Literature DB >> 24132292

Deterministic entanglement of superconducting qubits by parity measurement and feedback.

D Ristè1, M Dukalski, C A Watson, G de Lange, M J Tiggelman, Ya M Blanter, K W Lehnert, R N Schouten, L DiCarlo.   

Abstract

The stochastic evolution of quantum systems during measurement is arguably the most enigmatic feature of quantum mechanics. Measuring a quantum system typically steers it towards a classical state, destroying the coherence of an initial quantum superposition and the entanglement with other quantum systems. Remarkably, the measurement of a shared property between non-interacting quantum systems can generate entanglement, starting from an uncorrelated state. Of special interest in quantum computing is the parity measurement, which projects the state of multiple qubits (quantum bits) to a state with an even or odd number of excited qubits. A parity meter must discern the two qubit-excitation parities with high fidelity while preserving coherence between same-parity states. Despite numerous proposals for atomic, semiconducting and superconducting qubits, realizing a parity meter that creates entanglement for both even and odd measurement results has remained an outstanding challenge. Here we perform a time-resolved, continuous parity measurement of two superconducting qubits using the cavity in a three-dimensional circuit quantum electrodynamics architecture and phase-sensitive parametric amplification. Using postselection, we produce entanglement by parity measurement reaching 88 per cent fidelity to the closest Bell state. Incorporating the parity meter in a feedback-control loop, we transform the entanglement generation from probabilistic to fully deterministic, achieving 66 per cent fidelity to a target Bell state on demand. These realizations of a parity meter and a feedback-enabled deterministic measurement protocol provide key ingredients for active quantum error correction in the solid state.

Year:  2013        PMID: 24132292     DOI: 10.1038/nature12513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  16 in total

1.  Deterministic quantum teleportation of atomic qubits.

Authors:  M D Barrett; J Chiaverini; T Schaetz; J Britton; W M Itano; J D Jost; E Knill; C Langer; D Leibfried; R Ozeri; D J Wineland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Deterministic quantum teleportation with atoms.

Authors:  M Riebe; H Häffner; C F Roos; W Hänsel; J Benhelm; G P T Lancaster; T W Körber; C Becher; F Schmidt-Kaler; D F V James; R Blatt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Charge detection enables free-electron quantum computation.

Authors:  C W J Beenakker; D P DiVincenzo; C Emary; M Kindermann
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Observation of high coherence in Josephson junction qubits measured in a three-dimensional circuit QED architecture.

Authors:  Hanhee Paik; D I Schuster; Lev S Bishop; G Kirchmair; G Catelani; A P Sears; B R Johnson; M J Reagor; L Frunzio; L I Glazman; S M Girvin; M H Devoret; R J Schoelkopf
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Quantum teleportation between light and matter.

Authors:  Jacob F Sherson; Hanna Krauter; Rasmus K Olsson; Brian Julsgaard; Klemens Hammerer; Ignacio Cirac; Eugene S Polzik
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Progressive field-state collapse and quantum non-demolition photon counting.

Authors:  Christine Guerlin; Julien Bernu; Samuel Deléglise; Clément Sayrin; Sébastien Gleyzes; Stefan Kuhr; Michel Brune; Jean-Michel Raimond; Serge Haroche
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Controlling the spontaneous emission of a superconducting transmon qubit.

Authors:  A A Houck; J A Schreier; B R Johnson; J M Chow; Jens Koch; J M Gambetta; D I Schuster; L Frunzio; M H Devoret; S M Girvin; R J Schoelkopf
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Two-qubit state tomography using a joint dispersive readout.

Authors:  S Filipp; P Maurer; P J Leek; M Baur; R Bianchetti; J M Fink; M Göppl; L Steffen; J M Gambetta; A Blais; A Wallraff
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 9.161

9.  Feedback control of a solid-state qubit using high-fidelity projective measurement.

Authors:  D Ristè; C C Bultink; K W Lehnert; L DiCarlo
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 9.161

10.  Superconducting circuits for quantum information: an outlook.

Authors:  M H Devoret; R J Schoelkopf
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  15 in total

1.  Autonomously stabilized entanglement between two superconducting quantum bits.

Authors:  S Shankar; M Hatridge; Z Leghtas; K M Sliwa; A Narla; U Vool; S M Girvin; L Frunzio; M Mirrahimi; M H Devoret
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Dissipative production of a maximally entangled steady state of two quantum bits.

Authors:  Y Lin; J P Gaebler; F Reiter; T R Tan; R Bowler; A S Sørensen; D Leibfried; D J Wineland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Mapping the optimal route between two quantum states.

Authors:  S J Weber; A Chantasri; J Dressel; A N Jordan; K W Murch; I Siddiqi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Tracking photon jumps with repeated quantum non-demolition parity measurements.

Authors:  L Sun; A Petrenko; Z Leghtas; B Vlastakis; G Kirchmair; K M Sliwa; A Narla; M Hatridge; S Shankar; J Blumoff; L Frunzio; M Mirrahimi; M H Devoret; R J Schoelkopf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Trade off-free entanglement stabilization in a superconducting qutrit-qubit system.

Authors:  T Brown; E Doucet; D Ristè; G Ribeill; K Cicak; J Aumentado; R Simmonds; L Govia; A Kamal; L Ranzani
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Experimental demonstration of continuous quantum error correction.

Authors:  William P Livingston; Machiel S Blok; Emmanuel Flurin; Justin Dressel; Andrew N Jordan; Irfan Siddiqi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Nonlinear optomechanical measurement of mechanical motion.

Authors:  G A Brawley; M R Vanner; P E Larsen; S Schmid; A Boisen; W P Bowen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Coherent controlization using superconducting qubits.

Authors:  Nicolai Friis; Alexey A Melnikov; Gerhard Kirchmair; Hans J Briegel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Repeated quantum error correction on a continuously encoded qubit by real-time feedback.

Authors:  J Cramer; N Kalb; M A Rol; B Hensen; M S Blok; M Markham; D J Twitchen; R Hanson; T H Taminiau
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Quantum-limited heat conduction over macroscopic distances.

Authors:  Matti Partanen; Kuan Yen Tan; Joonas Govenius; Russell E Lake; Miika K Mäkelä; Tuomo Tanttu; Mikko Möttönen
Journal:  Nat Phys       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 20.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.