Literature DB >> 20532642

Molecular imaging using light-absorbing imaging agents and a clinical optical breast imaging system--a phantom study.

Stephanie M W Y van de Ven1, Niculae Mincu, Jean Brunette, Guobin Ma, Mario Khayat, Debra M Ikeda, Sanjiv S Gambhir.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the feasibility of using a clinical optical breast scanner with molecular imaging strategies based on modulating light transmission. PROCEDURES: Different concentrations of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNT; 0.8-20.0 nM) and black hole quencher-3 (BHQ-3; 2.0-32.0 µM) were studied in specifically designed phantoms (200-1,570 mm(3)) with a clinical optical breast scanner using four wavelengths. Each phantom was placed in the scanner tank filled with optical matching medium. Background scans were compared to absorption scans, and reproducibility was assessed.
RESULTS: All SWNT phantoms were detected at four wavelengths, with best results at 684 nm. Higher concentrations (≥8.0 µM) were needed for BHQ-3 detection, with the largest contrast at 684 nm. The optical absorption signal was dependent on phantom size and concentration. Reproducibility was excellent (intraclass correlation 0.93-0.98).
CONCLUSION: Nanomolar concentrations of SWNT and micromolar concentrations of BHQ-3 in phantoms were reproducibly detected, showing the potential of light absorbers, with appropriate targeting ligands, as molecular imaging agents for clinical optical breast imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20532642      PMCID: PMC4156007          DOI: 10.1007/s11307-010-0356-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  28 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive in vivo characterization of breast tumors using photon migration spectroscopy.

Authors:  B J Tromberg; N Shah; R Lanning; A Cerussi; J Espinoza; T Pham; L Svaasand; J Butler
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  Shedding light onto live molecular targets.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder; Vasilis Ntziachristos
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Diagnostic imaging of breast cancer using fluorescence-enhanced optical tomography: phantom studies.

Authors:  A Godavarty; A B Thompson; R Roy; M Gurfinkel; M J Eppstein; C Zhang; E M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Concurrent MRI and diffuse optical tomography of breast after indocyanine green enhancement.

Authors:  V Ntziachristos; A G Yodh; M Schnall; B Chance
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Nicky H G M Peters; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Nicolaas P A Zuithoff; Willem P T M Mali; Karel G M Moons; Petra H M Peeters
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Photon migration through a turbid slab described by a model based on diffusion approximation. I. Theory.

Authors:  D Contini; F Martelli; G Zaccanti
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 1.980

7.  Carbon nanotubes as multifunctional biological transporters and near-infrared agents for selective cancer cell destruction.

Authors:  Nadine Wong Shi Kam; Michael O'Connell; Jeffrey A Wisdom; Hongjie Dai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Probing physiology and molecular function using optical imaging: applications to breast cancer.

Authors:  V Ntziachristos; B Chance
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2000-11-29       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Time-domain optical mammography SoftScan: initial results.

Authors:  Xavier Intes
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Three-dimensional in vivo fluorescence diffuse optical tomography of breast cancer in humans.

Authors:  Alper Corlu; Regine Choe; Turgut Durduran; Mark A Rosen; Martin Schweiger; Simon R Arridge; Mitchell D Schnall; Arjun G Yodh
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  2 in total

1.  Optical imaging in breast cancer diagnosis: the next evolution.

Authors:  Michel Herranz; Alvaro Ruibal
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.375

2.  Cellulose Nanoparticles are a Biodegradable Photoacoustic Contrast Agent for Use in Living Mice.

Authors:  Jesse V Jokerst; Dominique Van de Sompel; Sarah E Bohndiek; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2014-09-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.