Literature DB >> 24108052

Observing single quantum trajectories of a superconducting quantum bit.

K W Murch1, S J Weber, C Macklin, I Siddiqi.   

Abstract

The length of time that a quantum system can exist in a superposition state is determined by how strongly it interacts with its environment. This interaction entangles the quantum state with the inherent fluctuations of the environment. If these fluctuations are not measured, the environment can be viewed as a source of noise, causing random evolution of the quantum system from an initially pure state into a statistical mixture--a process known as decoherence. However, by accurately measuring the environment in real time, the quantum system can be maintained in a pure state and its time evolution described by a 'quantum trajectory' determined by the measurement outcome. Here we use weak measurements to monitor a microwave cavity containing a superconducting quantum bit (qubit), and track the individual quantum trajectories of the system. In this set-up, the environment is dominated by the fluctuations of a single electromagnetic mode of the cavity. Using a near-quantum-limited parametric amplifier, we selectively measure either the phase or the amplitude of the cavity field, and thereby confine trajectories to either the equator or a meridian of the Bloch sphere. We perform quantum state tomography at discrete times along the trajectory to verify that we have faithfully tracked the state of the quantum system as it diffuses on the surface of the Bloch sphere. Our results demonstrate that decoherence can be mitigated by environmental monitoring, and validate the foundation of quantum feedback approaches based on Bayesian statistics. Moreover, our experiments suggest a new means of implementing 'quantum steering'--the harnessing of action at a distance to manipulate quantum states through measurement.

Year:  2013        PMID: 24108052     DOI: 10.1038/nature12539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  15 in total

1.  Generation of spin squeezing via continuous quantum nondemolition measurement

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2000-08-21       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  States of an ensemble of two-level atoms with reduced quantum uncertainty.

Authors:  Monika H Schleier-Smith; Ian D Leroux; Vladan Vuletić
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  ac Stark shift and dephasing of a superconducting qubit strongly coupled to a cavity field.

Authors:  D I Schuster; A Wallraff; A Blais; L Frunzio; R-S Huang; J Majer; S M Girvin; R J Schoelkopf
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Coherent state evolution in a superconducting qubit from partial-collapse measurement.

Authors:  N Katz; M Ansmann; Radoslaw C Bialczak; Erik Lucero; R McDermott; Matthew Neeley; Matthias Steffen; E M Weig; A N Cleland; John M Martinis; A N Korotkov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Progressive field-state collapse and quantum non-demolition photon counting.

Authors:  Christine Guerlin; Julien Bernu; Samuel Deléglise; Clément Sayrin; Sébastien Gleyzes; Stefan Kuhr; Michel Brune; Jean-Michel Raimond; Serge Haroche
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Reversal of the weak measurement of a quantum state in a superconducting phase qubit.

Authors:  Nadav Katz; Matthew Neeley; M Ansmann; Radoslaw C Bialczak; M Hofheinz; Erik Lucero; A O'Connell; H Wang; A N Cleland; John M Martinis; Alexander N Korotkov
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Partial-measurement backaction and nonclassical weak values in a superconducting circuit.

Authors:  J P Groen; D Ristè; L Tornberg; J Cramer; P C de Groot; T Picot; G Johansson; L DiCarlo
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Observation of quantum jumps in a superconducting artificial atom.

Authors:  R Vijay; D H Slichter; I Siddiqi
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 9.161

9.  Real-time quantum feedback prepares and stabilizes photon number states.

Authors:  Clément Sayrin; Igor Dotsenko; Xingxing Zhou; Bruno Peaudecerf; Théo Rybarczyk; Sébastien Gleyzes; Pierre Rouchon; Mazyar Mirrahimi; Hadis Amini; Michel Brune; Jean-Michel Raimond; Serge Haroche
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Spin squeezing of a cold atomic ensemble with the nuclear spin of one-half.

Authors:  T Takano; M Fuyama; R Namiki; Y Takahashi
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 9.161

View more
  22 in total

1.  Deterministic entanglement of superconducting qubits by parity measurement and feedback.

Authors:  D Ristè; M Dukalski; C A Watson; G de Lange; M J Tiggelman; Ya M Blanter; K W Lehnert; R N Schouten; L DiCarlo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Quantum physics: Watching the wavefunction collapse.

Authors:  Andrew N Jordan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Quantum physics: The path most travelled.

Authors:  Adrian Lupascu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Mapping the optimal route between two quantum states.

Authors:  S J Weber; A Chantasri; J Dressel; A N Jordan; K W Murch; I Siddiqi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Topological transition in measurement-induced geometric phases.

Authors:  Valentin Gebhart; Kyrylo Snizhko; Thomas Wellens; Andreas Buchleitner; Alessandro Romito; Yuval Gefen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Tracking photon jumps with repeated quantum non-demolition parity measurements.

Authors:  L Sun; A Petrenko; Z Leghtas; B Vlastakis; G Kirchmair; K M Sliwa; A Narla; M Hatridge; S Shankar; J Blumoff; L Frunzio; M Mirrahimi; M H Devoret; R J Schoelkopf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Experimental on-demand recovery of entanglement by local operations within non-Markovian dynamics.

Authors:  Adeline Orieux; Antonio D'Arrigo; Giacomo Ferranti; Rosario Lo Franco; Giuliano Benenti; Elisabetta Paladino; Giuseppe Falci; Fabio Sciarrino; Paolo Mataloni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Partially coherent ultrafast spectrography.

Authors:  C Bourassin-Bouchet; M-E Couprie
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Nonlinear optomechanical measurement of mechanical motion.

Authors:  G A Brawley; M R Vanner; P E Larsen; S Schmid; A Boisen; W P Bowen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Characterizing entanglement of an artificial atom and a cavity cat state with Bell's inequality.

Authors:  Brian Vlastakis; Andrei Petrenko; Nissim Ofek; Luyan Sun; Zaki Leghtas; Katrina Sliwa; Yehan Liu; Michael Hatridge; Jacob Blumoff; Luigi Frunzio; Mazyar Mirrahimi; Liang Jiang; M H Devoret; R J Schoelkopf
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.