| Literature DB >> 23304141 |
Michel Herranz1, Alvaro Ruibal.
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among the population of the Western world. Diagnostic methods include mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance; meanwhile, nuclear medicine techniques have a secondary role, being useful in regional assessment and therapy followup. Optical imaging is a very promising imaging technique that uses near-infrared light to assess optical properties of tissues and is expected to play an important role in breast cancer detection. Optical breast imaging can be performed by intrinsic breast tissue contrast alone (hemoglobin, water, and lipid content) or with the use of exogenous fluorescent probes that target specific molecules for breast cancer. Major advantages of optical imaging are that it does not use any radioactive components, very high sensitivity, relatively inexpensive, easily accessible, and the potential to be combined in a multimodal approach with other technologies such as mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and positron emission tomography. Moreover, optical imaging agents could, potentially, be used as "theranostics," combining the process of diagnosis and therapy.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23304141 PMCID: PMC3529498 DOI: 10.1155/2012/863747
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oncol ISSN: 1687-8450 Impact factor: 4.375
Figure 1Optical breast-imaging basis. (a) Optical imaging without contrast agent where absorption results in decreased light intensity. (b) Optical imaging with contrast agent where a fluorescent probe emits light at a higher wavelength.
Figure 2Breast optical imaging prototype. Patient lies in prone position. Soft compression in a plane and detection in the opposite one.
Figure 3Endogenous absorption related to wavelength. HHb. Hemoglobin. O2Hb: Oxigenated Hemoglobin.
Figure 4(a) Estructure of ICG. (b) Absorption/fluorescene spectrum of ICG.
Devices used for clinical trials of ICG Fluorescence imaging. adapted from: Marshal et al.; The Open Surgical Oncology Journal, 2010, 2, 12–25.
| Device | Excitation source | Fluorescence collection | Detector | Working distance | Field of view | Depth of penetration | Integration time or frames per Sec (FPS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Photodynamic Eye (PDE) Hamamatsu | Laser-emitting diodes (LEDs) centered at 760 nm, incident power not specified | Bandpass filter > 820 nm | CCD | 20 cm | Not given, but limited | 2 cm | Not specified |
| SPY (Novadaq) | Laser-emitting at 806 nm, 2.0–2.7 W, incident power not specified | 835 nm “camera,” not specified | CCD | 30 cm | 56 cm2 | 1 mm DOP | 30 fps |
| FDPM imager (Texas) | Laser diode, 785 ± 10 nm. <1.9 mW/cm2 | Notch filters at 785 nm, and at 830 nm | Gen III intensifier coupled to CCD, gain modulatable for tomography | Variable, but reported <76.2 cm | Max reported FOV 900 cm2 | Estimated to be 4 cm | 50–800 msec |
| IC-View (Pulsion Medical) | Laser diode 780 nm (0.16 W), incident power not specified | Not specified | CCD | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified |
| FLARE (Israel Beth Deaconess Hospital) | LEDs emitting 745–779 nm, 14 mW/cm2 | Bandpass filter 800–848 nm | CCD | 45 cm | 3.7 cm2–169.5 cm2 | Not specified | 200 msec |
| Custom system (Kochi Medical School) | LEDs emitting light centered at 760 nm, incident power not specified | 840 nm cut-on filter | Color CCD | ~50 cm | 78.5 cm2 | Not specified | Not specified |