri; Kostyantyn Kechedzhi; Julian Kelly; Paul V Klimov; Sergey Knysh; Alexander Korotkov; Fedor Kostritsa; David Landhuis; Mike Lindmark; Erik Lucero; Dmitry Lyakh; Salvatore Mandrà; Jarrod R McClean; Matthew McEwen; Anthony Megrant; Xiao Mi; Kristel Michielsen; Masoud Mohseni; Josh Mutus; Ofer Naaman; Matthew Neeley; Charles Neill; Murphy Yuezhen Niu; Eric Ostby; Andre Petukhov; John C Platt; Chris Quintana; Eleanor G Rieffel; Pedram Roushan; Nicholas C Rubin; Daniel Sank; Kevin J Satzinger; Vadim Smelyanskiy; Kevin J Sung; Matthew D Trevithick; Amit Vainsencher; Benjamin Villalonga; Theodore White; Z Jamie Yao; Ping Yeh; Adam Zalcman; Hartmut Neven; John M Martinis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Proposal for Heralded Generation and Detection of Entangled Microwave-Optical-Photon Pairs.

Authors:  Changchun Zhong; Zhixin Wang; Changling Zou; Mengzhen Zhang; Xu Han; Wei Fu; Mingrui Xu; S Shankar; Michel H Devoret; Hong X Tang; Liang Jiang
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  On-chip coherent microwave-to-optical transduction mediated by ytterbium in YVO4.

Authors:  John G Bartholomew; Jake Rochman; Tian Xie; Jonathan M Kindem; Andrei Ruskuc; Ioana Craiciu; Mi Lei; Andrei Faraon
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Converting microwave and telecom photons with a silicon photonic nanomechanical interface.

Authors:  G Arnold; M Wulf; S Barzanjeh; E S Redchenko; A Rueda; W J Hease; F Hassani; J M Fink
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Quantum-enabled operation of a microwave-optical interface.

Authors:  Rishabh Sahu; William Hease; Alfredo Rueda; Georg Arnold; Liu Qiu; Johannes M Fink
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.